Skip to main content

Applying Psychophysics to Applied Spatial Cognition Research

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Spatial Cognition XII (Spatial Cognition 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12162))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 756 Accesses

Abstract

Applied spatial cognition research uses many different methods [1], but studies involving psychophysical methods remain quite rare. Here, we argue for the usefulness of psychophysical methods in spatial cognition and use them to address an applied research question. In the present study, we were interested in how sensitive humans are in detecting mismatches between map perspective and the first-person-view of an environment, and whether they exhibit biases in the perception of street angles. We demonstrate that Psychophysics is well-suited to approach these research questions, and provide the reader with a step-by-step description of how we developed our psychophysical study. In particular, we report which problems have to be solved when combining psychophysical methods with complex stimuli often encountered in spatial cognition, e.g. involving complex VR environments, and present our solutions for experimental design and data collection.

J. Frankenstein and F. Kessler—Contributed equally to this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Newcombe, N.: Methods for the study of spatial cognition. Dev. Spat. Cogn. 277, 303–326 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huynh, N.T., Doherty, S.T.: Digital sketch-map drawing as an instrument to collect data about spatial cognition. Cartographica 42, 285–296 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frankenstein, J., Mohler, B.J., Bülthoff, H.H., Meilinger, T.: Is the map in our head oriented north? Psychol. Sci. 23, 120–125 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hölscher, C., Tenbrink, T., Wiener, J.M.: Would you follow your own route description? Cognitive strategies in urban route planning. Cognition 121, 228–247 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Richardson, A.E., Montello, D.R., Hegarty, M.: Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Mem. Cogn. 27, 741–750 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diersch, N., Wolbers, T.: The potential of virtual reality for spatial navigation research across the adult lifespan (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vandenberg, S.G., Kuse, A.R.: Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Percept. Mot. Skills 47, 599–604 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M.: A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Mem. Cogn. 29, 745–756 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Waskom, M.L., Okazawa, G., Kiani, R.: Designing and interpreting psychophysical investigations of cognition. Neuron 104, 100–112 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dai, R., Thomas, A.K., Taylor, H.A.: When to look at maps in navigation: metacognitive control in environment learning. Cogn. Res.: Princ. Implic. 3, 36 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Levine, M., Jankovic, I.N., Palij, M.: Principles of spatial problem solving. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 111(2), 157–175 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gescheider, G.A.: The classical psychophysical methods. Psychophys.: Fundam. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gibson, J.J., Fechner, G.T.: Elemente der Psychophysik, vol. 2. Breitkopf und Härtel, Leipzig (1860)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Read, J.C.: The place of human psychophysics in modern neuroscience. Neuroscience 296, 116–129 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stevens, S.S.: To honor Fechner and repeal his law. Science 133, 80–86 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Appelle, S.: Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the “oblique effect” in man and animals. Psychol. Bull. 78(4), 266 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Girshick, A.R., Landy, M.S., Simoncelli, E.P.: Cardinal rules: visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 926–932 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Macke, J.H., Wichmann, F.A.: Estimating predictive stimulus features from psychophysical data: the decision image technique applied to human faces. J. Vis. 10(5), 1–24 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanjay, H.S., Bhargavi, S., Madhuri, S.: Auditory psychophysical analysis of healthy individuals based on audiometry and absolute threshold tests. Int. J. Eng. Technol. (UAE) 7, 99–106 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pelli, D.G., Bex, P.: Measuring contrast sensitivity. Vis. Res. 90, 10–14 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wichmann, F.A., Jäkel, F.: Methods in Psychophysics. Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, pp. 1–42. Wiley, Hoboken (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bohil, C.J., Alicea, B., Biocca, F.A.: Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 752–762 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mallot, H.A., Gillner, S., van Veen, H.A.H.C., Bülthoff, H.H.: Behavioral experiments in spatial cognition using virtual reality. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1404, pp. 447–467. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Kingdom, F.A., Prins, N.: Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction, 2nd edn. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Leek, M.R.: Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 1279–1292 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jäkel, F., Wichmann, F.A.: Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for Naïve observers. J. Vis. 6, 13–13 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith, P.L., Little, D.R.: Small is beautiful: in defense of the small-N design. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 2083–2101 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schütt, H.H., Harmeling, S., Macke, J.H., Wichmann, F.A.: Painfree and accurate Bayesian estimation of psychometric functions for (potentially) overdispersed data. Vis. Res. 122, 105–123 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Linares, D., López-Moliner, J.: quickpsy: an R package to fit psychometric functions for multiple groups. R J. 8, 122–131 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ishikawa, T., Montello, D.R.: Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cogn. Psychol. 52, 93–129 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Green, D.M., Swets, J.A.: Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics, vol. 1. Wiley, New York (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pecher, D., Zwaan, R.A.: Grounding cognition: the role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Frank Jäkel for his help in designing the experiment, our patient colleagues for their feedback during piloting, and our participants for providing their data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Frankenstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Frankenstein, J., Kessler, F., Rothkopf, C. (2020). Applying Psychophysics to Applied Spatial Cognition Research. In: Šķilters, J., Newcombe, N., Uttal, D. (eds) Spatial Cognition XII. Spatial Cognition 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12162. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57982-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57983-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics