Skip to main content

Motivation and Persuasion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fundamental Theories of Business Communication

Abstract

Motivation and persuasion are at the heart of most organizational communication. In fact, many business communication theories are linked to rhetoric, a key theory in this category. Simply stated, motivational and persuasive messages guide how we get things done in organizations. Just as important, these same messages impact the well-being of organizational stakeholders—employees, and customers included of course. Yet there are different paths to modeling these processes within business communication theory, and this chapter captures some major approaches. We also touch upon some compelling issues for scholars and managers here. Have we fully considered and taken action about relevant ethical implications? And, have we effectively partnered theories in this category with pertinent ones from cultural characteristics and organizational structures to better explore organizational communication behaviors and their meaningful outcomes?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adame, E. A., & Bisel, R. S. (2019). Can perceptions of an individual’s organizational citizenship be influenced via strategic impression management messaging? International Journal of Business Communication,56(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415627355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. (2013). Communication, power and organization (Vol. 72). Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. D. (1999). Ancient rhetorical theory and Paul (Vol. 18). College Prowler, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, F. J., Thomas, G. F., & Hocevar, S. P. (1995). The central role of discourse in large-scale change: A social construction perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,31(3), 352–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisel, R. S. (2017). Organizational moral learning: A communication approach. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisel, R. S., & Adame, E. A. (2019). Encouraging upward ethical dissent in organizations: The role of deference to embodied expertise. Management Communication Quarterly,33(2), 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisel, R. S., Messersmith, A. S., & Kelley, K. M. (2012). Supervisor-subordinate communication: Hierarchical mum effect meets organizational learning. The Journal of Business Communication,49(2), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612436972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, E. (1978). Rhetorical criticism: A study in method. University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, E. (1988). Secrecy and disclosure as rhetorical forms. Quarterly Journal of Speech,74(2), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. B. (1993). Reputation, image and impression management. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., Adler, N. J., Mintzberg, H., Cooren, F., Suddaby, R., Freeman, R. E., & Laasch, O. (2020). What “are” responsible management? A conceptual potluck. In The research handbook of responsible management (pp. 56–72). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitude and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology,32(1), 357–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A. (1998). The necessary art of persuasion. Harvard Business Review,76(3), 84–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyphert, D. (2010). The rhetorical analysis of business speech: Unresolved questions. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 47(3), 346–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610370577.

  • Dulek, R. E., & Campbell, K. S. (2015). On the dark side of strategic communication. International Journal of Business Communication,52(1), 122–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd-Lapp, C. (2014). Aristotle’s rhetoric: The power of words and the continued relevance of persuasion. Young Historians Conference, Portland State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. In Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory, pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanke, D. (2020). Can employees motivate themselves? The link between peer motivating language and employee outcomes (Unpublished Dissertation). Texas A&M International University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review,28(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Q. K., Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2018). Keep them on-board! How organizations can develop employee embeddedness to increase employee retention. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal,32(4), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-11-2017-0094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., & Salas, E. (2017). Communication in virtual teams: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review,27(4), 575–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, J. (1993). The role of motivating language in leader-member exchange (Unpublished Dissertation). University of Alabama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (1995). Learning the language of leadership: A proposed agenda for leader training. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies,2(1), 132–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199500200111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2014). Step by step to better performance: Organizational-citizenship behavior can transform employees and the workplace. Human Resource Management International Digest,22(4), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/HRMID-07-2014-0087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2018). Motivating language theory: Effective leader talk in the workplace. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2019a). The diffusion process of strategic motivating language: An examination of the internal organizational environment and emergent properties. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(3), 366–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416629093.

  • Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2019b). A commentary on “the call center agent’s performance paradox: A mixed-methods study of discourse strategies and paradox resolution.” Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(2), 205–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0096.

  • Mayfield, J., Mayfield, M., & Neck, C. P. (in press). Speaking to the self: How motivating language links with self-leadership. International Journal of Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417731861.

  • Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2012). Effective performance feedback for learning in organizations and organizational learning. Development and Learning in Organizations,26(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777281211189128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2017a). Leader talk and the creative spark: A research note on how leader motivating language use influences follower creative environment perceptions. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416687057.

  • Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2017b). “What’s past is prologue”: A look at past leadership communication research with a view toward the future. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416687050.

  • Seeger, M. W., & Ulmer, R. R. (2003). Explaining Enron: Communication and responsible leadership. Management Communication Quarterly,17(1), 58–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharbrough, W. C., Simmons, S. A., & Cantrill, D. A. (2006). Motivating language in industry: Its impact on job satisfaction and perceived supervisor effectiveness. Journal of Business Communication,43(4), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943606291712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, A. S., & Roper, S. (2019). The ethics of gamification in a marketing context. Journal of Business Ethics,155(2), 597–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. D., & Coleman, R. (2009). Advancing agenda-setting theory: The comparative strength and new contingent conditions of the two levels of agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,86(4), 775–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline Mayfield .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mayfield, M., Mayfield, J., Walker, R. (2020). Motivation and Persuasion. In: Fundamental Theories of Business Communication. New Perspectives in Organizational Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57741-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics