Advertisement

The Individuality of Experience in Organizational Life

Chapter
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter introduces concepts such as intentionality, situatedness, historicity, understanding, noema and noesis as it develops the epistemological and ultimately phenomenological foundation for being and organizational interactions. It introduces an understanding of the human being, and the tradition and the arguments for the world as a social and individual phenomenon. It highlights some of the important concepts of human beings used later as central for the discussion of humans and organizations, for example consciousness, intentionality, understanding, self-awareness and critique. The focus is on building an ontology and epistemology for understanding the essence of being and being together in organizations.

Keywords

The subject Consciousness Thinking Being Understanding Lifeworld Intentionality Historicity Mind and body 

References

  1. Berger, P L.: “Invitation til Sociologi – ett humanistisk perspektiv”. Rabén & Sjögren, Stockholm, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. Bjurwill, C.: “Fenomenologi”. Studenlitteratur, Lund, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. Bengtsson, J.: “Sammanflätningar – Husserls och Merleau-Pontys fenomenologi”. Daidalos, Uddevalla, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P L & Luckmann, T: “The Social Construction of Reality – a treatise in the sociology of knowledge”. Doubleday & Company, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. Burrell, G & Morgan, G: “Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis”. Heinemann, London, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. Gadamer, H-G: “Reason in the Age of Science”. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. Gadamer, H-G: “Truth and Method”. Sheed & Ward, London, 1993 (1960).Google Scholar
  8. Gelven, M.: “A commentary on Heidegger’s being and time”. Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalb, Illinois, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. Giddens, A.: “Hermeneutics, Ethnomethodology, and problems of interpretative analysis”. In L A Coser & O N Larsen (eds): “The uses of controversy in sociology”, The Free Press, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. Gurwitsch, A.: “Husserl’s Theory of the Intentionality of Consciousness”. In Dreyfus, H L. (ed): “Husserl Intentionality and Cognitive Science”, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. Heidegger, M.: “Being and time”. (1927) Blackwell, Oxford, 1992.Google Scholar
  12. Husserl, E.: “Ideas”. Macmillan, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
  13. Kant, I. “Critique of pure reason” (“Kritiken der reinen Vernunft” (1781/1787)). Macmillan, Hong Kong, 1929.Google Scholar
  14. Merleau-Ponty, M.: “The Phenomenology of Perception”. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1994 (1962).Google Scholar
  15. Moustakas, C: “Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage, California 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Neill, J.: “Can phenomenology be critical?”. In Luckmann, T (ed.): “Phenomenology and sociology”, Penguin, London, 1978.Google Scholar
  17. Sartre, J-P: Being and Nothingness”, Washington Square Press, N.Y., 1956.Google Scholar
  18. Schutz, A: “Hverdagslivets sociologi”. Hans Reitzel, København, 1973b.Google Scholar
  19. Schutz, A: “Collected Papers I: The problem of social reality”. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.Google Scholar
  20. Schutz, A: “The phenomenology of the social world”. Heinemann Educational Books, London, 1972.Google Scholar
  21. Schutz, A: “Concepts and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences”. In Emmet D & Macintyre A (ed.): “Sociological theory and philosophical analysis”. The Macmillan Company, New York, 1978a.Google Scholar
  22. Schutz, A: “The theory of social action”. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and London, 1978b.Google Scholar
  23. Schutz, A: “Some leading concepts of phenomenology”. In Collected Papers I: “The problem of social reality”. Matinus Nijhoff, Haag, 1973a.Google Scholar
  24. Silverman, D: “The Theory of Organisations”. Heinemann, London, 1983.Google Scholar
  25. White, J D.: “Phenomenology and Organizational development”. Administrative Science Quarterly, Spring 1990.Google Scholar
  26. Wind, H C.: “Historie og forståelse—filosofisk hermeneutik”. Aarhus Universitetsforlag, Aarhus, Denmark, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aalborg University Business SchoolAalborgDenmark
  2. 2.University College Northern DenmarkUCN Technology & BusinessAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations