Skip to main content

Aligning Stakeholder Interests, Governance Requirements and Blockchain Design in Business and Government Information Sharing

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 12219)

Abstract

Governance requirements for systems supporting information sharing between businesses and government organisations (B&G) are determined by a high variety of stakeholders with often conflicting interests. These conflicting interests can hamper the introduction and scaling-up of ICT-innovations that change their roles and authorities. We address one such innovation: the introduction of blockchain technologies in the B&G context. Who can govern data and the system depends on several elements of the design of a blockchain-based system, particularly the data structure, consensus mechanism and network topology. Design choices regarding these elements affect who can make decisions and hence we call them blockchain control points. These control points require an explicit and well-understood relationship between the design decisions and the interests of stakeholders. Yet, the literature on blockchain technology and governance does not offer such insight. Therefore, we developed a framework to assess the alignment between stakeholders interest and blockchain design choices. This framework consists of three views and their interrelationships, 1) a stakeholder view providing insight into the tensions between stakeholder’s interests and governance requirements, 2), a governance view on the rights concerning the data and the system, and 3) a blockchain control view describing how design decisions on the control points affect whether governance requirements are met and how parties can exercise their rights. Making these links explicit enables an understanding of how technical design choices can trigger organizational dynamics from the stakeholder view and vice versa. Based on the framework we formulate a research agenda concerning blockchain design choices and governance.

Keywords

  • Blockchain technology
  • Distributed ledger technology
  • Governance
  • Business
  • Government
  • Information sharing
  • Access control
  • Consensus mechanism

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_15
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-57599-1
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.profile-project.eu/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.tradelens.com/.

References

  1. Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., Janssen, M.: Blockchain in government: benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Gov. Inf. Q. 34, 355–364 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Korpela, K., Hallikas, J., Dahlberg, T.: Digital supply chain transformation toward blockchain integration. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4182–4191 (2017). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.506

  3. van Engelenburg, S.: Designing context-aware architectures for business-to-government information sharing (2019). https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:d25fd4fd-02d7-4811-b675-615badbb3c05

  4. Segers, L., Ubacht, J., Rukanova, B., Tan, Y.H.: The use of a blockchain-based smart import declaration to reduce the need for manual cross-validation by customs authorities. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 196–203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3325112.3325264

  5. Tian, F.: An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology. In: 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), pp. 1–6 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2016.7538424

  6. Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V., Whang, S.: Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Manag. Sci. 43, 546–558 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.4.546

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bray, R.L., Mendelson, H.: Information transmission and the bullwhip effect: an empirical investigation. Manag. Sci. 58, 860–875 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1467

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Hesketh, D.: Weaknesses in the supply chain: who packed the box. World Cust. J. 4, 3–20 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Fawcett, S.E., Osterhaus, P., Magnan, G.M., Brau, J.C., McCarter, M.W.: Information sharing and supply chain performance: the role of connectivity and willingness. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 12, 358–368 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540710776935

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, H.L., Whang, S.: Information sharing in a supply chain. Int. J. Manuf. Technol. 1, 79–93 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMTM.2000.001329

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Hart, P., Saunders, C.: Power and trust: critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organ. Sci. 8, 23–42 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.1.23

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakamoto, S.: bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Janssen, M., van der Voort, H.: Adaptive governance: towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Gov. Inf. Q. 33, 1–5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.003

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Mergel, I., Gong, Y., Bertot, J.: Agile government: systematic literature review and future research. Gov. Inf. Q. 35, 291–298 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.003

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Bevir, M.: What is governance? In: Key Concepts in Governance, pp. 2–11. SAGE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Eaton, B., Herzhoff, J., Sorensen, C.: Mobile platforms as convergent systems – analysing control points and tussles with emergent socio-technical discourses. In: Maícas, J.P. (ed.) Recent Developments in Mobile Communications: A Multidisciplinary Approach, pp. 97–112 (2011). Books on Demand

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rukanova, B., de Reuver, M., Henningsson, S., Nikayin, F., Tan, Y.H.: Emergence of collective digital innovations through the process of control point driven network reconfiguration and reframing: the case of mobile payment. Electron. Mark. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00352-z

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan, Y.-H., Rukanova, B., Engelenburg, S. van, Ubacht, J., Janssen, M.: Developing large scale B2B blockchain architectures for global trade lane. In: 6th Innovation in Information Infrastructures (III) Workshop, University of Surrey (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eckartz, S.M., Hofman, W.J., Van Veenstra, A.F.: A decision model for data sharing. In: Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., Wimmer, M.A., Bannister, F. (eds.) EGOV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8653, pp. 253–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_21

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  20. Constantinides, P.: Perspectives and implications for the development of information infrastructures. IGI Global (2012). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1622-6

  21. Ostrom, E.: How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. J. Theor. Polit. 15, 239–270 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803015003002

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Lamport, L., Shostak, R., Pease, M.: The byzantine generals problem. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 4, 382–401 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1145/357172.357176

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Klievink, B., et al.: Enhancing visibility in international supply chains: the data pipeline concept. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. 8, 14–33 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2012100102

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Rukanova, B., Henningsson, S., Henriksen, H.Z., Tan, Y.-H.: Digital trade infrastructures: a framework for analysis. Complex Syst. Inform. Model. Q., 1–21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2018-14.01

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by the PROFILE Project (nr. 786748), which is funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program. Ideas and opinions expressed by the authors do not necessarily represent those of all partners.

The authors would like to also thank Norbert Kouwenhoven for his contribution to demonstrating the framework in the TradeLens examples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sélinde van Engelenburg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

van Engelenburg, S., Rukanova, B., Hofman, W., Ubacht, J., Tan, YH., Janssen, M. (2020). Aligning Stakeholder Interests, Governance Requirements and Blockchain Design in Business and Government Information Sharing. In: , et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12219. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57598-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57599-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)