# Argumentation Is Elementary: The Case for Teaching Argumentation in Elementary Mathematics Classrooms

- 167 Downloads

## Abstract

Navigating the information age successfully requires that consumers of data assess and critique the validity of its content and in doing so, create a logical argument that supports or refutes its truth. Furthermore, the skill sets and qualifications expected of the workforce no longer consist of following simple routines, but necessitate problem solving and the understanding of complex systems through constructing, describing, explaining, manipulating, and predicting (English et al. 2013). These skills are central to mathematics, and we believe that, more specifically, the development of strong argumentation and reasoning skills in mathematics enables learners to navigate the complexities and the increasing volume of information they encounter. In this chapter, we contend that argumentation needs to play a more significant role in elementary mathematics and that its implementation can enable learners to develop key skill sets that are essential for deep mathematical thinking and reasoning skills.

## References

- Ayalon, M. (2019). Exploring changes in mathematics teachers’ envisioning of potential argumentation situations in the classroom.
*Teaching and Teacher Education*85: 190–203.Google Scholar - Ayalon, M. and Even, R. (2014). Factors shaping students’ opportunities to engage in argumentative activity.
*International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education*14: 575–601.Google Scholar - Ayalon, M. and Hershkowitz, R. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ attention to potential classroom situations of argumentation.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior*49: 163–173.Google Scholar - Balacheff, N. (2002). The researcher epistemology: a deadlock for educational research on proof. In:
*2002 International conference on mathematics-understanding proving and proving to understand*(23–44).Google Scholar - Ball, D. L. (1991). What’s all this talk about “discourse”?
*The Arithmetic Teacher*39 (3): 44.Google Scholar - Ball, D. L., Hoyles, C., Jahnke, H. N., and Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (2002). The teaching of proof.
*Proceedings of the ICM*, Beijing 2002, 3, 907–922.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., and Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?
*Journal of Teacher Education*59 (5): 389–407.Google Scholar - Bieda, K. N. (2010). Enacting proof-related tasks in middle school mathematics: Challenges and opportunities.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*41 (4): 351–382.Google Scholar - Bieda, K. N., Ji, X., Drwencke, J., and Picard, A. (2014). Reasoning-and-proving opportunities in elementary mathematics textbooks.
*International Journal of Education Research*64: 71–80.Google Scholar - Bostiga, S. E., Cantin, M. L., Fontana, C. V., and Casa, T. M. (2016). Moving math in the write direction: Reflect and discuss.
*Teaching Children Mathematics*22: 546–554.Google Scholar - Brodahl, C. and Wathne, U. (2018). Imaginary dialogues: In-service teachers’ steps towards mathematical argumentation in classroom discourse.
*Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education*22: 30–42.Google Scholar - Brown, R. (2017). Using collective argumentation to engage students in a primary mathematics classroom.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal*29: 183–199.Google Scholar - Cai, J. and Cirillo, M. (2014). What do we know about reasoning and proving? Opportunities and missing opportunities from curriculum analyses.
*International Journal of Educational Research*64: 132–140.Google Scholar - Cervantes-Barraza, J. A., and Cabañas-Sánchez, G. C. (2018). Formal and visual arguments in collective arguments.
*Mathematics Education*30(1): 148–168.Google Scholar - Cervantes-Barraza, J. A., Moreno, A. H., and Rumsey, C. (2020). Promoting mathematical proof from collective argumentation in primary school.
*School Science and Mathematics*120: 4–14.Google Scholar - Cirillo, M., Kosko, K., Newton, J., Staples, M., Weber, K., Bieda, K., and Conner, A. (2015). Conceptions and consequences of what we call argumentation, justification, and proof. In:
*Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the psychology of mathematics education*(1343–1351).Google Scholar - Civil, M., and Hunter, R. (2015). Participation of non-dominant students in argumentation in the mathematics classroom.
*Intercultural Education*26(4): 296–312.Google Scholar - Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*86: 401–429.Google Scholar - English, L. D., Hudson, P., and Dawes, L. (2013). Engineering-based problem solving in the middle school: design and construction with simple machines.
*Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research*3: 43–55.Google Scholar - Flegas, K. and Charalampos, L. (2013). Exploring logical reasoning and mathematical proof in Grade 6 elementary school students.
*Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education*13: 70–89.Google Scholar - Francisco, J. M. and Maher, C. A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: Insights from a longitudinal study.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior*24 (3–4): 361–372.Google Scholar - Francisco, J. M., and Maher, C. A. (2011). Teachers attending to students’ mathematical reasoning: Lessons from an after-school research program.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education*14(1): 49–66.Google Scholar - Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*35: 258–291.Google Scholar - Goulding, M., Rowland, T., and Barber, P. (2002). Does it matter? Primary teacher trainees’ subject knowledge in mathematics.
*British Educational Research Journal*28(5): 689–704.Google Scholar - Hanna G. and Jahnke H. N. (1996) Proof and Proving. In: A. J., Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, and C. Laborde C. (eds),
*International handbook of mathematics education*, 877–908. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar - Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*44 (1–2): 5–23.Google Scholar - Hanna, G. and de Villiers, M. (2008). ICMI study 19: Proof and proving in mathematics education.
*ZDM Mathematics Education*40: 329–336.Google Scholar - Hoffman, B. L., Breyfogle, M. L., and Dressler, J. A. (2009). The power of incorrect answers.
*Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School*15: 232–238.Google Scholar - Kazemi, E. and Stipek, D. (2009). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms.
*Journal of Education*189 (1–2): 123–137.Google Scholar - Knudsen, J., Lara-Meloy, T., Stevens, H. S., and Rutstein, D. W. (2014). Advice for mathematical argumentation.
*Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School*19: 494–500.Google Scholar - Knuth, E. J. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*, 379–405.Google Scholar - Kosko, K. W., Rougee, A., and Herbst, P. (2014). What actions do teachers envision when asked to facilitate mathematical argumentation in the classroom?
*Mathematics Education Research Journal*26: 459–476.Google Scholar - Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., and Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers.
*Journal of Educational Psychology*100(3): 716–725.Google Scholar - Krummheuer, G. (2015). Methods for reconstructing processes of argumentation and participation in primary mathematics classroom interaction. In:
*Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education*, 51–74. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar - Lin, P. J. and Tsai, W. H. (2012). Fifth graders mathematics proofs in classroom contexts.
*Proceedings of PME*, 36.Google Scholar - Makar, K., Bakker, A., and Ben-Zvi, D. (2015). Scaffolding norms of argumentation-based inquiry in a primary mathematics classroom.
*ZDM Mathematics Education*47: 1107–1120.Google Scholar - Marks Krpan, C. (2001).
*The write math*. Parsippany: Pearson Education.Google Scholar - Marks Krpan, C. (2011) Engaging struggling learners in group problem solving in mathematics In: C. Rolheiser (ed.),
*School university partnerships: Creative connections, OISE*, 110–117. Toronto: OISE.Google Scholar - Marks Krpan, C. (2013).
*Math expressions: Promoting problem solving and mathematical thinking through communication*. Toronto: Pearson Education.Google Scholar - Marks Krpan, C. (2018).
*Teaching math with meaning; Cultivating self-efficacy through learning competencies*. Toronto: Pearson Education.Google Scholar - Marks Krpan, C. and Sahmbi, G. (2019). Arguing for access: Teachers’ perspectives on the use of argumentation in elementary mathematics and its impact on student success. In:
*2019 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education.*Google Scholar - Marks Krpan, C. and Sahmbi, G. (2020). Reasoning Represented: Teachers’ perspectives on students use of mathematical representations in counter arguments in mathematics. Canadian Society for the Study of Education Conference, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
- McCrone, S. S. (2005). The development of mathematical discussions: An investigation in a fifth-grade classroom.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning*7: 111–133.Google Scholar - McCrory, R. and Stylianides, A. J. (2014). Reasoning-and-proving in mathematics textbooks for prospective elementary teachers.
*International Journal of Educational Research*64: 119–131.Google Scholar - Mercer, N. (2010). The effective use of talk in the classroom.
*Interacció comunicativa i ensenyament de llengües*, 19–28.Google Scholar - Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., and Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life.
*Studies in Philosophy and Education*27: 283–297.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000).
*Principles and standards for school mathematics.*Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Ontario Ministry of Education (2005a).
*The Ontario curriculum grades 1-8: Mathematics.*http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/math18curr.pdf - Ontario Ministry of Education. (2005b).
*The Ontario curriculum grades 9 and 10: Mathematics.*http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/math910curr.pdf. - Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007).
*The Ontario curriculum grades 11 and 12: Mathematics.*http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/math1112currb.pdf. - Reid, D., Knipping, C., and Crosby, M. (2011). Refutation and the logic of practices.
*PNA*6: 1–10.Google Scholar - Rumsey, C. W. (2012).
*Advancing fourth-grade students’ understanding of arithmetic properties with instruction that promotes mathematical argumentation*. Illinois State University.Google Scholar - Rumsey, C. (2013). A Model to Interpret Elementary-School Students’ Mathematical Arguments. In
*Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*.Google Scholar - Rumsey, C. and Langrall, C. W. (2016). Promoting mathematical argumentation.
*Teaching Children Mathematics*22: 412–419.Google Scholar - Rumsey, C., Guarino, J., Gildea, R., Cho, C. Y., and Lockhart, B. (2019). Tools to support K–2 students in mathematical argumentation.
*Teaching Children Mathematics*25: 208–217.Google Scholar - Schwarz, B. B., Hershkowitz, R., and Prusak, N. (2010). Argumentation and mathematics.
*Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction*115: 141.Google Scholar - Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.
*Educational Researcher*15: 4–14.Google Scholar - Solar, H., Ortiz, A., Deulofeu, J., and Ulloa, R. (2020). Teacher support for argumentation and the incorporation of contingencies in mathematics classrooms.
*International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology*. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1733686 - Solomon, A. (2009). The use of vocabulary in an eighth grade mathematics classroom: Improving usage of mathematics vocabulary in oral and written communication.
*Action Research Projects*29. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidactionresearch/29. - Sowder, L. and Harel, G. (1998). Types of students’ justifications.
*The Mathematics Teacher*91: 670–675.Google Scholar - Staples, M. and Newton, J. (2016). Teachers’ contextualization of argumentation in the mathematics classroom.
*Theory into Practice*55: 294–301.Google Scholar - Stylianides, A. J. (2007a). Proof and proving in school mathematics.
*Journal of Research in Mathematics Education*38: 289–321.Google Scholar - Stylianides, A. J. (2007b). The notion of proof in the context of elementary school mathematics.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*65: 1–20.Google Scholar - Stylianides, A. J. (2016).
*Proving in the elementary mathematics classroom*. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., and Shilling-Traina, L. N. (2013). Prospective teachers’ challenges in teaching reasoning-and-proving.
*International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education*11: 1463–1490.Google Scholar - Turner, J. C. and Meyer, D. K. (2004). A classroom perspective on the principle of moderate challenge in mathematics.
*The Journal of Educational Research*97: 311–318.Google Scholar - Weber, K. (2014). What is a proof? A linguistic answer to an educational question. In:
*Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education*, 1145–1149.Google Scholar - Whitenack, J, and Yackel, E. (2002). Making mathematical arguments in the primary grades: The importance of explaining and justifying ideas.
*Teaching Children Mathematics*8: 524–527.Google Scholar - Yackel, E. (2001). Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In: M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (ed.),
*Proceedings of the 25th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education PME-25,*vol. 1. (1–9). Utrecht.Google Scholar - Yackel, E. (2004). Theoretical perspectives for analyzing explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms.
*Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Education*8: 1–18.Google Scholar - Yackel, E. and Hanna, G. (2001). Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In:
*Proceedings of the Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics*Education (25th, Utrecht, The Netherlands).Google Scholar - Zolkower, B. and Shreyar, S. (2007). A teacher’s mediation of a thinking-aloud discussion in a 6th grade mathematics classroom.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*65: 177.Google Scholar