Skip to main content

A Study on Visual and Structural Characteristics of Landmarks and Experts’ and Non-experts’ Evaluations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Spatial Cognition XII (Spatial Cognition 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12162))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of this study is to understand what makes a landmark more salient and to explore whether assessments of saliency vary between experts and non-experts. We hypothesize that non-experts’ saliency judgments will agree with those of the experts. Secondly, we hypothesize that not only visual characteristics but also structural characteristics make landmarks salient and that the size and visibility of objects are important for them to be considered as salient. To test our hypotheses, an online navigation game, Sea Hero Quest (SHQ), was used and two levels of the game were selected as the case study. The characteristics of these levels were evaluated by non-experts and experts in the field. Our results suggest that both visual and structural characteristics of landmarks make them more salient. We also discovered that experts’ saliency evaluations are mostly consistent with non-experts’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Downs, R.M., Stea, D.: Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: process and products. In: The Map Reader: Theories of Mapping Practice and Cartographic Representation. pp. 8–26. Wiley (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470979587.ch41

  2. Michon, P.-E., Denis, M.: When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) Spatial Information Theory, pp. 292–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Philbeck, J.W., O’Leary, S.: Remembered landmarks enhance the precision of path integration. Psicologica 26, 7–24 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Couclelis, H., Golledge, R.G., Gale, N., Tobler, W.: Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition. J. Environ. Psychol. 7, 99–122 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(87)80020-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tlauka, M., Wilson, P.N.: The effect of landmarks on route-learning in a computer-simulated environment. J. Environ. Psychol. 14, 305–313 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sorrows, M.E., Hirtle, S.C.: The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces. In: International Conference on Spatial Information Theory. pp. 37–50. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5

  7. Caduff, D., Timpf, S.: On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation. Cogn. Process. 9, 249–267 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0199-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peters, D., Wu, Y., Winter, S.: Testing landmark identification theories in virtual environments. In: Hölscher, C., Shipley, T.F., Olivetti Belardinelli, M., Bateman, J.A., Newcombe, N.S. (eds.) Spatial Cognition VII, pp. 54–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Stankiewicz, B.J., Kalia, A.A.: Acquistion of structural versus object landmark knowledge. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 33, 378–390 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Winter, S., Raubal, M., Nothegger, C.: Focalizing measures of salience for wayfinding. In: Map-based Mobile Services: Theories, Methods and Implementations. pp. 125–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26982-7_9

  11. Albrecht, R., von Stuelpnagel, R.: Memory for salient landmarks: empirical findings and a cognitive model. In: Creem-Regehr, S., Schöning, J., Klippel, A. (eds.) Spatial Cognition 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11034, pp. 311–325. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96385-3_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Hölscher, C., Dalton, R.C.: Comprehension of layout complexity: Effects of architectural expertise and mode of presentation. In: Gero, J.S., Goel, A.K. (eds.) Design Computing and Cognition 2008, pp. 159–178. Springer, Dordrecht (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tenbrink, T., Hoelscher, C., Tsigaridi, D., Dalton, R.: Cognition and communication in architectural design. In: Montello, D., Grossner, K., Janelle, D. (eds.) Space in Mind: Concepts for Spatial Learning and Education, pp. 263–280. The MIT Press, United States (2014). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9811.003.0014

  14. Cheng, S.-Y.: Suburban landmarks in north arlington: perceptions of experts and non-experts (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Coutrot, A., et al.: Global determinants of navigation ability. Curr. Biol. 28, 2861–2866.e4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CUB.2018.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hillier, B., Hanson, J.: The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Yesiltepe, D., et al.: Usage of landmarks in virtual environments for wayfinding: research on the influence of global landmarks. In: 12th International Space Syntax Symposium, pp. 220-1–220-10, Beijing (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Raubal, M., Winter, S.: Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Mark, D.M. (eds.) GIScience 2002. LNCS, vol. 2478, pp. 243–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45799-2_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Sadeghian, P., Kantardzic, M.: The new generation of automatic landmark detection systems: challenges and guidelines. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 8, 252–287 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13875860802039257

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Saskia Kuliga for her suggestions about the survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demet Yesiltepe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yesiltepe, D., Dalton, R.C., Ozbil Torun, A., Coutrot, A., Hornberger, M., Spiers, H. (2020). A Study on Visual and Structural Characteristics of Landmarks and Experts’ and Non-experts’ Evaluations. In: Šķilters, J., Newcombe, N., Uttal, D. (eds) Spatial Cognition XII. Spatial Cognition 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12162. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57982-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57983-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics