Advertisement

Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) in the Context of Bridge Monitoring

Chapter
  • 131 Downloads
Part of the Springer Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry book series (SPRINGERREMO)

Abstract

The structural health of critical transport infrastructure, such as bridges, is difficult to assess and monitor. Existing methods of evaluation rely predominantly on visual inspection and/or the installation of sensors to measure the in-situ performance of structures. There are vast numbers of critical bridge structures that need to be monitored and these are often located in diverse geographical locations which are difficult and costly to access. Recent advances in satellite monitoring using Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) monitoring provide the opportunity for global coverage of assets and the measurement of displacement to sub-centimetre accuracy. Such technologies could provide bridge engineers and asset owners with insights about the health and behaviour of their assets. The key to successful implementation of InSAR monitoring of bridges lies in understanding the limitations and opportunities of InSAR, and making a clear case to satellite data providers on what specifications (resolution, frequency, processing assumptions) would unlock using such datasets for wider use in monitoring of infrastructure. This work examines the application of InSAR for bridge monitoring using case studies of several UK bridge structures. These bridge structures differ in structural form, material and environmental context, but each raise key considerations in practical application of InSAR, and the potential to spot unusual signs behaviour that would alert bridge owners to maintenance problems and potential failures.

Keywords

Bridge Structural health monitoring InSAR Remote sensing 

References

  1. American Society Of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2017. Bridge Infrastructure | Structurally Deficient Bridges | ASCE’s 2017 Infrastructure Report Card.Google Scholar
  2. Auer, S., S. Hinz, and R. Bamler. 2010. Ray Tracing Simulation Techniques for Understanding High Resolution SAR Images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 48 (3): 1445–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bamler, R., and P. Hartl. 1998. Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry. Inverse Problems 14 (4): 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamler, R., and B. Schättler. 1993. SAR Data Acquisition and Image Formation. In SAR Geocoding: Data and Systems, ed. G. Schreier, 53–102. Karlsruhe, Germany: Wichmann.Google Scholar
  5. Berardino, P., G. Fornaro, R. Lanari, and E. Sansosti. 2002a. A New Algorithm for Surface Deformation Monitoring Based on Small Baseline Differential SAR Interferograms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 40 (11): 2375–2383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2002b. A New Algorithm for Surface Deformation Monitoring Based on Small Baseline Differential SAR Interferograms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 40 (11): 2375–2383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bovenga, F., A. Belmonte, A. Refice, G. Pasquariello, R. Nutricato, D.O. Nitti, and M.T. Chiaradia. 2018. Performance Analysis of Satellite Missions for Multi-Temporal SAR Interferometry. Sensors (Switzerland) 18 (5): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crosetto, M., O. Monserrat, M. Cuevas-González, N. Devanthéry, and B. Crippa. 2016. Persistent Scatterer Interferometry: A Review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 115: 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cumming, I., and F. Wong. 2005. Digital Processing of Synthetic Aperture Radar Data: Algorithms and Implementation. Norwood, OH: Artech House Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Cusson, D., and I. Ozkan. 2019. Satellite-based InSAR Monitoring –Validation on Victoria Bridge in Montreal, Canada. In 5th Conference in Smart Monitoring, Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures (SMAR 2019), Potsdam, Germany, August 27–29, 2019.Google Scholar
  11. Cusson, D., K. Trischuk, G. Hewus, M. Gara, and P. Ghuman. 2017. Satellite-Based Monitoring of a Highway Bridge in Canada - Challenges, Solutions and Value. In ISHMII 2017, no. December.Google Scholar
  12. Davila, M., L. J. Butler, N. Gibbons, I. Brilakis, M. Z. E. B. Elshafie, and C. Middleton. 2016. Management of structural monitoring data of bridges using BIM. ICE Proceedings: Bridge Engineering, no. November, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  13. Dheenathayalan, P., D. Small, and R.F. Hanssen. 2018. 3-D Positioning and Target Association for Medium-Resolution SAR Sensors. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 56 (11): 6841–6853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doerry, A. W. 2008. Reflectors for SAR Performance Testing (Tech. Rep.) January. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories.Google Scholar
  15. Ferretti, A., C. Prati, and F. Rocca. 2000. Nonlinear Subsidence Rate Estimation Using Permanent Scatterers in Differential SAR Interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38 (5): 2202–2212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2001. Permanent Scatters in SAR Interferometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39 (1): 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferretti, A., A. Monti-Guarnieri, and C. Prati. 2007a. InSAR Principles-Guidelines for SAR Interferometry Processing and Interpretation (TM-19). ESA, no. February, p. 48.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2007b. InSAR Principles: Guidelines for SAR Interferometry Processing and Interpretation (TM-19), Part C. ESA.Google Scholar
  19. Ferretti, A., A. Monti-guarnieri, C. Prati, and F. Rocca. 2007c. InSAR Principles: Guidelines for SAR Interferometry Processing and Interpretation (TM-19), Part B, 71. ESA.Google Scholar
  20. Ferretti, A., G. Savio, R. Barzaghi, A. Borghi, S. Musazzi, F. Novali, C. Prati, and F. Rocca. 2007d. Submillimeter Accuracy of InSAR Time Series: Experimental Validation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 45 (5): 1142–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gabriel, A.K., R.M. Goldstein, and H.A. Zebker. 1989. Mapping Small Elevation Changes Over Large Areas - Differential Radar Interferometry. Journal of Geophysical Research 94 (B7): 9183–9191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gernhardt, S., and S. Hinz. 2008. Advanced Displacement Estimation for PSI Using High Resolution SAR Data. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 3 (1): 1276–1279.Google Scholar
  23. Gisinger, C., U. Balss, R. Pail, X.X. Zhu, S. Montazeri, S. Gernhardt, and M. Eineder. 2015. Precise Three-Dimensional Stereo Localization of Corner Reflectors and Persistent Scatterers with TerraSAR-X. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 53 (4): 1782–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamill, L. 1998. Bridge Hydraulics. 1st ed. London: CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanssen, R.F. 2001. Radar Interferometry: Data Interpretation and Error Analysis. 1st ed. Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Highways Agency. 2012. The Assessment of Scour and Other Hydraulic Actions at High-way Structures (BD97/12), (Tech. rep.). The Highways Agency, Transport Scotland, Welsh Government and The Department for Regional Development Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
  27. Hu, J., Z.W. Li, X.L. Ding, J.J. Zhu, L. Zhang, and Q. Sun. 2014. Resolving Three-Dimensional Surface Displacements from InSAR Measurements: A Review. Earth-Science Reviews 133: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirby, A., A. Kitchen, M. Escarameia, and O. Chesterton. 2015. Manual on Scour at Bridges and Other Hydraulic Structures (C742). 2nd ed. London: CIRIA.Google Scholar
  29. Lazecky, M., D. Perissin, M. Bakon, J. M. De Sousa, I. Hlavacova, and N. Real. 2015. Potential of Satellite InSAR Techniques for Monitoring of Bridge Deformations. In 2015 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event (JURSE), (Lausanne, Switzerland), pp. 4–7.Google Scholar
  30. Lea, F., and C. R. Middleton. 2002. Reliability of Visual Inspection for Highway Bridges (Tech. Rep. CUED/D-STRUCT/TR. 201). Cambridge: Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. Milillo, P., G. Giardina, D. Perissin, G. Milillo, A. Coletta, and C. Terranova. 2019. Pre-Collapse Space Geodetic Observations of Critical Infrastructure: The Morandi Bridge, Genoa, Italy. Remote Sensing 11 (12): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Monserrat, O., M. Crosetto, M. Cuevas, and B. Crippa. 2011. The Thermal Expansion Component of Persistent Scatterer Interferometry Observations. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 8 (5): 864–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Montazeri, S., F.R. González, and X.X. Zhu. 2018. Geocoding Error Correction for InSAR Point Clouds. Remote Sensing 10 (10): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moore, M., B. Phares, B. Graybeal, R. Dennis, and G. Washer. 2001. Reliability of Visual Inspection for Highway Bridges (Volume I: Final Report, Tech. Rep. FHWA-RD-01-020). McLean, VA: U.S. Department of Transport.Google Scholar
  35. Moreira, A., P. Prats-Iraola, M. Younis, G. Krieger, I. Hajnsek, and K.P. Papathanassiou. 2013. A Tutorial on Synthetic Aperture Radar. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine: 6–43.Google Scholar
  36. Perissin, D., Z. Wang, and H. Lin. 2012. Shanghai Subway Tunnels and Highways Monitoring Through Cosmo-SkyMed Persistent Scatterers. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 73: 58–67. Additional reference from which some figures are also used (PhD thesis).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Press_Association. 2015. Tadcaster bridge over river Wharfe collapses during flooding – video (available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/video/2015/dec/30/tadcaster-bridge-river-wharfe-collapses-flooding-video).
  38. Qin, X., M. Liao, M. Yang, and L. Zhang. 2017. Monitoring Structure Health of Urban Bridges with Advanced Multi-Temporal InSAR Analysis. Annals of GIS 23 (4): 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Qin, X., X. Ding, and M. Liao. 2018. Three-Dimensional Deformation Monitoring and Structural Risk Assessment of Bridges by Integrating Observations from Multiple SAR Sensors. In IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), (Valencia, Spain), 1384–1387. IEEE.Google Scholar
  40. Quin, G., and P. Loreaux. 2013. Submillimeter Accuracy of Multipass Corner Reflector Monitoring by PS Technique. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 51 (3): 1775–1783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. RAC Foundation. 2019. Bridge Maintenance Backlog Grows (Tech. rep.) London, UK: RAC FoundationGoogle Scholar
  42. Ruck, G., and C. Krichbaum. 1968. Radar Cross Section Handbook Supplement (Tech. Rep.). Washington, DC: Advanced Research Projects Agency.Google Scholar
  43. Sarmap SA, SARscape®, 2014.Google Scholar
  44. Selvakumaran, S. 2019. Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar for Remote Satellite Monitoring of Bridges.  https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.51027
  45. Selvakumaran, S., S. Plank, C. Geiß, C. Rossi, and C. Middleton. 2018. Remote Monitoring to Predict Bridge Scour Failure Using Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) Stacking Techniques. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 73: 463–470.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2018.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Selvakumaran, S., C. Rossi, A. Marinoni, G. Webb, J. Bennetts, E. Barton, S. Plank, and C.R. Middleton. 2020. Combined InSAR and Terrestrial Structural Monitoring of Bridges. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2020.2979961.
  47. Soergel, U., H. Gross, A. Thiele, and U. Thoennessen. 2006. Extraction of Bridges Over Water in High-Resolution InSAR Data. Photogrammetric Computer Vision 36.Google Scholar
  48. Sousa, J.J., and L. Bastos. 2013. Multi-Temporal SAR Interferometry Reveals Acceleration of Bridge Sinking Before Collapse. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 13 (3): 659–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering DepartmentUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Satellite Applications CatapultDidcotUK
  3. 3.National Physical LaboratoryTeddingtonUK

Personalised recommendations