Skip to main content

On Contractual Approach in Competitive Economies with Constrained Coalitional Structures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mathematical Optimization Theory and Operations Research (MOTOR 2020)

Abstract

We establish a theorem that equilibria in an exchange economy can be described as allocations that are stable under the possibilities: (i) agents can partially and asymmetrically break current contracts, after that (ii) a new mutually beneficial contract can be concluded in a coalition of a size not more than 1 plus the maximum number of products that are not indifferent to the coalition members.

The presented result generalizes previous ones on a Pareto improvement in an exchange economy with l commodities that requires the active participation of no more than \(l+1\) traders. This concerned with Pareto optimal allocations, but we also describe equilibria. Thus according to the contractual approach to arrive at equilibrium only coalitions of constrained size can be applied that essentially raise the confidence of contractual modeling.

The study was carried out within the framework of the state contract of the Sobolev Institute of Mathematics (project no. 0314-2019-0018).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here “solid” is equivalent to “having nonempty interior.”

  2. 2.

    The symbol \(\overline{A}\) denotes the closure of A and \(\setminus \) is set for the set-theoretical difference.

  3. 3.

    Otherwise, it would occur that an allocation realized via breaking contracts is not feasible.

  4. 4.

    This is not a contract, because its key property \( \sum _\mathcal{I}t_iv_i = 0 \) is violated.

  5. 5.

    A linear segment with ends \(a, b\in L\) is the set \( [ a,b]=\mathrm{conv}\{ a,b\}=\{\lambda a+(1-\lambda )b\mid 0\le \lambda \le 1\}\).

  6. 6.

    Conditions, providing this fact are well known in the literature, e.g. it can be irreducibility.

  7. 7.

    For example, an ordinary consumer on the market is not interested in all kinds of spare parts, parts and structural elements (bolts, nuts, gears, transistors ...).

  8. 8.

    Here we indirectly assume that all bundles we need belong to consumption set, i.e., \(((y_i)_{-j},\mathbf{e}_i^j)\), \(((x_i)_{-j},\mathbf{e}_i^j)\in X_i\); it is a specific constraint for \(X_i\), \(i\in \mathcal{I}\).

  9. 9.

    Under classical assumptions they are equivalent, but it is not so in general case.

References

  1. Marakulin, V.M.: Contracts and domination in competitive economies. J. New Econ. Assoc. 9, 10–32 (2011). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marakulin, V.M.: On the Edgeworth conjecture for production economies with public goods: a contract-based approach. J. Math. Econ. 49(3), 189–200 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Marakulin, V.M.: On contractual approach for Arrow-Debreu-McKenzie economies. Econ. Math. Methods 50(1), 61–79 (2014). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marakulin, V.M.: Contracts and domination in incomplete markets: what is a true core? Econ. Theory Bull. 5(1), 81–108 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-016-0105-0

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Green, J.R.: The stability of Edgeworth’s recontracting process. Econometrica 42, 21–34 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Graham, D.A., Weintraub, E.R.: On convergence to Pareto allocations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 42, 469–472 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Madden, P.J.: Efficient sequences of non-monetary exchange. Rev. Econ. Stud. 42(4), 581–595 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Graham, D.A., Jennergren, L.P., Peterson, D.P., Weintraub, E.R.: Trader-commodity parity theorems. J. Econ. Theory 12, 443–454 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Polterovich, V.M.: Mathematical models of resources allocations. Central Economic and Mathematical Institute, Moscow, 107 p. (1970). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldman, S.M., Starr, R.M.: Pairwise, t-wise, and Pareto optimalities. Econometrica 50(3), 593–606 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valeriy Marakulin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Marakulin, V. (2020). On Contractual Approach in Competitive Economies with Constrained Coalitional Structures. In: Kochetov, Y., Bykadorov, I., Gruzdeva, T. (eds) Mathematical Optimization Theory and Operations Research. MOTOR 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1275. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58657-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58657-7_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58656-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58657-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics