Skip to main content

Preventing Autonomy: European Interests and the Application of a Standard of Civilization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Civilization and the Making of the State in Lebanon and Syria

Part of the book series: Middle East Today ((MIET))

  • 262 Accesses

Abstract

The standard of civilization, as it was applied to the Ottoman Empire and, subsequently, to the French Mandates of Lebanon and Syria, produced a set of material and immaterial benchmarks. As such, the populations were required to accede to a set of socio-political norms as well as apply modernization reforms that replicated the institutions and structures of statehood in Europe. However, and as discussed in this chapter, the standard of civilization became intertwined with the interests of European states. Because the civilizing project and modernization reforms, being the products of a standard of civilization, could not be divorced from political and economic interests, the standard that was required of the Ottoman Empire, Lebanon, and Syria continued to shift. The result was the continued subordination of the Ottoman Empire and the Syrian provinces, the continuation of the civilizing project, and—as such—the continued application of imperial interference and intervention. This is evident throughout the Tanzimat period as well as the French Mandate period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Hünkâr İskelesi Agreement (1833) was followed by the Treaty of Munchengraetz on September 18, 1833. The latter was an agreement signed between Russia, Austria, and Prussia to protect the sovereignty of the monarchy should it be threatened. Following the eight-year term of the Hünkâr İskelesi Agreement, a new treaty had been signed in London, The Straits Convention, July 13, 1841, which outlined the legal status of the Straits and significantly reduced Ottoman sovereignty of the waterways (Beydilli 2001, pp. 86–91).

  2. 2.

    FO/78/410, TNA, January 23, 1840, from N.W. Ulerry in Damascus to John Bidwell.

  3. 3.

    FO/78/410, TNA, January 18, 1840, from N.W. Ulerry in Damascus to Lord Palmerston, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs; June 23, 1840 (no. 9), from N.W. Ulerry, Damascus to Lord Palmerston, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.

  4. 4.

    FO/78/243, TNA, February 7, 1834, from J.W. Farren in Damascus to Lord Palmerston, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs; FO/78/252, TNA, January 13, 1835, no. 14, from D. Sandison in Constantinople to Lord Posonb,.

  5. 5.

    FO/78/243, TNA, February 7, 1834, from J.W. Farren in Damascus to Lord Palmerston, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.

  6. 6.

    Although Farren admires the logics of the new social order under Egyptian forces, he is aware of its violence and brutality. FO/78/243, TNA, February 7, 1834, from J.W. Farren in Damascus to Lord Palmerston, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.

  7. 7.

    FO/78/410, TNA, January 18, 1840, from N.W. Ulerry in Damascus to Lord Palmerston, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs; June 23, 1840, no. 9, from N.W. Ulerry in Damascus to Lord Palmerston, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.

  8. 8.

    Convention of Commerce, Balta Liman, August 16, 1838.

  9. 9.

    The French consul writes that the English are making gains in the city of Aleppo through engaging with the indigenous population in the formation of trade agreements, 166PO/D1/46, CADN, March 12, 1840, no. 37, from Henry Guys in Aleppo to Duc de Dalmatie, President of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

  10. 10.

    FO/78/410, TNA, January 23, 1840, from N.W. Ulerry in Damascus to John Bidwell, Foreign Office.

  11. 11.

    18PO/A/11, CADN, November 5, 1840, ‘Séance Royale, Discours du Roi’.

  12. 12.

    166PO/D20/2, CADN, January 8, 1840, no. 7, from Comte de Ratti-Menton in Damascus to M. de Pontois, French Ambassador in Constantinople.

  13. 13.

    FO/78/410, TNA, January 23, 1840, from N.W. Ulerry in Damascus to John Bidwell, Foreign Office.

  14. 14.

    FO/78/410, TNA, January 23, 1840, from N.W. Ulerry in Damascus to John Bidwell, Foreign Office.

  15. 15.

    166PO/D1/46 January 21, 1840, CADN, no. 43, from Henry Guys, Aleppo to M. de Pontois, Special Envoy to Istanbul; 166PO/D20/2 January 8, 1840, CADN, no. 7, from Comte de Ratti-Menton, Damascus to M. de Pontois, French Ambassador in Constantinople.

  16. 16.

    FO/78/410, TNA, January 23, 1840, from N.W. Ulerry in Damascus to John Bidwell, Foreign Office.

  17. 17.

    FO/78/410, TNA, January 23, 1840, from N.W. Ulerry in Damascus to John Bidwell, Foreign Office.

  18. 18.

    The firman was a series of capitulations granted to France by Sultan Mahmud I (Slade 1867, pp. 63–74; Goldfrank 2013; Van Dyck 1881, p. 121).

  19. 19.

    The consul wrote back to England describing his interactions with the rebellious populations. He asked ‘them to yield obedience to their legitimate rulers, and to submit peaceably and quietly to the imperial ordinances in order to avoid the total ruin of their homes and country’. The consul further writes that opposition to Turkish Authority is also strong with the Sunnis (Mahometans), Shiites (Mutuwalies), and general population (Rayah), who wish for the British authority in Syria, to which the consul argues is caused by disaffection, FO/78/910, TNA, March 17, 1852, no. 9, from Richard Wood in Damascus to Stratford Canning.

  20. 20.

    The demands being exerted on the Sublime Porte by France came at a time when France was also demanding the release and safe passage of two prisoners being held by the Ottoman Empire. The prisoners, accused of blaspheme, were of French origin and had converted to Islam. They were charged with refusal to participate in Ramadan, which was followed by their seeking protection at the French Embassy where they professed to be of the Christian faith. The Sublime Porte, unwilling to hand over the prisoners on principle that they had broken significant laws and wanting to reinforce the right of authority was challenged by the French who moved their navy to the coast of Tripoli and threatened the Sublime Porte with the bombardment of the city until the prisoners were returned. Fearing the attack, the Ottoman authorities permitted the safe passage of the two prisoners (Slade 1867, pp. 63–74).

  21. 21.

    The French Consul in Aleppo writes of the Sultan’s position in the promulgation of the Tanzimat Decree. 166PO/D1/54, CADN, August 7, 1858, no. 15, from M. Bentivoglio in Aleppo to M. de Thouvenel, the French Ambassador in Istanbul.

  22. 22.

    In the Andrassy Note, Count Andrassy states that the Hatt-ı Hümayun ‘is one of the results of the solicitudes of the Powers’ (Hertslet 1875c, vol. 4, p. 2421); The text of the Hatt-ı Hümayun can be found in Hertslet (1875b, vol. 2, pp. 1243–1249); In the writings of Viscount Strangford (1869, p. 131), it is noted ‘we [Britain] have a right to look for some public expression of gratitude from Russia for putting into her hands so powerful a solvent of Turkish dominion as the Hatt-ı Hümayun’.

  23. 23.

    1SL/1/V/394, UK Parliamentary Archives, June 30, 1930, no. 131, ‘A/S du rapport de la France à la sociétè des nations sur la situation en Syrie’.

  24. 24.

    1SL/1/V/394, UK Parliamentary Archives, August 29, 1930, no. 177, ‘A/S de la constitution Syrienne à le commission des mandats’.

  25. 25.

    FO/141/453, TNA, March 19, 1924, no. 55, from M. Smart to M. MacDonald.

  26. 26.

    FO/684/1, TNA, January 1923, ‘French Intelligence Summaries’.

  27. 27.

    FO/684/1, TNA, January 1923, ‘French Intelligence Summaries’.

  28. 28.

    FO/684/1, TNA, January 1923, ‘French Intelligence Summaries’.

  29. 29.

    FO/684/1, TNA, January 1923, ‘French Intelligence Summaries’.

  30. 30.

    FO/684/1, TNA, January 1923, ‘French Intelligence Summaries’.

  31. 31.

    FO/684/1, TNA, July 4, 1924, no. 105, M. Smart in Damascus to British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.

  32. 32.

    FO/684/1, TNA, July 4, 1924, no. 105, M. Smart in Damascus to British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.

  33. 33.

    The articles included, Article 2, 73, 74, 75, and 112 of the Draft Constitution (Hourani 1946, pp. 191–193).

  34. 34.

    1SL/1/V/394, UK Parliamentary Archives, March 9, 1930, from Cheikh Ismail el Hariri.

  35. 35.

    1SL/1/V/394 March 9, 1930, from Cheikh Ismail el Hariri.

  36. 36.

    1SL/1/V/394 March 9, 1930, from Cheikh Ismail el Hariri.

  37. 37.

    1SL/1/V/394, UK Parliamentary Archives, September 10, 1936, ‘Manifeste du Bloc Nationaliste au novembre people Syrien’.

  38. 38.

    FO/226/234, TNA, ‘Telegram from Prodrome’; FO/226/237, TNA, ‘Internal Politics, Lebanon and Syria, Alleged British Interference’.

  39. 39.

    FO/226/240, TNA, January 7, 1943, ‘Elections’, from M. Lambert in Beirut.

  40. 40.

    The Fed’an were primarily located in the Syrian Euphrates (Lange 2006, pp. 940–966).

  41. 41.

    FO/226/240, TNA, February 9, 1943, from M. Lambert.

  42. 42.

    FO/226/240, TNA, March 22, 1943, ‘Conversation between Captain Arab and Dr. Ayyoub Tabet’.

  43. 43.

    FO/226/240, TNA, August 2, 1943, ‘Shukri Quwatli’s Speech delivered at the Dengiz Mosque on August 2nd, 1943’.

  44. 44.

    FO/226/240, TNA, January 7, 1943, ‘Elections’, from M. Lambert in Beirut’.

  45. 45.

    FO/226/252, TNA, ‘Internal Politics: Lebanon’.

Works Cited

  • Aksakal, Mustafa. 2011. The Limits of Diplomacy: The Ottoman Empire and the First World War. Foreign Policy Analysis 7 (2): 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anghie, Antony. 2004. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, James. 2011. A Line in the Sand: Britain, France and the Struggle That Shaped the Middle East. London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beydilli, Kemal. 2001. From Küçük Kaynarca to the Collapse. In History of the Ottoman State, Society and Civilisation, Vol. 1, ed. Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, 63–132. Istanbul: Research Centre for Islamic History, Art and Culture (IRCICA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalcraft, John. 2016. Popular Politics and the Making of the Modern Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Commins, David Dean. 1990. Islamic Reform: Politics and Social Change in late Ottoman Syria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, Roderic H. 1963. Reform in the Ottoman Empire, 1856–1876. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duxbury, Alison. 2011. The Participation of States in International Organizations: The Role of Human Rights and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • el-Solh, Raghid. 2004. Lebanon and Arabism: National Identity and State Formation. London: Centre for Lebanese Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fieldhouse, David Kenneth. 2008. Western Imperialism in the Middle East, 1914–1958. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Findley, Carter Vaughn. 1989. Ottoman Civil Officialdom: A Social History. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Firro, Kais. 2003. Inventing Lebanon: Nationalism and the State Under the French Mandate. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • French Mandate for Syria and the Lebanon. 1923. The American Journal of International Law 17 (3): 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfrank, David M. 2013. The Origins of the Crimean War. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertslet, Edward. 1875a. The Map of Europe by Treaty: Political and Territorial Changes Since the General Peace of 1814, vol. 1. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertslet, Edward. 1875b. The Map of Europe by Treaty: Political and Territorial Changes Since the General Peace of 1814, vol. 2. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertslet, Edward. 1875c. The Map of Europe by Treaty: Political and Territorial Changes Since the General Peace of 1814, vol. 4. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, Derek. 2014. Porfirii Uspenskii: A Russian observer of Near Eastern society. In Cohabitation et conflits dans le Bilad al-Cham a l’epoque Ottomane: Musulmans et Chretiens a travers les ecrits des chroniqueurs et des voyageurs, ed. Salim Daccache, Carla Edde, Stefan Knost, Bruno Paoli, and Souad Slim, 133–152. Lebanon: University of Balamand, Institut francais du Proche-Orient, Universite Saint-Joseph, Orient Institut Beirut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourani, Albert. 1946. Syria and Lebanon, a Political Essay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, Adel. 1976. Documents Diplomatiques et Consulaires Relatifs a l’Histoire du Liban et des Pays du Proche-Orient du XVII Siècle à Nos Jours. Beyrouth: Éditions des Oeuvres Politiques et Historiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoury, Philip S. 1987. Syria and the French Mandate: The Politics of Arab Nationalism, 1920–1945. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, Katharina. 2006. Heroic Faces, Disruptive Deeds: Remembering the Tribal Shaykh on the Syrian Euphrates. In Nomadic Societies in the Middle East and North Africa: Entering the 21st Century, ed. Dawn Chatty, 940–966. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longrigg, Stephen Hemsley. 1958. Syria and Lebanon Under French Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Timothy. 1988. Colonizing Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neep, Daniel. 2012. Occupying Syria Under the French Mandate: Insurgency, Space and State Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Northedge, Frederick Samuel. 1986. The League of Nations: Its Life and Times, 1920–1946. Leicester: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Alan. 1992. The Decline and Fall of the Ottoman Empire. London: John Murray Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, David. 1990. Making Algeria French: Colonialism in Bône, 1870–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, Norman. 1991. Why the Crimean War? A Cautionary Tale. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salibi, Kamal. 2005. A House of Many Mansions: The History of Lebanon Reconsidered. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šedivý, Miroslav. 2010. Metternich and the Syrian Question: 1840–1841. Austrian History Yearbook 41: 88–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, Sir Adolphus. 1867. Turkey and the Crimean War, a Narrative of Historical Events. London: Smith, Elder & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strangford, Viscount. 1869. A Selection from the Writings of Viscount Strangford on Political, Geographical, and Social Subjects, Vol. 1, ed. Viscountess Strangford. London: Richard Bentley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troubetzkoy, Alexis S. 1986. The Road to Balaklava: Stumbling into War with Russia. Toronto: Trafalgar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck, Edward A. 1881. Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire Since the Year 1150. Washington: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Delatolla, A. (2021). Preventing Autonomy: European Interests and the Application of a Standard of Civilization. In: Civilization and the Making of the State in Lebanon and Syria. Middle East Today. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57690-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics