Skip to main content

Innovation Management and Digitization: Will Everything Remain Different?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creating Innovation Spaces

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

The article describes the developmental stages of innovation management and the new implications caused by digitization. In order to delimit and position companies in the innovation ecosystem, an approach to determine meaningful company boundaries is presented. The fundamentally ambidextrous corporate structure requires methods, processes and measures with which the paradox between exploration and exploitation can be resolved and controlled. In this regard, corporate culture and communication play a decisive role for the transition towards ambidextrous innovation management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acatech (2013) Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0: Abschlussbericht des Arbeitskreises Industrie 4.0. Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Acatech (2015) Umsetzugsstrategie Industrie 4.0: Ergebnisbericht der Plattform Industrie 4.0, April 2015. Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden-Fuller C, Volberda HW (1997) Strategic renewal in large complex organizations: a competence based view. In: Heene A, Sanchez R (eds) Competence-based strategic management. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 89–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2003) Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Acad Manage Rev 28:238–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout AJ, Hartmann D, van der Duin P, Ortt R (2006) Innovating the innovation process. Int J Technol Manage 34(3/4):390–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler AD Jr (1962) Strategy and structure, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough HW (2006) Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni R (1994) Hypercompetition: managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Duwe J (2016) Kommunikation als Mikrofundierung dynamischer Fähigkeiten im Innovationsmanagement ambidextrer Technologieunternehmen. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichter K (2015) Grundlagen des Innovationsmanagements. Oldenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd SW, Lane PJ (2000) Strategizing throughout the organization: managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad Manage Rev 25:154–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, Inc (2017) Gartner says 8.4 billion connected “things” will be in use in 2017, up 31 percent from 2016. Pressemitteilung vom 7.2.2017. Online available at http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3598917. Accessed 27 May 2020

  • Geissbauer R, Schrauf S, Koch V, Kuge S (2014) Industrie 4.0? Chancen und Herausforderungen der vierten industriellen Revolution. PriceWaterhouseCoopers Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft. München

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad Manag J 47:209–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleich R, Schwarz M, Munck JC, Deyle N (2015) Industrie 4.0—zwischen Evolution und Revolution—Potenziale, neue Geschäftsmodelle und Auswirkungen auf das Controlling der Zukunft. In: Horváth P, Michel U (eds) Controlling im digitalen Zeitalter. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart, pp 101–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves A (1987) Comparative trends in automotive research and development, DRC Discussion Paper No. 54, Science Policy Research Unit. Sussex University, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelsblatt (2017) Siemens will kein Konglomerat mehr sein. Pressemitteilung vom 9.11.2017. Online available at http://www.handelsblatt.com/my/unternehmen/industrie/konzernumbau-siemens-will-kein-konglomerat-mehr-sein-/20561756.html?ticket=ST-2160913-b9iNcZvYb3AeiIjbKBNb-ap3. Accessed 27 May 2020

  • Heinze R, Manzei C, Schleuper L (2016) Industrie 4.0 im internationalen Kontext. Kernkonzepte, Ergebnisse, Trends. Beuth; VDE Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JJP (2005) Ambidextrous organizations: a multi-level study of absorptive capacity, explorative and exploitative innovation and performance. Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones GR, Hill CWL (1988) Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strateg Manage J 9:159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton DA (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strateg Manage J 13:111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strateg Manage J 14(S2):95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mast C (2009) Mitarbeiterkommunikation, Change und Innovationskultur: Balance von Informationen und Innovationen. In: Zerfass A, Möslein KM (eds) Kommunikation als Erfolgsfaktor im Innovationsmanagement. Wiesbaden, Gabler, pp 271–288

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mattmüller R (2012) Integrativ-prozessuales marketing. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough E, Leifer R (1983) Using simultaneous structures to cope with uncertainty. Acad Manag J 26:727–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensch G, Kaash K, Kleinknecht A, Schnapps R (1980) Innovation trends and switching between full- and under-employment equilibrium, 1950–1978. Discussion Paper Series, International Institute of Management, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestle V (2011) Open innovation im cluster. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oestereich, B. (2012): GPM-Blog. Online unter http://gpm-blog.de/bduf/. Accessed 1 Jan 2018

  • Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strateg Mange J 14:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano G (2015) You need an innovation strategy. Harv Bus Rev 93(6):44–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Provenmodels (2020) Online available at https://www.provenmodels.com/575/five-generations-of-innovation/roy-r.-rothwell/. Accessed 27 May 2020

  • Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disc industry. Strateg Manage J 22:287–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell R (1994) Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. Inter Market Rev 11(1):7–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (2004) Organizational Culture and Leadership. Third Edition. Josey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg G (1978) Umwelt, Technologie und Organisationsstruktur. Bern, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1931) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung: Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. Duncker & Humblot, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18:509–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd J, Bessant J, Pavitt K (2005) Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change, 3rd edn. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin Sci Q 31:439–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA (1996) Evolution and revolution: mastering the dynamics of innovation and change. Calif Manage Rev 38:8–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberda HW (1998) Building the flexible firm: how to remain competitive. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberda HW, Lewin AY (2003) Co-evolutionary dynamics within evolution to co-evolution. J Manage Stud 40:2111–2136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widmaier U (2000) Der deutsche Maschinenbau in den neunziger Jahren. Kontinuität und Wandel einer Branche. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1996) The mechanisms of governance, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfass A, Sandhu S, Huck S (2004) Innovationskommunikation: Strategisches Handlungsfeld für Corporate Communications. In: Piwinger M, Schönborn G, Bentele, G (Hrsg.) Kommunikationsmanagement (Lose Blattsammlung Bd. 1.24). Luchterhand, Neuwied, p 1–30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker Nestle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nestle, V. (2021). Innovation Management and Digitization: Will Everything Remain Different?. In: Nestle, V., Glauner, P., Plugmann, P. (eds) Creating Innovation Spaces. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57642-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics