Skip to main content

Cervical Dilatation by Transperineal or Translabial Ultrasound

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intrapartum Ultrasonography for Labor Management
  • 715 Accesses

Abstract

Digital examination has always been the “gold standard” method to evaluate the foetal head descent, cervical ripening and dilatation and foetal head position before and during labour [1] and has led to the development of comprehensive partograms used on most delivery units [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedman E. Primigravid labour and labour in multiparous: a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1955;6:567–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Studd J. Partograms and nomograms of cervical dilatation in management of primigravid labour. BMJ. 1973;4:451–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides K. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:437–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tutschek B, Braun T, Chantraine F, Henrich W. A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent. BJOG. 2011;118(1):62–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maticot-Baptista D, Ramanah R, Collin A, Martin A, Maillet R, Riethmuller D. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal head engagement. A preliminary French prospective study. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2009;38(6):474–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barbera A, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte D, Hobbins J. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(3):313–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Torkildsen E, Salvesen K, Eggebø T. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(6):702–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ludmir J, Shedev H. Anatomy and physiology of the uterine cervix. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000;43(3):433–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tufnell D, Bryce F, Johnson N, Lilford R. Simulation of cervical changes in labour: reproducibility of expert assessment. Lancet. 1989;2:1089–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth: a synopsis. Birth. 1995; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.1995.tb00567.x.

  11. NICE. Intrapartum care; care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robson, S. Variation of cervical dilatation estimation by midwives, doctors, student midwives and medical students in 1985—a small study using cervical simulation models. Research and the Midwife Conference Proceedings; University of Manchester 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buckmann E, Libhaber E. Accuracy of cervical assessment in the active phase of labour. BJOG. 2007;114:833–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. RCOG. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: Assessment of progress in labour. elearning.rcog.org.uk. Accessed 09/01 2019.

  15. Nystedt A, Hildingsson I. Diverse definitions of prolonged labour and its consequences with sometimes subsequent inappropriate treatment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ying Lai C, Levy V. Hong Kong Chinese women’s experiences of vaginal examinations in labour. Midwifery. 2002;18:296–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Westover T, Knuppel R. Modern management of clinical chorioamnionitis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1995;3:123–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nizard J, Haberman S, Paltieli Y, Gonen R, Ohel G, Nicholson D, Ville Y. How reliable is the determination of cervical dilation? Comparison of vaginal examination with spatial position-tracking ruler. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(4):402–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zimerman A, Smolin A, Maymon R, Weinraub Z, Herman A, Tobvin Y. Intrapartum measurement of cervical dilatation using translabial 3-dimensional ultrasonography: correlation with digital examination and interobserver and intraobserver agreement assessment. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(10):1289–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hassan W, Eggebø T, Ferguson M, Lees C. Simple two-dimentional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartum cervical dilatation: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:413–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lenore, G. "Ultrasound Physics" A Chapter in the Westmead TOE Manual. In Anonymous Pre-Conference Workshop: Bats, Better Anaesthesia through Sonography, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Benediktsdottir S, Eggebø T, Salvesen K. Agreement between transperineal ultrasound measurements and digital examinations of cervical dilatation during labor. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:273. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0704-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuce T, Kalafat E, Koc A. Transperineal ultrasonography for labor management: accuracy and reliability. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12649.

  24. Wiafe Y, Whitehead B, Venables H, Nakfa E. The effectiveness of intrapartum ultrasonography in assessing cervical dilatation, head station and position: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound. 2014;24(4):222–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hassan W, Eggebø T, Ferguson M, Gillet A, Studd J, Pasupathy D, Lees C. The Sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:189–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Taylor, S., Hassan, W.A. (2021). Cervical Dilatation by Transperineal or Translabial Ultrasound. In: Malvasi, A. (eds) Intrapartum Ultrasonography for Labor Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57595-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57595-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57594-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57595-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics