Abstract
Measuring the performativity of office space has been a long-standing topic of research. With the emergence of knowledge economy, the nature of work has changes considerably, foregrounding personal interaction and information interchange. Consequently, traditional tools of space evaluation, such as space syntax, have become increasingly difficult to apply. This research, therefore, uses a methodology based on agent-based simulation, focusing on agent behavior rather than on space morphology to assess the social performance of spaces. The research process is conducted in two phases: In a first research phase, simple social models are developed for the agent population in order to set up simulations that show differentiated agent behavior toward other agents and architectural frame dependency. A series of simplified yet plausible life-like office event scenarios with strategic changes to the furniture layout is used to evaluate and calibrate the simulation’s social performance. Based on these simulations and the social algorithms derived from them, in a second research phase an experimental setup that follows the generative logics of evolutionary design solving is devised to identify office layouts with the highest social performativity. Methodically searching the design space for performance peaks, algorithmic design is used to generate, simulate, and test an initially large number of random scenarios against a set of predefined success criteria in order to obtain a subset of the most successful configurations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Saval, N. (2014). Cubed—A secret history of the workplace. New York: Anchor Books.
Kockelkorn, A. (2008). Bürolandschaft—Eine vergessene Reformstrategie der deutschen Nachkriegsmoderne. ARCH + Zeitschrift für Architektur und Städtebau, 186/187, 6–7.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (2003). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peponis, J., Bafna, S., et al. (2007). Designing space to support knowledge work. Environment and Behaviour, 39, 815–840.
Bafna, S. (2003). Space syntax a brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environment and Behaviour, 35, 17–29.
Steen, J., & Markhede, H. (2010). Spatial and social configurations in offices. The Journal of Space Syntax, 1(1), 121–132.
Groves, K., & Marlow, O. (2016). Interview with Kerstin Sailer. Spaces for innovation—The design and science of inspiring environments (pp. 61–64). Amsterdam: Frame Publishers.
Gilbert, N. (2008). Agent-based models. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Reynolds, C. (1987). Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed behavioral model. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques ACM, 21(4), 25–34.
Abar, S., Theodoropoulos, G., Lemarinier, P., & O’Hare, G. (2017). Agent based modeling and simulation tools: A review of the state-of-art software. Computer Science Review, 24, 13–33.
Wilensky, U., & Rand, W. (2015). An introduction to agent-based modeling: Modeling natural, social, and engineered complex systems with NetLogo (p. xiv). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Schumacher, P. (2019). Digital. AA Files, 76, 47–52 (AA Publications, The Architectural Association, London).
Schumacher, P. (2016). Advanced social functionality via agent-based parametric semiology. In P. Schumacher (Ed.), Parametricism 2.0. AD 02/2016 (p. 112). Wiley: London.
Fagiolo, G., Windrum, P., & Moneta, A. (2006). Empirical validation of agent-based models: A critical survey (No. 2006/14). Pisa: Sant’ Anna School of Advanced Studies, Laboratory of Economics and Management.
Simon, H. A. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice. In H. A. Simon (Ed.), Models of man. New York: Wiley.
Eurostat. (2013). Science, technology and innovation in Europe. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
Greene, C., & Myerson, J. (2011). Space for thought: Designing for knowledge workers. Facilities, 29(1/2), 19–30.
Neumayr, R. (2020). Simulating contemporaray office occupation pattern with simplified social models. Atlanta: Divergence in Architectural Research, GeorgiaTech University.
Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink. London: Penguin Books.
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138.
De Landa, M. (2002). Deleuze and the use of the genetic algorithm in architecture. Architectural Design, 72, 9–12.
Dennet, C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Acknowledgements
This project is part of a broader research program, generously founded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) PEEK—project AR 354-G24. My appreciations go to Patrik Schumacher and to my fellow researchers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Neumayr, R.R. (2021). Agent-Based Semiology: Optimizing Office Occupation Patterns with Agent-Based Simulations. In: Eloy, S., Leite Viana, D., Morais, F., Vieira Vaz, J. (eds) Formal Methods in Architecture. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57509-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57509-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57508-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57509-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)