Skip to main content

Software Engineering for Health Care and Biomedicine

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

Computer applications that collect, organize, interpret, and/or deliver biomedical data and information have been a critical component of biomedical informatics from the beginning of the field. Software applications are often the mechanism whereby advances in the field become activated. As the variety, complexity and breadth of the software tools have changed, considerations about the process and scope of software development has also evolved. Prominent among this evolution has been the development of electronic health records. With the movement of EHRs to predominantly purchased solutions, software engineering has adapted to new approaches that are supporting continued customized software development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    7 https://v.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/physician-ehr-adoption-trends.php and 7 https://dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/FIG-Hospital-EHR-Adoption.php, from 7 https://dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/quickstats.php

  2. 2.

    7 https://dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/FIG-Vendors-of-EHRs-to-Participating-Hospitals.php (last accessed June 3, 2020).

  3. 3.

    7 https://cds-hooks.org/ (last accessed June 3, 2020).

References

  • Adler-Milstein, J., Lin, S. C., & Jha, A. K. (2016). The number of health information exchange efforts is declining, leaving the viability of broad clinical data exchange uncertain. Health Affairs, 35(7), 1278–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D. W. (2006). Invited commentary: The road to implementation of the electronic health record. Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 19(4), 311–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D. W., Leape, L. L., et al. (1998). Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA, 280(15), 1311–1316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K., Beedle, M., et al. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development. 2012, from agilemanifesto.org.

  • Blumenthal, D., & Tavenner, M. (2010). The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363(6), 501–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campanella, P., Lovato, E., Marone, C., Fallacara, L., Mancuso, A., Ricciardi, W., & Specchia, M. L. (2016). The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Public Health, 26(1), 60–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., et al. (2006). Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144(10), 742–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuits, F. M. (1994). The use of the Arden Syntax for MLMs in HIOS+, a decision support system for general practitioners in The Netherlands. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 24(5), 405–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. S., Pestotnik, S. L., et al. (1998). A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. The New England Journal of Medicine, 338(4), 232–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fred, M., Vawdrey, D., et al. (2009). Enhancing a commercial electronic health record with a novel patient handoff application. Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM) Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Y. Y., Carcillo, J. A., et al. (2005). Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics, 116(6), 1506–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hripcsak, G., Kuperman, G. J., et al. (1998). Extracting findings from narrative reports: Software transferability and sources of physician disagreement. Methods of Information in Medicine, 37(1), 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, D. L., Haynes, R. B., et al. (1998). Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. JAMA, 280(15), 1339–1346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenders, R. A. (2008). Suitability of the Arden Syntax for representation of quality indicators. American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium Proceedings, 991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenders, R. A., & Shah, A. (2001). Challenges in using the Arden Syntax for computer-based nosocomial infection surveillance. In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium (pp. 289–293). American Medical Informatics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. S., Rudin, R. S., Perry, T., & Shekelle, P. G. (2014). Health information technology: An updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Annals of Internal Medicine, 160(1), 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawamoto, K., Kukhareva, P., Shakib, J. H., Kramer, H., Rodriguez, S., Warner, P. B., Shields, D., Weir, C., Fiol, G. D., Taft, T., & Stipelman, C. H. (2019). Association of an electronic health record add-on app for neonatal bilirubin management with physician efficiency and care quality. JAMA Network Open, 2(11), e1915343–e1915343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, M., & Gallagher, L. (2006). The EHR seal of approval: CCHIT introduces product certification to spur EHR adoption. Journal of AHIMA, 77(5), 26–30, quiz 33–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, J. C., Kreda, D. A., Mandl, K. D., Kohane, I. S., & Ramoni, R. B. (2016). SMART on FHIR: A standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(5), 899–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, S. (1996). Rapid development : Taming wild software schedules/Steve McConnell. Redmond, Wash: Microsoft Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). (2017a). Certified health IT developers and editions reported by hospitals participating in the medicare EHR incentive program, Health IT Quick-Stat #29. dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/FIG-Vendors-of-EHRs-to-Participating-Hospitals.php. July 2017.

  • Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). (2017b). Non-federal acute care hospital electronic health record adoption, Health IT Quick-Stat #47. dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/FIG-Hospital-EHR-Adoption.php. September 2017.

  • Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). (2019a). Office-based physician electronic health record adoption, Health IT Quick-Stat #50. dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/physician-ehr-adoption-trends.php. January 2019.

  • Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). (2019b). Trusted exchange framework and common agreement | HealthIT.gov. (2019). Retrieved February 2020, from https://www.healthit.gov/topic/interoperability/trusted-exchange-framework-and-common-agreement

  • Ohno-Machado, L., Wang, S. J., et al. (1999). Decision support for clinical trial eligibility determination in breast cancer. In Proceedings of the AMIA symposium (pp. 340–344). American Medical Informatics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, T. A., & Hripcsak, G. (1993). The Arden syntax for medical logic modules. International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 10(4), 215–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shekelle, P. G., Morton, S. C., et al. (2006). Costs and benefits of health information technology. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep), 132(April), 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelcer, J., Miller-Jacobs, H., et al. (2009). Usability of electronic medical records. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(2), 70–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T. (2017). Coast guard seeks new EHR vendor after failed epic implementation. Healthcare IT news. https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/coast-guard-seeks-new-ehr-vendor-after-failed-epic-implementation.

  • Thompson, C.B., Snyder-Halpern, R., & Staggers, N. (1999). Clinical informatics case studies: Analysis, processes, and techniques. Computers in Nursing, 17(5), 203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, V., DeSalvo, K., et al. (2017). The HITECH era and the path forward. The New England Journal of Medicine, 377, 904–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam B. Wilcox .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wilcox, A.B., Vawdrey, D.K., Kawamoto, K. (2021). Software Engineering for Health Care and Biomedicine. In: Shortliffe, E.H., Cimino, J.J. (eds) Biomedical Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58721-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58721-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58720-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58721-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics