Advertisement

Argumentation Is Elementary: The Case for Teaching Argumentation in Elementary Mathematics Classrooms

Chapter
  • 252 Downloads
Part of the Mathematics in Mind book series (MATHMIN)

Abstract

Navigating the information age successfully requires that consumers of data assess and critique the validity of its content and in doing so, create a logical argument that supports or refutes its truth. Furthermore, the skill sets and qualifications expected of the workforce no longer consist of following simple routines, but necessitate problem solving and the understanding of complex systems through constructing, describing, explaining, manipulating, and predicting (English et al. 2013). These skills are central to mathematics, and we believe that, more specifically, the development of strong argumentation and reasoning skills in mathematics enables learners to navigate the complexities and the increasing volume of information they encounter. In this chapter, we contend that argumentation needs to play a more significant role in elementary mathematics and that its implementation can enable learners to develop key skill sets that are essential for deep mathematical thinking and reasoning skills.

References

  1. Ayalon, M. (2019). Exploring changes in mathematics teachers’ envisioning of potential argumentation situations in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education 85: 190–203.Google Scholar
  2. Ayalon, M. and Even, R. (2014). Factors shaping students’ opportunities to engage in argumentative activity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14: 575–601.Google Scholar
  3. Ayalon, M. and Hershkowitz, R. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ attention to potential classroom situations of argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 49: 163–173.Google Scholar
  4. Balacheff, N. (2002). The researcher epistemology: a deadlock for educational research on proof. In: 2002 International conference on mathematics-understanding proving and proving to understand (23–44).Google Scholar
  5. Ball, D. L. (1991). What’s all this talk about “discourse”? The Arithmetic Teacher 39 (3): 44.Google Scholar
  6. Ball, D. L., Hoyles, C., Jahnke, H. N., and Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (2002). The teaching of proof. Proceedings of the ICM, Beijing 2002, 3, 907–922.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., and Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education 59 (5): 389–407.Google Scholar
  8. Bieda, K. N. (2010). Enacting proof-related tasks in middle school mathematics: Challenges and opportunities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 41 (4): 351–382.Google Scholar
  9. Bieda, K. N., Ji, X., Drwencke, J., and Picard, A. (2014). Reasoning-and-proving opportunities in elementary mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Education Research 64: 71–80.Google Scholar
  10. Bostiga, S. E., Cantin, M. L., Fontana, C. V., and Casa, T. M. (2016). Moving math in the write direction: Reflect and discuss. Teaching Children Mathematics 22: 546–554.Google Scholar
  11. Brodahl, C. and Wathne, U. (2018). Imaginary dialogues: In-service teachers’ steps towards mathematical argumentation in classroom discourse. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education 22: 30–42.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, R. (2017). Using collective argumentation to engage students in a primary mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal 29: 183–199.Google Scholar
  13. Cai, J. and Cirillo, M. (2014). What do we know about reasoning and proving? Opportunities and missing opportunities from curriculum analyses. International Journal of Educational Research 64: 132–140.Google Scholar
  14. Cervantes-Barraza, J. A., and Cabañas-Sánchez, G. C. (2018). Formal and visual arguments in collective arguments. Mathematics Education 30(1): 148–168.Google Scholar
  15. Cervantes-Barraza, J. A., Moreno, A. H., and Rumsey, C. (2020). Promoting mathematical proof from collective argumentation in primary school. School Science and Mathematics 120: 4–14.Google Scholar
  16. Cirillo, M., Kosko, K., Newton, J., Staples, M., Weber, K., Bieda, K., and Conner, A. (2015). Conceptions and consequences of what we call argumentation, justification, and proof. In: Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the psychology of mathematics education (1343–1351).Google Scholar
  17. Civil, M., and Hunter, R. (2015). Participation of non-dominant students in argumentation in the mathematics classroom. Intercultural Education 26(4): 296–312.Google Scholar
  18. Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics 86: 401–429.Google Scholar
  19. English, L. D., Hudson, P., and Dawes, L. (2013). Engineering-based problem solving in the middle school: design and construction with simple machines. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research 3: 43–55.Google Scholar
  20. Flegas, K. and Charalampos, L. (2013). Exploring logical reasoning and mathematical proof in Grade 6 elementary school students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education 13: 70–89.Google Scholar
  21. Francisco, J. M. and Maher, C. A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: Insights from a longitudinal study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 24 (3–4): 361–372.Google Scholar
  22. Francisco, J. M., and Maher, C. A. (2011). Teachers attending to students’ mathematical reasoning: Lessons from an after-school research program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 14(1): 49–66.Google Scholar
  23. Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 35: 258–291.Google Scholar
  24. Goulding, M., Rowland, T., and Barber, P. (2002). Does it matter? Primary teacher trainees’ subject knowledge in mathematics. British Educational Research Journal 28(5): 689–704.Google Scholar
  25. Hanna G. and Jahnke H. N. (1996) Proof and Proving. In: A. J., Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, and C. Laborde C. (eds), International handbook of mathematics education, 877–908. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics 44 (1–2): 5–23.Google Scholar
  27. Hanna, G. and de Villiers, M. (2008). ICMI study 19: Proof and proving in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education 40: 329–336.Google Scholar
  28. Hoffman, B. L., Breyfogle, M. L., and Dressler, J. A. (2009). The power of incorrect answers. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 15: 232–238.Google Scholar
  29. Kazemi, E. and Stipek, D. (2009). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms. Journal of Education 189 (1–2): 123–137.Google Scholar
  30. Knudsen, J., Lara-Meloy, T., Stevens, H. S., and Rutstein, D. W. (2014). Advice for mathematical argumentation. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 19: 494–500.Google Scholar
  31. Knuth, E. J. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 379–405.Google Scholar
  32. Kosko, K. W., Rougee, A., and Herbst, P. (2014). What actions do teachers envision when asked to facilitate mathematical argumentation in the classroom? Mathematics Education Research Journal 26: 459–476.Google Scholar
  33. Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., and Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology 100(3): 716–725.Google Scholar
  34. Krummheuer, G. (2015). Methods for reconstructing processes of argumentation and participation in primary mathematics classroom interaction. In: Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education, 51–74. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Lin, P. J. and Tsai, W. H. (2012). Fifth graders mathematics proofs in classroom contexts. Proceedings of PME, 36.Google Scholar
  36. Makar, K., Bakker, A., and Ben-Zvi, D. (2015). Scaffolding norms of argumentation-based inquiry in a primary mathematics classroom. ZDM Mathematics Education 47: 1107–1120.Google Scholar
  37. Marks Krpan, C. (2001). The write math. Parsippany: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  38. Marks Krpan, C. (2011) Engaging struggling learners in group problem solving in mathematics In: C. Rolheiser (ed.), School university partnerships: Creative connections, OISE, 110–117. Toronto: OISE.Google Scholar
  39. Marks Krpan, C. (2013). Math expressions: Promoting problem solving and mathematical thinking through communication. Toronto: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  40. Marks Krpan, C. (2018). Teaching math with meaning; Cultivating self-efficacy through learning competencies. Toronto: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  41. Marks Krpan, C. and Sahmbi, G. (2019). Arguing for access: Teachers’ perspectives on the use of argumentation in elementary mathematics and its impact on student success. In: 2019 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
  42. Marks Krpan, C. and Sahmbi, G. (2020). Reasoning Represented: Teachers’ perspectives on students use of mathematical representations in counter arguments in mathematics. Canadian Society for the Study of Education Conference, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
  43. McCrone, S. S. (2005). The development of mathematical discussions: An investigation in a fifth-grade classroom. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 7: 111–133.Google Scholar
  44. McCrory, R. and Stylianides, A. J. (2014). Reasoning-and-proving in mathematics textbooks for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Educational Research 64: 119–131.Google Scholar
  45. Mercer, N. (2010). The effective use of talk in the classroom. Interacció comunicativa i ensenyament de llengües, 19–28.Google Scholar
  46. Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., and Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education 27: 283–297.Google Scholar
  47. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  48. Ontario Ministry of Education (2005a). The Ontario curriculum grades 1-8: Mathematics. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/math18curr.pdf
  49. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2005b). The Ontario curriculum grades 9 and 10: Mathematics. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/math910curr.pdf.
  50. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007). The Ontario curriculum grades 11 and 12: Mathematics. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/math1112currb.pdf.
  51. Reid, D., Knipping, C., and Crosby, M. (2011). Refutation and the logic of practices. PNA 6: 1–10.Google Scholar
  52. Rumsey, C. W. (2012). Advancing fourth-grade students’ understanding of arithmetic properties with instruction that promotes mathematical argumentation. Illinois State University.Google Scholar
  53. Rumsey, C. (2013). A Model to Interpret Elementary-School Students’ Mathematical Arguments. In Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.Google Scholar
  54. Rumsey, C. and Langrall, C. W. (2016). Promoting mathematical argumentation. Teaching Children Mathematics 22: 412–419.Google Scholar
  55. Rumsey, C., Guarino, J., Gildea, R., Cho, C. Y., and Lockhart, B. (2019). Tools to support K–2 students in mathematical argumentation. Teaching Children Mathematics 25: 208–217.Google Scholar
  56. Schwarz, B. B., Hershkowitz, R., and Prusak, N. (2010). Argumentation and mathematics. Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction 115: 141.Google Scholar
  57. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15: 4–14.Google Scholar
  58. Solar, H., Ortiz, A., Deulofeu, J., and Ulloa, R. (2020). Teacher support for argumentation and the incorporation of contingencies in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1733686
  59. Solomon, A. (2009). The use of vocabulary in an eighth grade mathematics classroom: Improving usage of mathematics vocabulary in oral and written communication. Action Research Projects 29. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidactionresearch/29.
  60. Sowder, L. and Harel, G. (1998). Types of students’ justifications. The Mathematics Teacher 91: 670–675.Google Scholar
  61. Staples, M. and Newton, J. (2016). Teachers’ contextualization of argumentation in the mathematics classroom. Theory into Practice 55: 294–301.Google Scholar
  62. Stylianides, A. J. (2007a). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 38: 289–321.Google Scholar
  63. Stylianides, A. J. (2007b). The notion of proof in the context of elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 65: 1–20.Google Scholar
  64. Stylianides, A. J. (2016). Proving in the elementary mathematics classroom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., and Shilling-Traina, L. N. (2013). Prospective teachers’ challenges in teaching reasoning-and-proving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 11: 1463–1490.Google Scholar
  66. Turner, J. C. and Meyer, D. K. (2004). A classroom perspective on the principle of moderate challenge in mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research 97: 311–318.Google Scholar
  67. Weber, K. (2014). What is a proof? A linguistic answer to an educational question. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1145–1149.Google Scholar
  68. Whitenack, J, and Yackel, E. (2002). Making mathematical arguments in the primary grades: The importance of explaining and justifying ideas. Teaching Children Mathematics 8: 524–527.Google Scholar
  69. Yackel, E. (2001). Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In: M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education PME-25, vol. 1. (1–9). Utrecht.Google Scholar
  70. Yackel, E. (2004). Theoretical perspectives for analyzing explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Education 8: 1–18.Google Scholar
  71. Yackel, E. and Hanna, G. (2001). Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In: Proceedings of the Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (25th, Utrecht, The Netherlands).Google Scholar
  72. Zolkower, B. and Shreyar, S. (2007). A teacher’s mediation of a thinking-aloud discussion in a 6th grade mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics 65: 177.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations