Abstract
Digital examination has always been the “gold standard” method to evaluate the foetal head descent, cervical ripening and dilatation and foetal head position before and during labour [1] and has led to the development of comprehensive partograms used on most delivery units [2].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Friedman E. Primigravid labour and labour in multiparous: a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1955;6:567–89.
Studd J. Partograms and nomograms of cervical dilatation in management of primigravid labour. BMJ. 1973;4:451–5.
Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides K. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:437–40.
Tutschek B, Braun T, Chantraine F, Henrich W. A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent. BJOG. 2011;118(1):62–9.
Maticot-Baptista D, Ramanah R, Collin A, Martin A, Maillet R, Riethmuller D. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal head engagement. A preliminary French prospective study. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2009;38(6):474–80.
Barbera A, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte D, Hobbins J. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(3):313–9.
Torkildsen E, Salvesen K, Eggebø T. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(6):702–8.
Ludmir J, Shedev H. Anatomy and physiology of the uterine cervix. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000;43(3):433–9.
Tufnell D, Bryce F, Johnson N, Lilford R. Simulation of cervical changes in labour: reproducibility of expert assessment. Lancet. 1989;2:1089–90.
Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth: a synopsis. Birth. 1995; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.1995.tb00567.x.
NICE. Intrapartum care; care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2007.
Robson, S. Variation of cervical dilatation estimation by midwives, doctors, student midwives and medical students in 1985—a small study using cervical simulation models. Research and the Midwife Conference Proceedings; University of Manchester 1991.
Buckmann E, Libhaber E. Accuracy of cervical assessment in the active phase of labour. BJOG. 2007;114:833–7.
RCOG. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: Assessment of progress in labour. elearning.rcog.org.uk. Accessed 09/01 2019.
Nystedt A, Hildingsson I. Diverse definitions of prolonged labour and its consequences with sometimes subsequent inappropriate treatment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:233.
Ying Lai C, Levy V. Hong Kong Chinese women’s experiences of vaginal examinations in labour. Midwifery. 2002;18:296–303.
Westover T, Knuppel R. Modern management of clinical chorioamnionitis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1995;3:123–32.
Nizard J, Haberman S, Paltieli Y, Gonen R, Ohel G, Nicholson D, Ville Y. How reliable is the determination of cervical dilation? Comparison of vaginal examination with spatial position-tracking ruler. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(4):402–4.
Zimerman A, Smolin A, Maymon R, Weinraub Z, Herman A, Tobvin Y. Intrapartum measurement of cervical dilatation using translabial 3-dimensional ultrasonography: correlation with digital examination and interobserver and intraobserver agreement assessment. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(10):1289–96.
Hassan W, Eggebø T, Ferguson M, Lees C. Simple two-dimentional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartum cervical dilatation: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:413–8.
Lenore, G. "Ultrasound Physics" A Chapter in the Westmead TOE Manual. In Anonymous Pre-Conference Workshop: Bats, Better Anaesthesia through Sonography, 2006.
Benediktsdottir S, Eggebø T, Salvesen K. Agreement between transperineal ultrasound measurements and digital examinations of cervical dilatation during labor. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:273. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0704-z.
Yuce T, Kalafat E, Koc A. Transperineal ultrasonography for labor management: accuracy and reliability. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12649.
Wiafe Y, Whitehead B, Venables H, Nakfa E. The effectiveness of intrapartum ultrasonography in assessing cervical dilatation, head station and position: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound. 2014;24(4):222–32.
Hassan W, Eggebø T, Ferguson M, Gillet A, Studd J, Pasupathy D, Lees C. The Sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:189–94.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor, S., Hassan, W.A. (2021). Cervical Dilatation by Transperineal or Translabial Ultrasound. In: Malvasi, A. (eds) Intrapartum Ultrasonography for Labor Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57595-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57595-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57594-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57595-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)