Skip to main content

A Pathology of Public Sector IT Governance: How IT Governance Configuration Counteracts Ambidexterity

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 12219)

Abstract

Public sector organizations are invariable stuck in a contortionist position in regards to how they approach digitalization. Centralized delivery models for IT drive efficiency in the short term, but at the same time they have been identified to potentially counter-act innovation. This study utilizes an interpretative case study of 21 Swedish public agencies and their centralized IT function to analyze how existing IT governance configuration impacts organizational ambidexterity. The empirical base consists of 31 interviews and studies of secondary material in the form of steering documents. The findings show that IT Governance is experienced as decreasing the level of innovation in the organization and hence negatively impacting ambidexterity by systematically skewing the balance between efficiency and innovation. These findings are discussed in relation to previous research, and propositions for future research for better understanding IT governance configuration in the context of ambidexterity are presented and discussed.

Keywords

  • Ambidexterity
  • IT governance
  • Public sector

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_3
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-57599-1
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.

References

  1. Canguilhem, G.: The Normal and the Pathological. Zone Books, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Lyytinen, K.: Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 724–735 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Gregory, R.W., Keil, M., Muntermann, J., Mähring, M.: Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Inf. Syst. Res. 26(1), 57 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Magnusson, J., Koutsikouri, D., Pärivärinta, T.: Efficiency creep and shadow innovation: ambidextrous IT governance in the public sector. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. (2020, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wiener, M., Mähring, M., Remus, U., Saunders, C.S.: Control configuration and control enactment in information systems projects: review and expanded theoretical framework. MIS Q. 40(3), 741–774 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Magnusson, J., Bygstad, B.: Why I act differently: studying patterns of legitimation among CIOs through motive talk. Inf. Technol. People 26(3), 265–282 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Magnusson, J., Nilsson, A., Kizito, M.: Enacting digital ambidexterity: the case of the swedish public sector. In: AMCIS Conference Proceedings, Cancun, Mexico (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gregory, R.W., Kaganer, E., Henfridsson, O., Ruch, T.J.: IT consumerization and the transformation of IT governance. MIS Q. 42(4), 1225–1253 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. March, J.G.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1), 71–87 (1991)

    MathSciNet  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Benner, M.J., Tushman, M.L.: Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Manag. Rev. 28(2), 238–256 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Luger, J., Raisch, S., Schimmer, M.: Dynamic balancing of exploration and exploitation: the contingent benefits of ambidexterity. Organ. Sci. 29(3), 449–470 (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J.: Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Manag. 34(3), 375–409 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S., Cardinal, L.B.: Managing persistent tensions on the frontline: a configurational perspective on ambidexterity. J. Manage. Stud. 55(5), 739–769 (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., Greenwood, R.: Digital innovation and transformation: an institutional perspective. Inf. Organ. 28(1), 52–61 (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Mergel, I., Gong, Y., Bertot, J.: Agile government: systematic literature review and future research. Gov. Inf. Q. 35(4), 291–298 (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Weill, P., Ross, J.: A matrixed approach to designing IT governance. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 46(2), 26 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W.: An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business/IT alignment. Inf. Syst. Manag. 26(2), 123–137 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, S.P.J., Straub, D.W., Liang, T.P.: How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance: insights from a matched survey of business and IT managers. MIS Q. 39(2), 497–518 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., Bertin, E.: From sovereign IT governance to liberal IT governmentality? A Foucauldian analogy. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 27(3), 326–346 (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  20. Schlosser, F., Beimborn, D., Weitzel, T., Wagner, H.T.: Achieving social alignment between business and IT–an empirical evaluation of the efficacy of IT governance mechanisms. J. Inf. Technol. 30(2), 119–135 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Tonelli, A.O., de Souza Bermejo, P.H., Dos Santos, P.A., Zuppo, L., Zambalde, A.L.: IT governance in the public sector: a conceptual model. Inf. Syst. Front. 19(3), 593–610 (2017)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Xue, L., Ray, G., Sambamurthy, V.: Efficiency or innovation: how do industry environments moderate the effects of firms IT asset portfolio? MIS Q. 36(2) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Piccinini, E., Hanelt, A., Gregory, R., Kolbe, L.: Transforming industrial business: the impact of digital transformation on automotive organizations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for Information Systems, Fort Worth, Texas, US (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4(2), 74–81 (1995)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. www.lansstyrelsen.se. Accessed Mar 2020

  26. Silverman, D.: Interpreting Qualitative Data. SAGE Publications Limited, London (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532–550 (1989)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Mithas, S., Rust, R.T.: How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance: conjecture and empirical evidence. MIS Q. 40(1) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Myers, N., Starliper, M.W., Summers, S.L., Wood, D.A.: The impact of shadow IT systems on perceived information credibility and managerial decision making. Acc. Horiz. 31(3), 105–123 (2017)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  30. Cokins, G.: The top seven trends in management accounting. EDPACS 53(4), 1 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  31. Rolland, K.H., Mathiassen, L., Rai, A.: Managing digital platforms in user organizations: the interactions between digital options and digital debt. Inf. Syst. Res. 29(2), 419–443 (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. Banker, R.D., Hu, N., Pavlou, P.A., Luftman, J.: CIO reporting structure, strategic positioning, and firm performance. MIS Q. 35, 487–504 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., King, J.L.: Routines as shock absorbers during organizational transformation: Integration, control, and NASA’s enterprise information system. Organ. Sci. 27(3), 551–572 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. Yeow, A., Soh, C., Hansen, R.: Aligning with new digital strategy: a dynamic capabilities approach. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 27(1), 43–58 (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  35. Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E.: Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 50(1), 25–32 (2007)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. www.digg.se. Accesses Mar 2020

  37. Bannister, F.: The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons. Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 73(2), 171 (2007)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan Magnusson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Magnusson, J., Khisro, J., Melin, U. (2020). A Pathology of Public Sector IT Governance: How IT Governance Configuration Counteracts Ambidexterity. In: , et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12219. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57598-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57599-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)