Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Network and Storage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematical Optimization for Efficient and Robust Energy Networks

Part of the book series: AIRO Springer Series ((AIROSS,volume 4))

  • 350 Accesses

Abstract

We present a brief, informal overview of the physical reality of electric power systems, its mathematical models, and some of the associated optimization problems. Many references are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U. Aldasoro, L.F. Escudero, M. Merino, J.F. Monge, G. Perez, On parallelization of a stochastic dynamic programming algorithm for solving large-scale mixed 0-1 problems under uncertainty. TOP 23, 703–742 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. U. Aldasoro, L.F. Escudero, M. Merino, G. Perez, An algorithmic framework for solving large-scale multistage stochastic mixed 0-1 problems with nonsymmetric scenario trees. part ii: parallelization. Comput. Oper. Res. 40, 2950–2960 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. U. Aldasoro, L.F. Escudero, M. Merino, J.F. Monge, G. Perez, A parallel branch-and-fix coordination based matheuristic algorithm for solving large-scale multistage stochastic mixed 0-1 problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 258, 590–606 (2017)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Al-Khamis, R. M’Hallah, A two-stage stochastic programming model for the parallel machine scheduling problem with machine capacity. Comput. Oper. Res. 38(12), 1747–1759 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Alonso-Ayuso, L.F. Escudero, M.T. Ortuño, BFC, a branch-and-fix coordination algorithmic framework for solving stochastic 0-1 programs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 151, 503–519 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Aranburu, L.F. Escudero, M.A. Garin, G. Perez, A so-called cluster benders decomposition approach for solving two-stage stochastic linear programs. TOP 20, 279–295 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Asamov, W.B. Powell, Regularized decomposition of highdimensional multistage stochastic programs with markov uncertainty (2015). arXiv:1505.02227

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Baringo, A.J. Conejo, Transmission and wind power investment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27(2), 885–893 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Beaudin, H. Zareipour, A. Schellenberglabe, W. Rosehart, Energy storage for mitigating the variability of renewable electricity sources: an updated review. Energy Sustain. Dev. 14(4), 302–314 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Beltran-Royo, L.F. Escudero, J.F. Monge, R.E. Rodriguez-Ravines, An effective heuristic for multistage stochastic linear optimization. Comput. Oper. Res. 51, 237–250 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Ben-Haim, Info-Gap Decision Theory (Academic Press, Cambridge, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Beraldi, L. Grandinetti, R. Musmanno, C. Triki, Parallel algorithms to solve two-stage stochastic linear programs with robustness constraints. Parallel Comput. 26, 1889–1908 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Bernstein, L. Reyes-Chamorro, J.-Y. Le Boudec, M. Paolone, A composable method for real-time control of active distribution networks with explicit power setpoints. part I: Framework. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 125, 254–264 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Bernstein, E. Dall’Anese, A. Simonetto, Online primal-dual methods with measurement feedback for time-varying convex optimization. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 67(8), 1978–1991 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. F. Capitanescu, L. Wehenkel, An AC OPF-based heuristic algorithm for optimal transmission switching, in Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), 2014 (IEEE, Piscataway, 2014), pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  16. C.C. Carøe, R. Schultz, Dual decomposition in stochastic integer programming. Oper. Res. Lett. 24, 37–45 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Carpentier, Contribution a l’etude du dispatching economique. Bull. Soc. Fr. Elect. 3(1), 431–447 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Carpentier, Optimal power flows. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 1(1), 3–15 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Chen, W. Wu, B. Zhang, H. Sun, Robust restoration decision-making model for distribution networks based on information gap decision theory. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6(2), 587–597 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. W.Y. Chiu, H. Sun, H.V. Poor, A multiobjective approach to multimicrogrid system design. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6(5), 2263–2272 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Ci, N. Lin, D. Wu, Reconfigurable battery techniques and systems: a survey. IEEE Access 4, 1175–1189 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Coffrin, H.L. Hijazi, K Lehmann, P. Van Hentenryck, Primal and dual bounds for optimal transmission switching, in Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), 2014 (IEEE, Piscataway, 2014), pp. 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  23. Common solution on phase shift transformers on ceps-50hertz interconnector, in Czech-German High-Level Meeting on Unplanned Flows Prague (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. M.P. Cristobal, L.F. Escudero, J.F. Monge, On stochastic dynamic programming for solving large-scale planning problems under uncertainty. Comput. Oper. Res. 36(8), 2418–2428 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. E. Dall’Anese, S. Guggilam, A. Simonetto, Y.C. Chen, S.V. Dhople, Optimal regulation of virtual power plants. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33(2), 1868–1881 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. E. Dall’Anese, A. Simonetto, Optimal power flow pursuit. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 9(2), 942–952 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. G. Emiel, C. Sagastizabal, Incremental like bundle methods with applications to energy planning. Comput. Optim. Appl. 46, 305–332 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. L.F. Escudero, M.A. Garin, M. Merino, G. Perez, A general algorithm for solving two-stage stochastic mixed 0-1 first-stage problems. Comput. Oper. Res. 36, 2590–2600 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. L.F. Escudero, M. Araceli, M.A. Garin, G. Perez, A. Unzueta, Scenario cluster decomposition of the lagrangian dual in two-stage stochastic mixed 0-1 optimization. Comput. Oper. Res. 40(1), 362–377 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. L.F. Escudero, M.A. Garin, C. Pizarro, A. Unzueta, On the strongest lagrangean bounds for stochastic location-assignment problems, in 59 XXII EURO Working Group on Locational Analysis (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. L.F. Escudero, J.F. Monge, D.R. Morales, An SDP approach for multiperiod mixed 0-1 linear programming models with stochastic dominance constraints for risk management. Comput. Oper. Res. 58(Supplement C), 32–40 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. L.F. Escudero, M.A. Araceli Garin, M. Merino, G. Perez, On time stochastic dominance induced by mixed integer-linear recourse in multistage stochastic programs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 249(1), 164–176 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. L.F. Escudero, J.F. Monge, D.R. Morales, On the time-consistent stochastic dominance risk averse measure for tactical supply chain planning under uncertainty. Comput. Oper. Res. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. L.F. Escudero, M.A. Garin, C. Pizarro, A. Unzueta, On efficient matheuristic algorithms for multi-period stochastic facility location-assignment problems. Comput. Optim. Appl. 70(3), 865–888 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. P. Ferraro, E. Crisostomi, M. Raugi, F. Milano, Analysis of the impact of microgrid penetration on power system dynamics. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 32(5), 4101–4109 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. P. Ferraro, E. Crisostomi, M. Raugi, F. Milano, On the impact of microgrid energy management systems on power system dynamics, in IEEE PES General Meeting (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. E.B. Fisher, R.P. OŃeill, M.C. Ferris, Optimal transmission switching. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 23(3), 1346–1355 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. B. Ghaddar, J. Marecek, M. Mevissen, Optimal power flow as a polynomial optimization problem. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31(1), 539–546 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. H. Glavitsch, Switching as means of control in the power system. Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst. 7(2), 92–100 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. R. Gollmer, F. Neise, R. Schultz, Stochastic programs with first-order dominance constraints induced by mixed-integer linear recourse. SIAM J. Optim. 19(2), 552–571 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. R. Gollmer, U. Gotzes, R. Schultz, A note on second-order stochastic dominance constraints induced by mixed-integer linear recourse. Math. Program. 126(1), 179–190 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Grid energy storage. Technical report, Department of Energy (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  43. V. Guigues, SDDP for some interstage dependent risk-averse problems and application to hydro-thermal planning. Comput. Optim. Appl. 57(1), 167–203 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. A. Hauswirth, A. Zanardi, S. Bolognani, Florian Dörfler, G. Hug, Online optimization in closed loop on the power flow manifold, in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerTech conference, Manchester (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  45. K.W. Hedman, R.P. O’Neill, E.B. Fisher, S.S. Oren, Optimal transmission switching with contingency analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 24(3), 1577–1586 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. K.W. Hedman, M.C. Ferris, R.P O’Neill, E.B Fisher, S.S. Oren, Co-optimization of generation unit commitment and transmission switching with N-1 reliability. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25(2), 1052–1063 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  47. K.W. Hedman, S.S. Oren, R.P. O’Neill, Optimal transmission switching: economic efficiency and market implications. J. Regul. Eco. 40(2), 111–140 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. R. Hemmati, R. Hooshmand, A. Khodabakhshian, Comprehensive review of gen-eration and transmission expansion planning. IET Gen. Trans. Distrib. 7, 955–964 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. H. Ibrahim, A. Ilinca, J. Perron, Energy storage systems-characteristics and comparisons. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 12(5), 1221–1250 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. R.A. Jabr, Optimization of AC transmission system planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(3), 2779–2787 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. S.R. Khuntia, B.W. Tuinema, J.L. Rueda, M.A.M.M. van der Meijden, Time-horizons in the planning and operation of transmission networks: an overview. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 10(4), 841–848 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. B. Kocuk, S.S. Dey, X. Sun, New formulation and strong MISOCP relaxations for AC optimal transmission switching problem. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 32(6), 4161–4170 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. V. Kozmík, D.P. Morton, Evaluating policies in risk-averse multi-stage stochastic programming. Math. Program. 152(1), 275–300 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. X. Kuang, L.F. Zuluaga, B. Ghaddar, J. Naoum-Sawaya, Approximating the ACOPF problem with a hierarchy of socp problems, in 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (IEEE, Piscataway, 2015), pp. 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  55. G. Latorre, R.D. Cruz, J.M. Areiza, A. Villegas, Classification of publications and models on transmission expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 18, 938–946 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. J. Lavaei, S.H. Low, Zero duality gap in optimal power flow problem. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27(1), 92–107 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Z. Li, M.G. Ierapetritou, Capacity expansion planning through augmented lagrangian optimization and scenario decomposition. AIChE J. 58(3), 871–883 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. J. Linderoth, A. Shapiro, S. Wright, The empirical behavior of sampling methods for stochastic programming. Annal. Oper. Res. 142(1), 215–241 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. J.A. López, K. Ponnambalam, V.H. Quintana, Generation and transmission expansion under risk using stochastic programming. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22(3), 1369–1378 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. S. Lumbreras, A. Ramos, Optimal design of the electrical layout of an offshore wind farm applying decomposition strategies. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(2), 1434–1441 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. S. Lumbreras, A. Ramos, The new challenges to transmission expansion planning. Survey of recent practice and literature review. Elect. Power Syst. Res. 134, 19–29 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  62. W.-J. Ma, J. Marecek, M. Mevissen, A fine-grained variant of the hierarchy of lasserre, in 57th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing. Preprint. arXiv:1906.09586 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  63. R. Madani, A. Kalbat, J. Lavaei, Admm for sparse semidefinite programming with applications to optimal power flow problem, in 2015 IEEE 54th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE, Piscataway, 2015), pp. 5932–5939

    Google Scholar 

  64. D. Mahlke, A Scenario Tree-Based Decomposition for Solving Multistage Stochastic Programs: With Application in Energy Production (Springer, Berlin, 2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. J. Marecek, M. Mevissen, J.C. Villumsen, Minlp in transmission expansion planning, in 2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  66. A.A. Mazi, B.F. Wollenberg, M.H. Hesse, Corrective control of power system flows by line and bus-bar switching. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 1(3), 258–264 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. D.K. Molzahn, I.A. Hiskens, A survey of relaxations and approximations of the power flow equations. Found. Trends Elect. Energy Syst. 4(1–2), 1–221 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  68. J.M. Mulvey, A. Ruszczyński, A new scenario decomposition method for large-scale stochastic optimization. Oper. Res. 43(3), 477–490 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. M.P. Nowak, W. Römisch, Stochastic lagrangian relaxation applied to power scheduling in a hydro-thermal system under uncertainty. Annal. Oper. Res. 100(1), 251–272 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. W. Oliveira, C. Sagastizábal, S. Scheimberg, Inexact bundle methods for two-stage stochastic programming. SIAM J. Optim. 21(2), 517–544 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. F. Oliveira, V. Gupta, S. Hamacher, I.E. Grossmann, A lagrangean decomposition approach for oil supply chain investment planning under uncertainty with risk considerations. Comput. Chem. Eng. 50(Supplement C), 184–195 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  72. R.P. OŃeill, R. Baldick, U. Helman, M.H. Rothkopf, W. Stewart, Dispatchable transmission in RTO markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20(1), 171–179 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. R.P. O’Neill, A. Castillo, M.B. Cain, The computational testing of ac optimal power flow using the current voltage formulations. Fed. Energy Regul. Comm. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  74. A. Ortega, F. Milano, Generalized model of VSC-based energy storage systems for transient stability analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31(5), 3369–3380 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. A. Ortega, F. Milano, Modeling, simulation, and comparison of control techniques for energy storage systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 32(3), 2445–2454 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. A. Pagè-Bernaus, G. Pérez-Valdés, A. Tomasgard, A parallelised distributed implementation of a branch and fix coordination algorithm. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 244(1), 77–85 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. M. Pereira, L. Pinto, S. Cunha, G. Oliveira, A decomposition approach to automated generation/transmission expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst. 104(11), 3074–3083 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. M.V.F. Pereira, L.M.V.G. Pinto, Stochastic optimization of a multireservoir hydroelectric system: a decomposition approach. Water Resour. Res. 21(6), 779–792 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. M.V.F. Pereira, L.M.V.G. Pinto, Multi-stage stochastic optimization applied to energy planning. Math. Program. 52(1), 359–375 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. D. Pozo, E.E. Sauma, J. Contreras, A three-level static milp model for generation and transmission expansion planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(1), 202–210 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. A. Rabiee, A. Soroudi, A. Keane, Information gap decision theory based OPF with HVDC connected wind farms. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30, 3396–3406 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. J. Ratz, Unintended cross-border electricity flows in central eastern Europe and their regulatory implications, in 14th Baltic Electricity Market Mini-Forum (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  83. R.T. Rockafellar, R.J.-B. Wets, Scenarios and policy aggregation in optimization under uncertainty. Math. Oper. Res. 16(1), 119–147 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. J.H. Roh, M. Shahidehpour, Y. Fu, Market-based coordination of transmission and generation capacity planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22(4), 1406–1419 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. R. Romero, J.F. Franco, F.B. Leão, M.J. Rider, E.S. de Souza, A new mathematical model for the restoration problem in balanced radial distribution systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31(2), 1259–1268 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. A. Ruszczyński, Parallel decomposition of multistage stochastic programming problems. Math. Program. 58(1), 201–228 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  87. A. Ruszczyński, On convergence of an augmented lagrangian decomposition method for sparse convex optimization. Math. Oper. Res. 20(3), 634–656 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. A. Ruszczyński, A. Świȩtanowski, Accelerating the regularized decomposition method for two stage stochastic linear problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 101(2), 328–342 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  89. C. Sagastizábal, Divide to conquer: decomposition methods for energy optimization. Math. Program. 134(1), 187–222 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  90. M. Sahraei-Ardakani, A. Korad, K.W. Hedman, P. Lipka, S. Oren, Performance of AC and DC based transmission switching heuristics on a large-scale polish system, in 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting/Conference & Exposition (IEEE, Piscataway, 2014), pp. 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  91. M. Sahraei-Ardakani, K.W. Hedman, A fast LP approach for enhanced utilization of variable impedance based facts devices. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31(3), 2204–2213 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. B. Sandikçi, O.Y. Özaltin, A scalable bounding method for multistage stochastic programs. SIAM J. Optim. 27(3), 1772–1800 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  93. Y. Scholz, Renewable energy based electricity supply at low costs – development of the remix model and application for Europe. Ph.D. Thesis, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Technical Thermodynamics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  94. S. Sen, Z. Zhou, Multistage stochastic decomposition: a bridge between stochastic programming and approximate dynamic programming. SIAM J. Optim. 24(1), 127–153 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  95. M. Shahidehpour, Investing in expansion: the many issues that cloud electricity planning. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 2, 14–18 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. M. Shahidehpour, Global broadcast – transmission planning in restructured systems. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 5(5), 18–20 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. A. Shapiro, W. Tekaya, J. da Costa Paulo, M. Pereira Soares, Risk neutral and risk averse stochastic dual dynamic programming method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 224(2), 375–391 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  98. A. Simonetto, E. Dall’Anese, Prediction-correction algorithms for time-varying constrained optimization. IEEE Trans. Signal Proces. 65(20), 5481–5494 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  99. M. Tahanan, W. van Ackooij, A. Frangioni, F. Lacalandra, Large-scale unit commitment under uncertainty. 4OR 13(2), 115–171 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  100. Y. Tang, K. Dvijotham, S. Low, Real-time optimal power flow. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8(6), 2963–2973 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. J.A. Taylor, F.S Hover, Linear relaxations for transmission system planning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26(4), 2533–2538 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  102. W. Van Ackooij, J. Malick, Decomposition algorithm for large-scale two-stage unitcommitment. Annal. Oper. Res. 238, 587–613 (2016)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  103. W. Van Ackooij, C. Sagastizabal, Constrained bundle methods for upper inexact oracles with application to join chance constrained energy problems. SIAM J. Optim. 24, 733–765 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  104. R.M. Van Slyke, R. Wets, L-shaped linear programs with applications to optimal control and stochastic programming. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 17(4), 638–663 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  105. J.C. Villumsen, A.B. Philpott, Column generation for transmission switching of electricity networks with unit commitment. Lecture Notes Eng. Comput. Sci. 2189, 1440–1443 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  106. J.C. Villumsen, G. Bronmo, A.B. Philpott, Line capacity expansion and transmission switching in power systems with large-scale wind power. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(2), 731–739 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. J.P. Watson, D.L. Woodruff, Progressive hedging innovations for a class of stochastic mixed-integer resource allocation problems. Comput. Manag. Sci. 8(4), 355–370 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  108. G.L. Zenarosa, O.A. Prokopyev, A.J. Schaefer, Scenario-tree decomposition: Bounds for multistage stochastic mixed-integer programs. Technical report, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Pittsburgh (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  109. X. Zhou, E. Dall’Anese, L. Chen, A. Simonetto, An incentive-based online optimization framework for distribution grids. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 63(7) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  110. M. Zidar, P.S. Georgilakis, N.D. Hatziargyriou, T. Capuder, D. Škrlec, Review of energy storage allocation in power distribution networks: applications, methods and future research. IET Gen. Trans. Distrib. 10(3), 645–652 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. J. Zou, S. Ahmed, X.A. Sun, Stochastic dual dynamic integer programming (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

    J. Marecek

  2. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain

    F. L. Escudero

  3. ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    P. Gabrielli

  4. ARERA - Autorit di Regolazione per Energia Reti e Ambiente, Milan, Italy

    F. Lacalandra

  5. University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    A. Soroudi

  6. IBM Research Europe, Dublin, Ireland

    M. Mevissen

  7. Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, USA

    C. Josz

  8. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada

    B. Ghaddar

  9. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    A. Grothey & K. McKinnon

  10. University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    E. Crisostomi

  11. Imperial College London, London, UK

    P. Ferraro

Authors
  1. J. Marecek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. L. Escudero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Gabrielli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Lacalandra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Soroudi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Mevissen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. C. Josz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. B. Ghaddar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A. Grothey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. K. McKinnon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. E. Crisostomi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. P. Ferraro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Marecek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sciences and Methods for Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy

    Natalia Selini Hadjidimitriou

  2. Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    Antonio Frangioni

  3. Wissenschaftliche Information, Zuse Institut, Berlin, Germany

    Thorsten Koch

  4. Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada

    Andrea Lodi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marecek, J. et al. (2021). Network and Storage. In: Hadjidimitriou, N.S., Frangioni, A., Koch, T., Lodi, A. (eds) Mathematical Optimization for Efficient and Robust Energy Networks. AIRO Springer Series, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57442-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation