Skip to main content

What About if Buildings Respond to My Mood?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Formal Methods in Architecture

Abstract

This work analyzes the possibilities of interaction between the built environment and its users, focused on the responsiveness of the first to the emotions of the latter. Transforming the built environment according to the mood, feelings, and emotions of users, moment by moment, is discussed and analyzed. The main goal of this research is to define a responsive model by which the built environment can respond in a personalized way to the users’ emotions. For such, computational technical issues, building construction elements and users’ interaction are identified and analyzed. Case studies where occurs an interaction between the physical space and users are presented. We define a model for an architecture that is responsive to the user’s emotions assuming the individual at one end and the space at the other. The interaction between both ends takes place according to intermediate steps: the collection of data, the recognition of emotion, and the execution of the action that responds to the detected emotion. As this work focuses on an innovative and disruptive aspect of the built environment, the recognition of the new difficulties and related ethical issues are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See http://archigram.westminster.ac.uk/project.php?id=109.

  2. 2.

    See http://archigram.westminster.ac.uk/project.php?id=109.

References

  1. Bălan, O., et al. (2019). ‘Fear level classification based on emotional dimensions and machine learning techniques’. Sensors. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 19(7), 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19071738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beesley, P., Hirosue, S., & Ruxton, J. (2006). Toward responsive architectures. In Responsive architectures: Subtle technologies. Riverside Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bullivant, L. (2006). Responsive environments : Architecture, art and design, V & A contemporary series.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Decker, M. (2013). Emergent futures: Nanotechology and emergent materials in architecture. In Conference: Tectonics of Teaching—Building Technology Educators Society (BTES) (February).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eastman, C. (1972). Adaptive-conditional architecture. In Design participation, proceedings of the design research society’s conference Manchester (pp. 51–57). London: Academy Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99(3), 550–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elfenbein, H. A., Marsh, A. A., & Ambady, W. I. N. (1997). Emotional intelligence and the recognition of emotion from facial expressions. In L. F. Barrett & P. Salovey (Eds.), Emotions and social behavior. The wisdom in feeling: Psychological processes in emotional intelligence (pp. 37–59). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fox, M., & Kemp, M. (2008). Interactive Architecture. In Interactive architecture.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Franz, G., Von Der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). An empirical approach to the experience of architectural space in virtual reality-exploring relations between features and affective appraisals of rectangular indoor spaces. Automation in Construction, 14(2 SPEC. ISS.), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2004.07.009.

  10. Frazer, J. (1995). An evolutionary architecture. London: Architectural Association. Available at: https://opasquet.fr/dl/texts/Frazer_An_Evolutionary_Architecture_1995.pdf.

  11. Frijda, N. H. (1994). Varieties of affect: Emotions and episodes, moods, and sentiments. The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gendron, M., & Barrett, L. F. (2009). Reconstructing the past: A century of ideas about emotion in psychology. Emotion Review, 1(4), 316–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073909338877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Glynn, R. (2005). Fun palace—Cédric price. Available at: http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/fun-palace-cedric-price.html.

  14. Gordon, K. (1906). Esthetics. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grobman, J. Y., & Shemesh, A. (2015). Space and human perception—Exploring our reaction to different geometries of spaces. In 20th International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia CAADRIA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Henriques, G. C. (2015). Sistemas responsivos: relevância, estado da arte e desenvolvimentos (pp. 200–206). https://doi.org/10.5151/despro-sigradi2015-60042.

  17. Khalili, Z., & Moradi, M. H. (2009). Emotion recognition system using brain and peripheral signals: Using correlation dimension to improve the results of EEG. In 2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (pp. 1571–1575). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ijcnn.2009.5178854.

  18. Kievid, C., & Oosterhuis, K. (2003). Muscle NSA, a basis for a true paradigm shift in architecture. Available at: http://www.hyperbody.nl/research/projects/muscle-nsa/index.html.

  19. Kolarevic, B., & Parlac, V. (2015). Adaptive, responsive building skins. In Building dynamics: Exploring architecture of change. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315763279.

  20. Leite, S., et al. (2019). Physiological arousal quantifying perception of safe and unsafe virtual environments by older and younger adults. Sensors, 19(2447), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, C., et al. (2018). Multi-feature based emotion recognition for video clips. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction (ICMI’18) (pp. 630–634). New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maier, F. (2012). One ocean—Thematic pavilion for EXPO 2012. Available at: https://www.detail-online.com/article/one-ocean-thematic-pavilion-for-expo-2012-16339/.

  23. Mathews, S. (2005). The fun palace: Cedric price’s experiment in architecture and technology. Technoetic Arts, 3(2), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1386/tear.3.2.73/1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Meagher, M. (2015). Designing for change: The poetic potential of responsive architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research. Elsevier, 4(2), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2015.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ménard, M., et al. (2015) Emotion recognition based on heart rate and skin conductance. https://doi.org/10.5220/0005241100260032.

  26. Mulligan, K., & Scherer, K. R. (2012). Toward a working definition of emotion. Emotion Review, 4(4), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912445818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Negroponte, N. (1970). The architectural machine: Towards a more human environment. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Office Ozelo. (2015). Cerebral hut. Available at: http://www.ozeloffice.com/new-page.

  29. Oosterhuis, K. (2003) Hyperbodies : Toward an E-motive architecture. Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pallasma, J. (2005). The eyes of the skin. Architecture and the senses. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Picard, R. W. (2000). Toward computers that recognize and respond to user emotion. IBM Systems Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Quesnel, D., & Riecke, B. E. (2018). Are you awed yet? How virtual reality gives us awe and goose bumps. Frontiers in Psychology, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02158.

  33. Rabeneck, A. (1969). Cybermation: A useful dream. Architectural Design, 497–500.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Samadiani, N., et al. (2020). A multiple feature fusion framework for video emotion recognition in the wild. Concurrency Computation Practice and Experience. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.5764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shu, L., et al. (2018). A review of emotion recognition using physiological signals. Sensors, 18(2074). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072074.

  36. Sterk, T. D. (2003). Building upon negroponte: A hybridized model of control suitable for responsive architecture. Automation in Construction, 14(2), 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun, J., et al. (1996). The influence of surface slope on human gait characteristics: A study of urban pedestrians walking on a inclined surface. Ergonomics, 39(4), 677–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. World’s “Smartest” House Created By CU-Boulder Team. (1998). Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/518742334033.pdf?expires=1580242037&id=id&accname=oid015503&checksum=AF990ADD908741CBBB25670E25137FB4.

  39. Zuk, W., & Clark, R. H. (1970). Kinetic architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication was partially funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia under project UIDB/04466/2020 and UIDP/04466/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Eloy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Almeida, L., Eloy, S., de Almeida, A. (2021). What About if Buildings Respond to My Mood?. In: Eloy, S., Leite Viana, D., Morais, F., Vieira Vaz, J. (eds) Formal Methods in Architecture. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57509-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics