Skip to main content

The Role of Intrapartum Sonography in Persistent Occiput Posterior Position and Prolonged Labor

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intrapartum Ultrasonography for Labor Management

Abstract

Persistent occiput posterior in prolonged second stage of labor represents an important clinical challenge. Fetuses in occiput posterior position are associated with increases in perinatal complications such as cesarean delivery, failure of operative vaginal delivery, neonatal acidemia, and neonatal intensive care admission. The use of intrapartum ultrasound to asses fetal position and to predict and aid in decision-making regarding successful spontaneous vaginal or operative vaginal deliveries can aid in safe management decisions. Ultrasound can also be used for assistance in both manual rotation and also in guidance prior to forces rotation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Intrapartum care for health healthy women and babies. In: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2014; https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190. Accessed 1 Aug 2019.

  2. Gimovsky AC. Abnormal second stage of labor. In: Berghella V, Saccone G, Ghi T, Roman A, editors. Evidence based labor and delivery management: Jaypee Brothers Medical Pub; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Operative vaginal delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 17. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;17(2):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown SJ, Gartland D, Donath S, MacArthurc C. Effects of prolonged second stage, method of birth, timing of caesarean section and other obstetric risk factors on postnatal urinary incontinence: an Australian nulliparous cohort study. BJOG. 2011;118(8):991–1000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):1181–93. [Internet].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gimovsky AC, Guarente J, Berghella V. Prolonged second stage in nulliparous with epidurals: a systematic review. J Matern Neonatal Med. [Internet]. 2016:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wing DA, Farineli CK. Abnormal labor and induction of labor. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, Landon MB, Galan HL, Juanonaux ERM, Driscoll DA, editors. Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2012. p. 271–88.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barth WH Jr. Persistent occiput posterior. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(3):695–709. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gardberg M, Laakonen E, Sälevaara M. Intrapartum sonography and persistent occiput posterior position: a study of 408 deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:746–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lieberman E, Davidson K, Lee-Paritz A, Shearer E. Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:974–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peregrine E, O’Brien P, Jauniaux E. Impact on delivery out- come of ultrasonographic fetal head position prior to induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:618–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akmal S, Tsoi E, Howard R, Osei E, Nicholaides KH. Investigation of occiput posterior delivery by ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:425–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ponkey SE, Cohen AP, Heffner LJ, Lieberman E. Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:915–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fitzpatrick M, McQuillan K, O’Herlihy C. Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:1027–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng Y, Shaffer B, Caughey A. The second stage of labor and persistent occiput posterior position: patience or intervention? In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine; Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 208(1):S152.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Altman MR, Lydon-Rochelle MT. Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. Birth. 2006;33(4):315–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Laughon SK, Berghella V, Reddy UM, Sundaram R, Lu Z, Hoffman MK. Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(1):57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Senécal J, Xiong X, Fraser WD, Pushing Early Or Pushing Late with Epidural Study Group. Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(4):763–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gimovsky AC, Berghella V. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):361.e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides KH. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:437–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley S, Langer O. Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:258–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Barbera A, Eggebø TM, Mynbaev OA, Bochicchio M, Pacella E, Di Renzo GC. Occiput posterior position diagnosis: vaginal examination or intrapartum sonography? A clinical review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;7(5):520–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.825598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghi T, Eggebø T, Lees C, Kalache K, Rozenberg P, Youssef A, Salomon LJ, Tutschek B. ISUOG practice guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):128–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sherer DM, Abulafia O. Intrapartum assessment of fetal head engagement: comparison between transvaginal digital and transabdominal ultrasound determinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(5):430–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:331–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ghi T, Bellussi F, Eggebø T, Tondi F, Pacella G, Salsi G, Cariello L, Piastra A, Youssef A, Pilu G, Rizzo N. Sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor: how reliable is the transperineal approach? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(16):1985–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2014.974539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Masturzo B, De Ruvo D, Gaglioti P, Todros T. Ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor: does it reduce the operative delivery rate? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:1560–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kalache KD, Dückelmann AM, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Cichon G, Dudenhausen JW. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(3):326–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sainz J, Carlota Borrero A, Serrano R, Gutiérrez L, Fernández-Palacín A. Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(11):1151–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.851188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Youssef A, Maroni E, Cariello L, Bellussi F, Montaguti E, Salsi G, Morselli-Labate AM, Paccapelo A, Rizzo N, Pilu G, Ghi T. Fetal head-symphysis distance and mode of delivery in the second stage of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(10):1011–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gilboa Y, Kivilevitch Z, Spira M, Kedem A, Katorza E, Moran O, Achiron R. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(4):442–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12304.

  32. Eggebø TM, Hassan WA, Salvesen KÅ, Lindtjørn E, Lees CC. Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(2):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Youssef A, Ghi T, Pilu G. How to perform ultrasound in labor: assessment of fetal occiput position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:476–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Masturzo B, Farina A, Attamante L, et al. Sonographic evaluation of the fetal spine position and success rate of manual rotation of the fetus in occiput posterior position: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Ultrasound. 2017;45:472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Malvasi A, Stark M, Ghi T, Farine D, Guido M, Tinelli A. Intrapartum sonography for fetal head asynclitism and transverse position: sonographic signs and comparison of diagnostic performance between transvaginal and digital examination. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(5):508–12. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2011.648234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Malvasi A, Barbera A, Di Vagno G, Gimovsky A, Berghella V, Ghi T, Di Renzo GC, Tinelli A. Asynclitism: a literature review of an often forgotten clinical condition. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(16):1890–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2014.972925. Review

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Beck R, Malvasi A, Kuczkowski KM, Marinelli E, Zaami S. Intrapartum sonography of fetal head in second stage of labor with neuraxial analgesia: a literature review and possible medicolegal aftermath. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(8):3159–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ghi T, Maroni E, Youssef A, Morselli-Labate AM, Paccapelo A, Montaguti E, Rizzo N, Pilu G. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(1):82–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gimovsky, A.C. (2021). The Role of Intrapartum Sonography in Persistent Occiput Posterior Position and Prolonged Labor. In: Malvasi, A. (eds) Intrapartum Ultrasonography for Labor Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57595-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57595-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57594-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57595-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics