Tools for the Co-designing of Housing Transformations: A Study on Interaction and Visualization Modes
- 80 Downloads
In this paper we present and assess tools for visualizing architectonic modifications of existing housing in co-design projects with inhabitants. These tools should enable inhabitants to explore and understand design variations of alterations of their houses. This contribution is part of ongoing research on the use of artificial realities for supporting the transformations of existing housing in architectonically responsible ways. Such transformations may be needed after the delivery of housing, say after five years or later, due to changed regulation, the need of updates or changed living conditions of inhabitants. For arriving at architectonically responsible transformations, we use shape grammar system for defining possible modifications of the housing. For empowering inhabitants to understand and explore these modifications to their housing, we develop a transformation grammar tool—MyChanges—to visualize the modifications by three visualization modes, from fully immersive to non-immersive. Interviews and tests with real inhabitants were performed, and preliminary conclusions show that a tool like the MyChanges would have a good acceptance among inhabitants.
KeywordsParticipatory design Generative design tool Virtual reality Users’ feedback
This project was partially funded by grant EEA Grants FBR_OC1_020 – ISCTE “Artificial Realities: Virtual as an aesthetic medium in architectural ideation.” Also, we had support from projects FCT UID/Multi/04466/2019 and UIDB/04466/2020. Micaela Raposo has a Ph.D. research grant by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia through grant SFRH/BD/146044/2019.
- 1.Coelho, A. B. (2010). Habitação Humanizada. Lisboa: Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil.Google Scholar
- 2.Gehl, J. (2010) Cities for people. Island Press.Google Scholar
- 3.Zaera-Polo, A., & Koolhaas, R. (1992). Rem Koolhaas/OMA, 1987–1992. El Croquis, no53.Google Scholar
- 4.Mota, N. (2017). A progressive attachment (pp. 89–107). Consuming architecture: On the occupation, appropriation and interpretation of buildings.Google Scholar
- 5.Mota, N. (2014b). Design ed Self‐help. Producing closed forms for open buildings (pp. 1–13). ETH Zürich.Google Scholar
- 6.Rodrigues, A. L. (2015). A experiência da Quinta da Malagueira (1977): Ensinamentos e cautelas na concretização de habitação de custos-controlados, para uma arquitetura avisada. In 3o CIHEL - congresso Internacional de Habitação no Espaço Lusófono. São Paulo (Brasil), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
- 7.Mota, N. (2014a). A progressive attachment: Accommodating growth and change in Álvaro Siza’s Malagueira neighhood. In D. Maudlin, & M. Vellinga (Eds.) Consuming Architecture. On the occupation, appropriation and interpretation of buildings (pp. 89–107). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 8.Eloy, S. (2012). A transformation grammar-based methodology for housing rehabilitation. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.Google Scholar
- 9.Eloy, S., Dias, M. Â., & Vermaas, P. E. (2018). User-centered shape grammars for housing transformations: Towards post-handover grammars. In Proceedings of Sigradi 2018 Technopoliticas. São Paulo (Brasil): IAU USP.Google Scholar
- 10.Habraken, N. J. (1972). Supports: An alternative to mass housing. London (UK): The Architectural Press.Google Scholar
- 11.Goethert, R. (2010). Incremental housing: A proactive urban strategy. Monday Developments, (September), pp. 23–25.Google Scholar
- 12.Aravena, A., & Iacobelli, A. (2016). Elemental: Incremental housing and participatory design manual. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag.Google Scholar
- 13.MVRDV and Axis.fm. (2012). Architecture in mind. The HouseMaker. In MVRDV and The Why Factory (Eds.), The Vertical Village. Individual, Informal, Intense. NAi Publishers, pp 169–194.Google Scholar
- 14.Corullon, M. (2016). Apresentação. Arquitetura em Diálogo—Alejandro Zaera-Polo (pp. 7–12). UBU: São Paulo.Google Scholar
- 15.De Koning, J. I. J. C., Crul, M. R. M., & Renee, W. (2016). Models of co-creation. Service Design, 2016, 266–278.Google Scholar
- 16.Faliu, B., et al. (2018). Design and Prototyping of an Interactive Virtual Environment to Foster Citizen Participation and Creativity in Urban Design. In 27th International Conference on Information Systems Developmen, (Sweden), pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22993-1_4.
- 18.Stiny, G., & Gips, J. (1972). Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and sculpture. In O. Petrocelli (Ed.), The best computer papers of 1971. New Jersey: Auerbach.Google Scholar
- 19.Correia, R. C., Duarte, J. P., & Leitão, A. M. (2010). MALAG: A discursive grammar interpreter for the online generation of mass customized housing. In Proceedings of the Workshop in 4th Conference Design Computing and Cognition.Google Scholar
- 20.Duarte, J. P. (2005). A discursive grammar for customizing mass housing: The case of Siza’s houses at Malagueira’, Automation in Construction, 14(2 SPEC. ISS.), pp. 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2004.07.013.
- 24.Milgram, P., et al. (1994). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Systems Research, 2351 (Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies), pp. 282–292. http://doi.org/10.1.1.83.6861.
- 25.Tori, R., & Kirner, C. (2006). Fundamentos da Realidade Aumentada (pp. 22–38). Fundamentos e Tecnologia de Realidade Virtual e Aumentada. In R. Tori, C. Kirner, & R. Siscouto, p. 422.Google Scholar