Skip to main content
  • 467 Accesses

Abstract

The Introduction explains that this book was written in response to the lack of change in economics following the 2008 financial crisis. It is a response to the absence of imagination of a noncapitalist economy and lack of interest in the rich diversity of economic thought of 250 years of history of economics and what these ideas can bring for reflecting on a postcapitalist economy. The book hopes to inspire economists and noneconomists alike to reflect on feasible economic ideas and practices for a more stable and sustainable economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Critiques of this paradigm emerged as early as 1899 with Thorstein Veblen’s Theory of the Leisure Class, criticizing the hedonistic assumption of economic rationality as a lightning calculator of pleasure and pains: Thorstein Veblen, Theory of the Leisure Class. An Economic Study of Institutions, edited by B.W. Huebsch (New York: Viking, 1931 [1899]). Since then, numerous nonorthodox economists have followed suit, and the criticisms have multiplied since the 2008 financial crisis. This time with wide support from outside academia, including The Economist. But also from students, for example with a manifesto: Joe Earle, Cahal Moran and Zach Ward Perkins, The Econocracy – the Perils of Leaving Economics to the Experts (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016). Chapter 11 of this book will discuss criticism as well as the state of the debate in economics.

  2. 2.

    Marion Fourcade, Etienne Ollion and Yann Algan, “The Superiority of Economists,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29, 1 (2015): 89–114.

  3. 3.

    See, for example, four recent critiques of the dominant economic paradigm’s theory and practice: Ha-Joon Chang, Economics: The User’s Guide (London: Penguin, 2014); Steven Payson, How Economics Professors Can Stop Failing Us (Lanham: Lexington, 2017); Mariana Mazzucato, The Value of Everything, Making and Taking in the Global Economy (London: Penguin, 2018); David Colander and Craig Freedman, Where Economics Went Wrong: Chicago’s Abandonment of Classical Liberalism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018).

  4. 4.

    For an insightful reflection on this, see David Colander, Michael Goldberg, Armin Haas, Katarina Juselius, Alan Kurman, Thomas Lux, and Brigitte Sloth. “The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of the Economics Profession,” Critical Review – A Journal of Politics and Society 21, 2–3 (2009): 249–267.

  5. 5.

    Examples of such apologies for capitalism: Deirdre McCloskey, Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006); Giacomo Corneo, Is Capitalism Obsolete? A Journey through Alternative Economic Systems (Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2017); Joseph Stiglitz, People, Power, and Profits. Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent (New York: W.W. Norton, 2019).

  6. 6.

    Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation (New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1944). I was so impressed by this view that I did my PhD research on the topic, tracing the three economic domains back to Adam Smith and Albert Hirschman, who each in their own way confirmed Polanyi’s view that a well-functioning economy consists of three value domains: freedom in markets, justice in the state and care in the community economy. Irene van Staveren, The Values of Economics – an Aristotelian Perspective (London: Routledge, 2001). A recent analysis of market fundamentalism based on the work of Polanyi can be found here: Fred Block and Margaret Summers, The Power of Market Fundamentalism. Karl Polanyi’s Critique (Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2016).

  7. 7.

    Kate Raworth, Donut Economics. Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist (New York: Random House, 2017).

  8. 8.

    Donella Meadows, Dennis Meadows, and Jørgen Randers William W. Behrens III, The Limits to Growth (Washington D.C.: Potomac Associates, 1972); UNDP, Humanity Divided. Confronting Inequality in Developing Countries (New York: United Nations Development Program, 2013); Thomas Piketty, Capital in the 21st Century (Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2014); Tim Jackson, Prosperity without Growth – Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow (London: Routledge, 2017).

  9. 9.

    Pamela Abbott, Claire Wallace, and Roger Sapsford, The Decent Society – Planning for Social Quality (London: Routledge, 2016); IPSP, Rethinking Society for the 21st Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).

  10. 10.

    William Thomson, “The Young Person’s Guide to Writing Economic Theory,” Journal of Economic Literature 37, 1 (1999): 157–183.

  11. 11.

    Rethinking Economics is an international student movement active in 15 countries: http://www.rethinkeconomics.org/. Accessed on July 15, 2020.

  12. 12.

    These networks include Promoting Economic Pluralism: https://economicpluralism.org/. Accessed on July 15, 2020. Economics for Inclusive Prosperity: https://econfip.org/. Accessed on July 15, 2020. Next to these new initiatives, there is a wide variety of long-standing heterodox economics associations, from social economics to feminist economics and from institutional economics to interdisciplinary themes, for example the capability approach and the self-management of commons by communities.

  13. 13.

    The short biographies in each chapter are compiled from various sources, including: Harry Landreth and David Colander, History of Economic Thought, 4th edition (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2001). Steven Pressman, Fifty Major Economists, 3rd edition (London: Routledge, 2013).

  14. 14.

    Irene van Staveren, Economics after the Crisis – a Global and Pluralist Perspective (London: Routledge, 2015).

  15. 15.

    This book is a translation and revision of Irene van Staveren, Wat wij kunnen leren van economen die (bijna) niemand meer leest (Amsterdam: Boom, 2016).

Bibliography

  • Abbott, Pamela, Claire Wallace, and Roger Sapsford. The Decent Society – Planning for Social Quality. London: Routledge, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Block, Fred, and Margaret Summers. The Power of Market Fundamentalism. Karl Polanyi’s Critique. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Ha-Joon. Economics: The User’s Guide. London: Penguin, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colander, David, and Craig Freedman. Where Economics Went Wrong: Chicago’s Abandonment of Classical Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colander, David, Michael Goldberg, Armin Haas, Katarina Juselius, Alan Kurman, Thomas Lux, and Brigitte Sloth. “The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of the Economics Profession.” Critical Review – A Journal of Politics and Society 21, 2–3 (2009): 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colander, David, and Harry Landreth. History of Economic Thought, 4th edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corneo, Giacomo. Is Capitalism Obsolete? A Journey through Alternative Economic Systems. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Earle, Joe, Cahal Moran, and Zach Ward Perkins. The Econocracy – the Perils of Leaving Economics to the Experts. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fourcade, Marion, Etienne Ollion, and Yann Algan. “The Superiority of Economists.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29, 1 (2015): 89–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPSP. Rethinking Society for the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Tim. Prosperity without Growth – Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow. London: Routledge, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, Mariana. The Value of Everything, Making and Taking in the Global Economy. London: Penguin, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Deirdre. Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, Donella, Dennis Meadows, and Jørgen Randers William W. Behrens III. The Limits to Growth. Washington D.C.: Potomac Associates, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payson, Steven. How Economics Professors Can Stop Failing Us. Lanham: Lexington, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, Thomas. Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, Steven. Fifty Major Economists, 3rd edition. London: Routledge, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raworth, Kate. Donut Economics. Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. New York: Random House, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staveren, Irene van. The Values of Economics – an Aristotelian Perspective. London: Routledge, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— Economics after the Crisis – a Global and Pluralist Perspective. London: Routledge, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— Wat wij kunnen leren van economen die (bijna) niemand meer leest. Amsterdam: Boom, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph. People, Power, and Profits. Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent. New York: W.W. Norton, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, William. “The Young Person’s Guide to Writing Economic Theory.” Journal of Economic Literature 37, 1 (1999): 157–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. Humanity Divided. Confronting Inequality in Developing Countries. New York: United Nations Development Program, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of the Leisure Class. An Economic Study of Institutions, edited by B.W. Huebsch. New York: Viking, 1931 [1899].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene van Staveren .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van Staveren, I. (2021). Introduction. In: Alternative Ideas from 10 (Almost) Forgotten Economists . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57609-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57609-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57608-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57609-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics