Abstract
This chapter argues that the authoritarian regime, anti-democratic rule and the politics of denial which has gone on for years not only leads to the continuation of the Armenian Question which stretches back more than a century, but it also creates a fundamental detachment of the Armenian community living in Turkey from the rest of society and results in Armenians distrusting state apparatus. The increasing level of Turkish nationalism inevitably leads to a sense of isolation and reaction among Armenians in Turkey. However, it also argues that in the case of the Armenian Question, elites, NGOs and intellectual activists have acted collectively, utilizing their resources to challenge hegemonic dominance and to promote political liberalization within Turkey. It concludes that the series of actions or strategies for the recognition of the genocide, urging the state apparatus to come to terms with the past atrocities against Armenians (non-Muslims in general), for fair trial over Dink’s assassination and for a change to more positive policies toward Armenians, should be understood under the conceptual framework of new social movement theories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Aktürk, Ş. (2012). Regimes of Ethnicity and Nationhood in Germany, Russia, and Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Assmann, A. (2011). Cultural memory and Western civilization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bağdat, H. (2016, April 12). Personal ınterview [Personal interview].
Birdal, S. (2017). Tek Adamlaşma: Rejim, Devlet, Jeopolitik (Towards a one-man rule: Regime, State and Geopolitics). In G. Özcan, E. Balta, & B. Beşgül (Eds.), Kuşku ile Komşuluk: Türkiye ve Rusya İlişkilerinde Değişen Dinamikler (Suspicion and Neighbourhood: The Changing Dynamics between Russia and Turkey (pp. 300–321). Istanbul: İletişim.
Cohen, J. L. (1985). Strategy or identity: New theoretical paradigms and contemporary social movements. Social Research, 52(4), 663–716.
Değirmenciyan, S. (2016, March 5). Personal interview [Personal interview].
Demirhisar, D. G. (2016). Emotion and protest in Turkey: What happened on 19 January 2007? Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/deniz-g-nce-demirhisar/emotion-and-protest-in-turkey-what-happened-on-19-january-2007
Garavanian, G. J. (2000). The transgenerational effects of the Armenian Genocide (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 9984953).
Göcek, F. M. (2015). Denial of violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Görgülü, A. (2016, June 25). Personal interview [Personal interview].
Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action Volume 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jasper, J. M. (1997). The art of moral protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mitchell, T.R. (1978). People in organizations: Understanding their behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Minow, M. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness: Facing history after genocide and mass violence. Boston: Beacon.
Muller, E. N., & Opp, K. D. (1986). Rational Choice and Rebellious Collective Action. American Political Science Review, 80(2), 471–489.
Nagle, J. (2008). Challenging ethno-national division: New social movements in Belfast. Social Movement Studies, 7(3), 305–318.
Paylan, G. (2017, February 5). Personal interview [Personal interview].
Rucht, D. (1988). Themes, logics and arenas of social movements: A structural approach. In B. Klanderman, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), From structure to action: Comparing social movement participation across cultures (pp. 305–328). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Sheklian, C. (2018). Promises of property: Religious foundations and the Justice and Development Party’s ambiguous attitudes towards religious minorities. Turkish Studies, 20(3), 403–420.
Tekir, S. (2016, June 12). Personal interview [Personal interview].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Galip, Ö.B. (2020). Concluding Remarks. In: New Social Movements and the Armenian Question in Turkey. Modernity, Memory and Identity in South-East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59400-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59400-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59399-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59400-8
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)