Abstract
Delayed differentiation, one of the key techniques of mass customization, has proven to be a high-performance strategy in the discrete industry. In the process industry, however, it remains poorly explored, especially when differentiation relates to product composition rather than form. Reverse Blending is a new OR blending problem based on a quadratic formulation, where output requirements are similar to those of classical blending, but here inputs are not preexisting and must be defined simultaneously with their use in the blending process while exactly meeting output requirements. These may then be used to obtain a wide variety of custom fertilizers (outputs) from a small number of Canonical Basis Inputs that can be blended outside the chemical plant, close to the endusers. This would avoid production of a wide variety of small batches of final products through a small number of large batches of intermediate products, resulting in valuable logistical streamlining and substantial cost savings. Accordingly, our paper investigates the potential benefits of implementing Reverse Blending in the fertilizer industry.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Incrocci, L., Massa, D., Pardossi, A.: New trends in the fertigation management of irrigated vegetable crops. Horticulturae 3(2), 37 (2017)
Salvador, F., Forza, C., Rungtusanatham, M.: Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: theorizing beyond generic prescriptions. J. Oper. Manag. 20(5), 549–575 (2002)
Da Cunha Reis, A., Scavarda, L.F., Pancieri, B.M.: Product variety management: a synthesis of existing research. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 7(1), 39 (2013)
Johnson, M.D., Kirchain, R.E.: Quantifying the effects of product family decisions on material selection: a process-based costing approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 120(2), 653–668 (2009)
Boone, C.A., Craighead, C.W., Hanna, J.B.: Postponement: an evolving supply chain concept. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logistics Manag. 37, 597–611 (2007)
Van Hoek, R.I.: The rediscovery of postponement a literature review and directions for research. J. Oper. Manag. 19(2), 161–184 (2001)
Kerkkänen, A.: Determining semi-finished products to be stocked when changing the MTS- MTO policy: case of a steel mill. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 108(1–2), 111–118 (2007)
Benhamou, L., Giard, V., Khouloud, M., Fenies, P., Fontane, F.: Reverse blending : an economically efficient approach to the challenge of fertilizer mass customization. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 226, 107603 (2019)
Karam, A.-A., Liviu, M., Cristina, V., Radu, H.: The contribution of lean manufacturing tools to changeover time decrease in the pharmaceutical industry. A SMED Proj. Procedia Manuf. 22(886), 892 (2018)
Chang, J.C., Graves, S.C., Kirchain, R.E., Olivetti, E.A.: Integrated planning for design and production in two-stage recycling operations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 273(2), 535–547 (2019)
Sharda, B., Akiya, N.: Selecting make-to-stock and postponement policies for different products in a chemical plant: a case study using discrete event simulation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 136(1), 161–171 (2012)
Gupta, D., Benjaafar, S.: Make-to-order, make-to-stock, or delay product differentiation? A common framework for modeling and analysis. IIE Trans. 36(6), 529–546 (2004)
Agra, A., Poss, M., Santos, M.: Optimizing make-to-stock policies through a robust lot- sizing model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 200, 302–310 (2018)
Morikawa, K., Takahashi, K., Hirotani, D.: Make-to-stock policies for a multistage serial system under a make-to-order production environment. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 147, 30–37 (2014)
Soman, C.A., Van Donk, D.P., Gaalman, G.: Combined make-to-order and make-to-stock in a food production system. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 90(2), 223–235 (2004)
Jewkes, E.M., Alfa, A.S.: A queueing model of delayed product differentiation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 199(3), 734–743 (2009)
Fornasiero, R., Macchion, L., Vinelli, A.: Supply chain configuration towards customization: a comparison between small and large series production. IFAC- PapersOnLine 48(3), 1428–1433 (2015)
Tyagi, S.: Optimization of a platform configuration with generational changes. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 169, 299–309 (2015)
Gungor, Z.E., Evans, S.: Understanding the hidden cost and identifying the root causes of changeover impacts. J. Clean. Prod. 167, 1138–1147 (2017)
Ferradás, P.G., Salonitis, K.: Improving changeover time: a tailored SMED approach for welding cells. Procedia CIRP 7, 598–603 (2013)
Meixell, M.J.: The impact of setup costs, commonality, and capacity on schedule stability: an exploratory study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 95(1), 95–107 (2005)
Grundemann, L., Gonschorowski, V., Fischer, N., Scholl, S.: Cleaning waste minimization for multiproduct plants: transferring macro batch to micro conti manufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 24(92), 101 (2012)
Karasu, M.K., Cakmakci, M., Cakiroglu, M.B., Ayva, E., Demirel-Ortabas, N.: Improvement of changeover times via Taguchi empowered SMED/case study on injection molding production. Measurement 47(741), 748 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Benhamou, L., Fenies, P., Giard, V. (2020). Potential Benefits of Reverse Blending in the Fertilizer Industry. In: Lalic, B., Majstorovic, V., Marjanovic, U., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Digital Transformation and Innovation of Production Management Systems. APMS 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 591. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57993-7_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57993-7_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57992-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57993-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
