Skip to main content

Explainable AI in Manufacturing: A Predictive Maintenance Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Production Management Systems. Towards Smart and Digital Manufacturing (APMS 2020)

Abstract

This paper describes an example of an explainable AI (Artificial Intelligence) (XAI) in a form of Predictive Maintenance (PdM) scenario for manufacturing. Predictive maintenance has the potential of saving a lot of money by reducing and predicting machine breakdown. In this case study we work with generalized data to show how this scenario could look like with real production data. For this purpose, we created and evaluated a machine learning model based on a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree in order to predict machine errors or tool failures. Although the case study is strictly experimental, we can conclude that explainable AI in form of focused analytic and reliable prediction model can reasonably contribute to prediction of maintenance tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.darpa.mil/program/explainable-artificial-intelligence.

  2. 2.

    https://gallery.azure.ai/Experiment/Predictive-Maintenance-Implementation-Guide-Data-Sets-1.

  3. 3.

    https://lightgbm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.

References

  1. Lee, W.J., Wu, H., Yun, H., Kim, H., Jun, M.B., Sutherland, J.W.: Predictive maintenance of machine tool systems using artificial intelligence techniques applied to machine condition data. Procedia CIRP 80, 506–511 (2019). 26th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering (LCE) Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA May 7–9, 2019

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, T.W.: Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), the goodness criteria and the grasp-ability test. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.09598 (2018)

  3. Biran, O., Cotton, C.V.: Explanation and justification in machine learning: a survey or (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bornstein, A.M.: Is artificial intelligence permanently inscrutable?

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clancey, W.J.: Intelligent tutoring systems: a tutorial survey. Technical report, Stanford Univ CA Dept of Computer Science (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Core, M.G., Lane, H.C., Van Lent, M., Gomboc, D., Solomon, S., Rosenberg, M.: Building explainable artificial intelligence systems. In: AAAI, pp. 1766–1773 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hawkins, J.: Special report: can we copy the brain?-what intelligent machines need to learn from the neocortex. IEEE Spectr. 54(6), 34–71 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marcus, G.: Deep learning: A critical appraisal. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.00631 (2018)

  9. Monroe, D.: AI, explain yourself. Commun. ACM 61(11), 11–13 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheh, R.K.M.: “Why did you do that?” explainable intelligent robots. In: Workshops at the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Voosen, P.: How AI detectives are craking open the black box of deep learning. Science (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, D., Yang, Q., Abdul, A., Lim, B.Y.: Designing theory-driven user-centric explainable AI. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–15 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weinberger, D.: Our machines now have knowledge we’ll never understand. Backchannel (2017). https://www.wired.com/story/our-machines-now-have-knowledge-well-never-understand

  14. Susto, G.A., Schirru, A., Pampuri, S., Mcloone, S., Beghi, A.: Machine learning for predictive maintenance: a multiple classifier approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 11, 812–820 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Selcuk, S.: Predictive maintenance, its implementation and latest trends. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 231(9), 1670–1679 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ke, G., et al.: LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In: Guyon, I., et al. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, pp. 3146–3154. Curran Associates, Inc. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selver Softic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hrnjica, B., Softic, S. (2020). Explainable AI in Manufacturing: A Predictive Maintenance Case Study. In: Lalic, B., Majstorovic, V., Marjanovic, U., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Towards Smart and Digital Manufacturing. APMS 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 592. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57997-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57997-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57996-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57997-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics