Skip to main content

Concluding Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fungi for Human Health

Abstract

Our literature survey reveals that majority of the health benefitting taxa of macrofungi chiefly belong to Agaricomycotina followed by Pezizomycotina with dominancy of species in Agaricomycetes. In the present work, we made an effort to shed light on the health-promoting efficacies of the edible and medicinal macrofungi and discussed these species following the classification of Kirk et al. (2008) current names of macrofungi as per Mycobank database (www.mycobank.org). Macrofungi are represented by 1,250,000 specimens across the globe (Thiers and Halling 2018). This data keeps on changing with the underexplored and unexplored ecogeographic zones. Macromycetes exhibit variations in structure and reproduction, ecology, and edibility. These species are capable of growing on a broad spectrum of substrates such as various types of soil rich in moisture and humus, litter, animal dung, dead decaying wood and organic matter, termite mounds, live trees, and a few even on plastic debris (Brunner et al. 2018; Karun et al. 2018). These species play several pivotal functions in the forest ecosystems such as in cycling of nutrients, as ecosystem scavengers, as pathogens, and as symbionts (Bajpai et al. 2019; Copoț and Tănase 2019). Macrofungi have wide distribution range occurring in various tropical, subtropical, temperate, and alpine forests and even in deserts of different countries across Europe, Africa, America, Asia, and Australia (Tripathi et al. 2017). Macromycetes (edible/medicinal) have marked significance as human health-promising agents. Edible species in the genera Agaricus, Auricularia, Betula, Cordyceps, Morchella, Pleurotus, Russula, Terfezia, etc. are eaten as food, while medicinal species placed in the genera Fomes, Ganoderma, Inonotus, Phellinus, Trametes, etc. are utilized to treat different kinds of diseases in different parts of the world as is evidenced by ethnomycology. The sporocarps of wild edible species of macrofungi are eaten after cooking following different recipes across the world. For medicinal use, the sporocarps of medicinal species are used as whole, in the form of powder or paste. Additionally, some species are toxigenic and accidental consumption of such species cause several precarious health effects such as vomiting, nausea, stomachache, gastroenteritis, diarrhea, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, etc. and in certain cases may prove fatal (Erguven et al. 2007; Vişneci et al. 2019). Therefore, correct identification is prerequisite for the consumption of these species. However, various toxins obtained from the toxigenic species, e.g. A. xanthodermus, possess medicinal properties (Özaltun and Sevindik 2020). Macrofungi are enriched with diverse kinds of nutrients such as carbohydrates, sugars, proteins, fats, fatty acids, amino acids, minerals, and vitamins responsible for their food value. The medicinal mushrooms possess high as well a low molecular weight bioactive constituents. High molecular weight compounds mainly include polysaccharides (β-glucans) and proteins, whereas low molecular weight compounds are secondary metabolites, e.g., terpenoids, phenols, tannins, flavonoids, steroids, alkaloids, etc. All these mycochemicals contribute towards pharmacological activities of mushrooms such as antioxidant, antitumor, antidiabetic, antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, antimalarial, antiviral, and neurodegenerative. Evolution of modern-day techniques such as electron microscopy, WDXRF, GC-MS, LC-MS, etc. revolutionizes the identification, analysis of mycochemical composition, and evaluation of pharmacological potential of macrofungi. The mycelial biomass or extracts of health-promoting edible/medicinal macrofungi are being developed as DSs/functional foods or prebiotics. Several medicinal macrofungal products are available in the market as health supplements in the form of tablets, capsules, powder, or extract, as cosmetics (skin, hair products), tea, antifatigue and immunostimulatory agents, etc. There are various regulatory authorities such as WHO, FAO, and FDA to manage the use and ensure the quality of these commercial products. The wild mushrooms grow naturally, and their growth and occurrence in nature is a chance phenomenon. To meet the growing needs of higher fungi as food, in medicine and industry, cultivation is the best option. Several species of macrofungi with use value to man are in cultivation worldwide with China leading in this industry. A. bisporus, C. sinensis, L. edodes, Pleurotus spp., Auricularia spp., and F. velutipes, G. lucidum, and P. cocos represent the commonly cultivated species in the world. In spite of these inestimable benefits of macrofungi, these are often overlooked and often kept out of conservation plans. Natural calamities like forest fire, floods, tornadoes, etc. disturb the structure and function of ecosystem which is a home to diverse forms of life including macrofungi (Salo and Kouki 2018; Ford et al. 2018). Anthropogenic activities such as deforestation, industrialization, and urbanization are responsible for climatic change which in turn bring changes in the diversity and distribution of macrofungi (Lees and Pimm 2015; Wagensommer et al. 2018). Because of overexploitation, anthropogenic activities, and climate change, wild macrofungi are facing threat of extinction, and several taxa are red listed by IUCN (http://www.eccf.eu). Therefore, for sustainable use of wild macrofungi and to maintain the genetic stability in culture collections, several in situ and ex situ conservation efforts are made regularly by IUCN and other national and international organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bajpai A, Rawat S, Johri BN (2019) Fungal diversity: global perspective and ecosystem dynamics. In: Microbial diversity in ecosystem sustainability and biotechnological applications. Springer, Singapore, pp 83–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner I, Fischer M, RuÈthi J, Stierli B, Frey B (2018) Ability of fungi isolated from plastic debris floating in the shoreline of a lake to degrade plastics. PLoS ONE 13(8):1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Copoț O, Tănase C (2019) Lignicolous fungi ecology-biotic and abiotic interactions in forest ecosystems. Memoirs of the scientific sections of the Romanian academy, 42

    Google Scholar 

  • Erguven M, Yilmaz O, Deveci M, Aksu N, Dursun F, Pelit M, Cebeci N (2007) Mushroom poisoning. Indian J Pediatrics 74:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford SA, Kleinman JS, Hart JL (2018) Effects of wind disturbance and salvage harvesting on macrofungal communities in a Pinus woodland. Forest Ecol Manag 407:31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karun NC, Bhagya BS, Sridhar KR (2018) Biodiversity of macrofungi in Yenepoya campus, Southwest India. Microb Biosyst 3(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA (2008) Ainsworth and Bisby’s dictionary of the fungi, 10th edn. CABI, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lees AC, Pimm SL (2015) Species, extinct before we know them? Curr Biol 25(5):177–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Özaltun B, Sevindik M (2020) Evaluation of the effects on atherosclerosis and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Agaricus xanthodermus poisonous mushroom. Eur Res J:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Salo K, Kouki J (2018) Severity of forest wildfire had a major influence on early successional ectomycorrhizal macrofungi assemblages, including edible mushrooms. Forest Ecol Manag 415:70–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiers BM, Halling RE (2018) The macrofungi collection consortium. Appl Plant Sci 6(2):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi NN, Singh P, Vishwakarma P (2017) Biodiversity of macrofungi with special reference to edible forms: a review. J Indian Bot Soc 96(3):144–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Vişneci EF, Acar D, Özdamar EN, Güven M, Patat M (2019) Mushroom poisoning cases from an emergency department in Central Anatolia: comparison and evaluation of wild and cultivated mushroom poisoning. Eurasian J Emerg Med 18(1):28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagensommer RP, Bistocchi G, Arcangeli A, Rubini A, Perini C, Venanzoni R, Angelini P (2018) An assessment of red list data for the Pezizomycotina (Ascomycota): Umbria (Italy) as a test case. Plant Biosyst 152(6):1329–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

Websites Followed

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Azeem, U., Hakeem, K.R., Ali, M. (2020). Concluding Remarks. In: Fungi for Human Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58756-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics