Skip to main content

Asynclitism: Clinical and Intrapartum Diagnosis in Labor

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intrapartum Ultrasonography for Labor Management

Abstract

Even if in as seen in many delivery a moderate degrees of asynclitism is present very often, asynclitism is a clinical condition that may create mechanical dystocia during both the first and second stage of labor. Its recognition is of paramount importance to help the clinician in the management of labor and in his/her decision of route of delivery, vaginal, either spontaneous or operative, or cesarean.

Diagnosis of asynclitism by vaginal digital examination is very inaccurate and erroneous. The use of ultrasound in labor provides an objective information that will improve both maternal and fetal outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nizard J, Haberman S, Paltieli Y, Gonen R, Ohel G, Le Bourthe Y, Ville Y. Determination of fetal head station and position during labor: a new technique that combines ultrasound and a position-tracking system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:404.e1-5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elsevier. Mosby’s medical dictionary. 10th ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2017. p. 1722.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Operative vaginal delivery. Compendium of selected publications, ACOG. Practice Bulletin #17, June 2000. Washington, DC, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smith WT. The mechanism of labor. In: A manual of obstetrics: theoretical and practical. Chapt XXII. London: Savill and Edwards, Printers, Chandon Street; 1858. p. 265–89.

    Google Scholar 

  5. www.theodora.com/anatomy/the_parietal_bone.html. 5a. 2. The Parietal Bone. Figure 132 – Left parietal bone. Outer surface.

  6. O’Grady JP. Forceps operation. In: Modern instrument delivery. Chapt 3. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1988. p. 83–154.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M, Redarce T, et al. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:868–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barbera AF, Imani F, Necker T, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC. Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal engagement and station during labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:320–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchs I, Tutschek B, Henrich W. Visualization of the fetal fontanels and skull by three-dimensional translabial ultrasound during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:484–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Stark M. Intrapartum sonography sign for occiput posterior asynclitism diagnosis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(3):553–4. Epub 2010 Jul 14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blasi I, D'Amico R, Fenu V, Volpe A, Fuchs I, Henrich W, Mazza V. Sonographic assessment of fetal spine and head position during the first and second stages of labor for the diagnosis of persistent occiput posterior position: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:210–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Brizzi A, Guido M, Laterza F, De Nunzio G, Bochicchio M, Ghi T, Stark M, Benhamou D, Di Renzo G. Intrapartum sonography head transverse and asynclitic diagnosis with and without epidural analgesia initiated early during the first stage of labor. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011;15:518–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghi T, Youssef A, Pilu G, Malvasi A, Ragusa A. Intrapartum sonographic imaging of fetal head asynclitism. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:238–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Akmal S, Tsoi E, Kametas N, Howard R, Nicolaides KH. Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12:172–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides KH. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:437–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O. Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:258–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Souka AP, Haritos T, Basayiannis K, Noikokyri N, Antsaklis A. Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003;13:59–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chou MR, Kreizer D, Taslimi MM, Druzin ML, El Sayed Y. Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal head position occiput position during the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;19:521–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zahalka N, Sadan O, Malinger G, Liberati M, Boaz M, Glezerman M, et al. Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:381–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dupuis O, Ruimark S, Corinne D, Simone T, Andre’ D, Rene’-Charles R. Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;123:193–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sherer DM. Intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:123–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Malvasi A, Stark M, Ghi T, Farine D, Guido M, Tinelli A. Intrapartum sonography for fetal head asynclitism and transverse position: sonographic signs and comparison of diagnostic performance between transvaginal and digital examination. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(5):508–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghi T, Dall’Asta A, Kiener A, Volpe N, Suprani A, Frusca T. Intrapartum diagnosis of posterior asynclitism using two-dimensional transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:803–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Barbera A, Hobbins JC. Applicazioni di semeiotica ecografica in travaglio di parto. In: Gruppo di studio SIGO, Tecnologie informatiche e biofisiche in Ostetricia e Ginecologia. Trattato di Ecografia in Ostericia e Ginecologia. Prima edizione: Poletto Editore; 1997. p. 389–94.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:313–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:331–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bultez T, Quibel T, Bouhanna P, Popowski T, Resche-Rigon M, Rozenberg P. Angle of fetal head progression measured using transperineal ultrasound as a predictive factor of vacuum extraction failure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:86–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghi T, Bellussi F, Pilu G. Sonographic diagnosis of lateral asynclitism: a new subtype of fetal head malposition as a main determinant of early labor arrest. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:229–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC III, Hauth JC, Wenstrom KD. Mechanisms of normal labor. In: Williams obstetrics. 21nd ed edn. Section III, Chapt 12.: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 291–307.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Eggebø TM, , Iversen JK, Kahrs BH, Jacobsen AF, Torkildsen E. Moulding of the fetal head diagnosed with ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54 (Suppl. 1): 1–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wants to express his gratitude to Helen Macfarlane for the extensive and superb work in the production of the graphic representations. Further thank you to Elizabeth Figa for her contribution in structuring Table 17.1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barbera, A.F., Tinelli, A., Malvasi, A. (2021). Asynclitism: Clinical and Intrapartum Diagnosis in Labor. In: Malvasi, A. (eds) Intrapartum Ultrasonography for Labor Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57595-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57595-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57594-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57595-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics