Abstract
Global production companies spend a noticeable amount of resources on developing lean subprograms deployed within the corporate group. Despite the objective of achieving overall improvements, the expected performance might default due to inefficient deployment processes. Unforeseen lag or resistance to centralized programs has in previous studies shown to be influenced by contextual characteristics of the recipient, such as absorptive capacity, national culture, and factory size. How should deployment plans be designed while considering the characteristics within the corporate group? The research purpose here, is to explore the intentions and reasoning behind the designed deployment plan within a corporate group. Based on insights from a real case, this paper presents three various tactical deployment approaches of possible eight theoretical configurations, here called ‘horizontal,’ ‘parallel,’ and ‘delegated’ deployment. They differ principally by cascading approach, degree of freedom, and centralization of targets. The concept of ‘deployment tactics’ is introduced as a way to understand how the deployment plans are arranged given the contextual characteristics, and shows that the context dependency in lean subprogram deployment can be managed in various ways within a company.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Netland, T.: Exploring the phenomenon of company-specific production systems: one-best-way or own-best-way? Int. J. Prod. Res. 51, 1084–1097 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.676686
Netland, T.H., Aspelund, A.: Multi-plant improvement programmes: a literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 34, 390–418 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-02-2012-0087
Bellgran, M.: A corporate perspective on global management and development of lean production systems: a case study. In: Handbook of Research on Design and Management of Lean Production Systems, pp. 270–289. IGI Global (2014)
Netland, T.H., Aspelund, A.: Company-specific production systems and competitive advantage a resource-based view on the Volvo production system. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 33, 1511–1531 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2010-0171
Scherrer-Rathje, M., Boyle, T.A., Deflorin, P.: Lean, take two! Reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation. Bus. Horiz. 52, 79–88 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2008.08.004
Danese, P., Romano, P., Boscari, S.: The transfer process of lean practices in multi-plant companies. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 37, 468–488 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-12-2014-0571
Jadhav, J.R., Mantha, S.S., Rane, S.B.: Exploring barriers in lean implementation. Int. J. Lean. Six Sigma 5, 122–148 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-12-2012-0014
Shah, R., Ward, P.T.: Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. J. Oper. Manag. 21, 129–149 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00108-0
Netland, T.H.: Coordinating production improvement in international production networks: what’s new. In: Johansen, J., Farooq, S., Cheng, Y. (eds.) International Operations Networks, pp. 119–132. Springer, London (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5646-8_8
Scherrer, M., Deflorin, P.: Linking QFD and the manufacturing network strategy: integrating the site and network perspectives. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 37, 226–255 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2014-0350
Netland, T.H., Sanchez, E.: Effects of a production improvement programme on global quality performance: the case of the Volvo Production System. TQM J. 26, 188–201 (2014)
Demeter, K., Losonci, D.: Transferring lean knowledge within multinational networks. Prod. Plan Control 30, 211–224 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1534272
Maritan, C.A., Brush, T.H.: Heterogeneity and transferring practices: implementing flow manufacturing in multiple plants. Strateg. Manag. J. 24, 945–959 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.311
Netland, T.H.: Critical success factors for implementing lean production: the effect of contingencies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 54, 2433–2448 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1096976
Boscari, S., Danese, P., Romano, P.: Implementation of lean production in multinational corporations: a case study of the transfer process from headquarters to subsidiaries. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 176, 53–68 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.013
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn. SAGE, London (2009)
Liker, J.K.: The Toyota Way 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer. McGraw-Hill Education, New York (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Linderson, S., Bellgran, M., Birkie, S.E. (2020). Insights from a Top-Down Lean Subprogram Deployment in a Production Group: A Tactical Perspective. In: Lalic, B., Majstorovic, V., Marjanovic, U., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Digital Transformation and Innovation of Production Management Systems. APMS 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 591. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57993-7_66
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57993-7_66
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57992-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57993-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
