Abstract
A fundamental characteristic of energy markets is their vulnerability to the presence of market power, which is that one or more suppliers can influence market prices. This vulnerability is related to a number of factors: low price sensitivity of demand, inflexibility of supply, limited abilities to store energy, and restricted capacities of the transportation network. These characteristics are discussed in Sect. 9.3. First, Sect. 9.2 discusses the general conditions and welfare consequences of the presence of firms using market power. Afterwards, Sect. 9.4 discusses how the presence and use of market power in energy markets can be monitored. Finally, Sect. 9.5 discusses a number of regulatory options to address the market failure of market power.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Actually, the equilibrium price can be a bit higher as this supplier can charge a price equal to the WTP of the marginal buyer, as no other supplier is able to offer the product at a lower price.
- 2.
This was first formulated by Adam Smith in his An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776) as: ‘Consumption is the sole end and purpose of all production; and the interest of the producer ought to be attended to only so far as it may be necessary for promoting that of the consumer’.
- 3.
The HHI can be calculated through measures for market shares expressed as percentages or as perunages (i.e. percentage divided by 100). In the former case, the HHI varies between 0 and 10,000, in the latter between 0 and 1.
- 4.
Cournot competition is where suppliers compete in the number of quantities they offer to the market instead of the prices they ask.
- 5.
In such cases regulation (or in general, policy) is captured by interest groups, in particular the incumbent industry.
References
BP. (2019). Statistical review of world energy (68th ed.).
Creti, A., & Fontini, F. (2019). Economics of electricity: Markets, competition and rules. Cambridge University Press.
Léautier, T.-O. (2018). Imperfect markets and imperfect regulation; An introduction to the microeconomics and political economy of power markets. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Motta, M. (2004). Competition policy; Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Mulder, M. (2015). Competition in the Dutch electricity wholesale market: An empirical analysis over 2006–2011. The Energy Journal, 36(2), 1–28.
Mulder, M., & Willems, B. (2019). The Dutch retail electricity market. Energy Policy, 127, 228–239.
Nersesian, R. L. (2016). Energy economics; Markets, history and policy. London/New York: Routledge.
Ofgem. (2011). Do energy bills respond faster to rising costs than falling costs? London, 21 March.
Perman, R. Y., Ma, J. M., & Common, M. (1999). Natural resource & environmental economics. England: Pearson Education Limited.
RBB Economics. (2014). Cost pass-through: Theory, measurement, and potential policy implications; A report prepared for the Office of Fair Trading, February.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Exercises
Exercises
9.1 What is the difference between ability and incentive to use market power?
9.2 What is difference between economic and physical withholding?
9.3 How does the presence of storage affect market power?
9.4 Why is the Lerner index not a perfect measure in electricity markets?
9.5 How can demand flexibility be stimulated in energy markets?
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mulder, M. (2021). Market Power in Wholesale and Retail Energy Markets. In: Regulation of Energy Markets. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 80. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58319-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58319-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58318-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58319-4
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)