Skip to main content

Abstract

Writing [the literature review] well is a sign of professional maturity; it indicates one’s grasp of the field, one’s methodological sophistication in critiquing others’ research, and the breadth and depth of one’s reading.

Writing [the literature review] well is a sign of professional maturity; it indicates one’s grasp of the field, one’s methodological sophistication in critiquing others’ research, and the breadth and depth of one’s reading.

Krathwohl (1988, p. 4)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The LPU is a somewhat controversial approach towards scholarly research (see Owen 2004). Our reference to the concept of the LPU is only to compare and contrast it to the other strategies of scholarly publication.

References

  • Bradbury J, Keim B, Wake C (2003) The influence of regional storm tracking and teleconnections on winter precipitation in the Northeastern United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93:544–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint C (2003) Political geography II: terrorism, modernity, governance and governmentality. Prog Hum Geogr 27:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl D (1988) How to prepare a research proposal: guidelines for funding & dissertations in the social & behavioral sciences. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller P (1971) Dissertation abstract: Thünian analysis at the macro-scale: a trend-surface analysis of the spatial organization of american agriculture. Department of Geography, Rutgers University, A. Getis (advisor)

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen W (2004) First person: in defense of the least publishable unit. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com.

  • Steiger E, de Albuquerque JP, Zipf A (2015) An advanced systematic literature review on spatiotemporal analyses of Twitter data. Trans GIS 19(6):809–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suvanto S, Applegate G, Permana R, Khususiyah N, Kurniawan I (2004) The role of fire in changing landuse and livelihoods in Riau-Sumatra. Ecol Soc 9:15 (11 pages)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay D. Gatrell .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gatrell, J.D., Bierly, G.D., Jensen, R.R., Thakur, R.R. (2020). Literature Reviews. In: Research Design and Proposal Writing in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60019-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics