Abstract
Virtual Patients (VPs) were a mandatory component of the surgical rotation at McGill University for medical students and focused specifically on the teaching of trauma. These cases, written by clinicians and clinical researchers with research experience in VPs, enabled students not only to acquire core knowledge in the identification and management of trauma, but also provided an opportunity to practise skills, such as clinical decision-making and communicating in emotionally challenging situations (e.g., approaching a family member to discuss organ donation). Both faculty and learners appreciate the significant advantage of using VPs: it is a teaching modality which provides meaningful educational opportunities to learners, without risk of harm to patients (Cook et al. in Acad Med 85(10):1589–1602, [7]; Voelker in J Am Med Assoc 290(13):1700–1701, [26]). The authors were inspired by their experiences with these VP cases and began to consider how they might be able to contribute to this field. They became convinced that they could expand on the service offerings that were available at that time, by developing a platform for medical learners. This chapter focuses on this journey. The authors (AS, OM), with another colleague, a software developer, approached faculty at McGill whose expertise was in developing and researching VP cases. This collaboration has led to the creation of the VP software platform, Affinity Learning, and a content-based VP company, VPConnect. In this chapter, we will discuss our experience partnering, as medical students, with members of academia, research, clinicians and industry to create a VP platform, specifically highlighting:
-
1.
The virtual environment as an effective, safe, and cost-efficient way to educate medical trainees;
-
2.
The requirements behind a successful VP platform;
-
3.
The obstacles and challenges we faced in developing a medical education innovation; and
-
4.
Our thoughts on charting a way forward.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auerbach, M., Stone, K.P., Patterson, M.D.: The role of simulation in improving patient safety. In: Grant, V.J., Cheng, A. (eds.) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Pediatrics, pp. 55–65. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24187-6_5(2016)
Barsness, K.A.: Trends in technical and team simulations: challenging the status quo of surgical training. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 24(3), 130–133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2015.02.011
Bond, W.F., Lynch, T.J., Mischler, M.J., Fish, J.L., McGarvey, J.S., Taylor, J.T., Kumar, D.M., Mou, K.M., Ebert-Allen, R.A., Mahale, D.N., Talbot, T.B., Aiyer, M.: Virtual standardized patient simulation: case development and pilot application to high-value care. Simul. Healthc. 14(4), 241–250 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000373
Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative: A National Interprofessional Competency Framework. Retrieved from: https://ipcontherun.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/National-Framework.pdf (2010)
Charon, R.: Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 286(15), 1897–1902 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.15.1897
Cook, D.A., Blachman, M.J., Price, D.W., West, C.P., Baasch Thomas, B.L., Berger, R.A., Wittich, C.M.: Educational technologies for physician continuous professional development: a national survey. Acad. Med. J. Assoc. Am. Med. Coll. 93(1), 104–112 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001817
Cook, D.A., Erwin, P.J., Triola, M.M.: Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad. Med. 85(10), 1589–1602 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181edfe13
Cook, D.A., Triola, M.M.: Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med. Educ. 43(4), 303–311 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03286.x
Chang, T.P., Gerard, J., Pusic, M.V.: Screen-based simulation, virtual reality, and haptic simulators. In: Grant, V.J., Cheng, A. (eds.) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Pediatrics, pp. 105–114. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24187-6_9(2016)
Daniel, D., Wolbrink, T.: Comparison of healthcare professionals’ motivations for using different online learning materials. Ped. Invest. 3(2), 96–101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12131
Dubé, M.M., Reid, J., Kaba, A., Cheng, A., Eppich, W., Grant, V., Stone, K.: PEARLS for systems integration: a modified PEARLS framework for debriefing systems-focused simulations. Simul. Healthc. 14(5), 333–342 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000381
Duque, G., Fung, S., Mallet, L., Posel, N., Fleiszer, D.: Learning while having fun: the use of video gaming to teach geriatric house calls to medical students. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 56(7), 1328–1332 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01759.x
Gottfredson, C., Mosher, B.: Are you Meeting all Five Moments of Learning Need? Learning Solutions. https://learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/949/are-you-meeting-all-five-moments-of-learning-need (2012)
Haerling, K.A.: Cost-utility analysis of virtual and mannequin-based simulation. Simul. Healthc. 13(1), 33–40 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000280
Harrysson, I.J., Cook, J., Sirimanna, P., Feldman, L.S., Darzi, A., Aggarwal, R.: Systematic review of learning curves for minimally invasive abdominal surgery: a review of the methodology of data collection, depiction of outcomes, and statistical analysis. Ann. Surg. 260(1), 37–45 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000596
Holden, R.J., Carayon, P., Gurses, A.P., Hoonakker, P., Hundt, A.S., Ozok, A.A., Rivera-Rodriguez, A.J.: SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics 56(11), 1669–1686 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.838643
Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1984)
Lin, Y., Cheng, A., Hecker, K., Grant, V., Currie, G.R.: Implementing economic evaluation in simulation-based medical education: challenges and opportunities. Med. Educ. 52(2), 150–160 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13411
Petrosoniak, A., Brydges, R., Nemoy, L., Campbell, D.M.: Adapting form to function: can simulation serve our healthcare system and educational needs? Advances in Simulation 3(8) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-018-0067-4
Plaksin, J., Nicholson, J., Kundrod, S., Zabar, S., Kalet, A., Altshuler, L.: The benefits and risks of being a standardized patient: a narrative review of the literature. Patient 9(1), 15–25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-015-0127-y
Posel, N., Hoover, M.L., Bergman, S., Grushka, J., Rosenzveig, A., Fleiszer, D.: Objective assessment of the entrustable professional activity handover in undergraduate and postgraduate surgical learners. J. Surg. Educ. 76(5), 1258–1266 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.03.008
Robin, B.R., McNeil, S.G., Cook, D.A., Agarwal, K.L., Singhal, G.R.: Preparing for the changing role of instructional technologies in medical education. Acad. Med. J. Assoc. Am. Med. Coll. 86(4), 435–439 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dbee4
Statistics Canada.: Crude birth rate, age-specific fertility rates and total fertility rate (live births). https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310041801 (2020)
Stone, K.P., Huang, L., Reid, J.R., Deutsch, E.S.: Systems integration, human factors, and simulation. In: Grant, V.J., Cheng, A. (eds.) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Pediatrics, pp. 67–75. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24187-6_6(2016)
Tellier, P.P., Bélanger, E., Rodríguez, C., Ware, M.A., Posel, N.: Improving undergraduate medical education about pain assessment and management: a qualitative descriptive study of stakeholders’ perceptions. Pain Res. Manage. 18(5), 259–265 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/920961
Voelker, R.: Virtual patients help medical students link basic science with clinical care. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 290(13), 1700–1701 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.13.1700
World Health Organization: Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. https://www.who.int/hrh/resources/framework_action/en/ (2010)
Ziv, A., Wolpe, P.R., Small, S.D., Glick, S.: Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad. Med. J. Assoc. Am. Med. Coll. 78(8), 783–788 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200308000-00006
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Sean Doyle for co-founding and developing the Affinity Learning platform, as well as acknowledge Drs. David Fleiszer and Nancy Posel, for their contributions as case authors and owners of VPConnect.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Monton, O., Smith, A., Nakajima, A. (2021). Lessons Learned from Building a Virtual Patient Platform. In: Brooks, A.L., Brahman, S., Kapralos, B., Nakajima, A., Tyerman, J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Recent Advances in Technologies for Inclusive Well-Being. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 196. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59608-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59608-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59607-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59608-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)