Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 55))

Abstract

Feature selection plays a central role in predictive analysis where datasets have hundreds or thousands of variables available. It can also reduce the overall training time and the computational costs of the classifiers used. However, feature selection methods can be computationally intensive or dependent of human expertise to analyze data. This study proposes a neuroevolutionary approach which uses multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to optimize neural network parameters in order to find the best network able to identify the most important variables of analyzed data. Classification is done through a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier where specific parameters are also optimized. The method is applied to datasets with different number of features and classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Available at https://archive.ics.uci.edu.

References

  1. Guyon I, Gunn S, Nikravesh M, Zadeh LA (2008) Feature extraction: foundations and applications, vol 207. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  2. Unler A, Murat A, Chinnam RB (2011) mr2PSO: a maximum relevance minimum redundancy feature selection method based on swarm intelligence for support vector machine classification. Inf Sci 181:4625–4641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hancer E, Xue B, Zhang M, Karaboga D, Akay B (2018) Pareto front feature selection based on artificial bee colony optimization. Inf Sci 422:462–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bi J (2003)Multi-objective programming in SVMs. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on machine learning (ICML-03)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Igel C (2005) Multi-objective model selection for support vector machines. In: International conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization

    Google Scholar 

  6. Oliveira LS, Morita M, Sabourin R (2006) Feature selection for ensembles using the multi-objective optimization approach. In: Multi-objective machine learning. Springer, pp 49–74

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gaspar-Cunha A (2010) Feature selection using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: application to cardiac SPECT diagnosis. In: Advances in bioinformatics. Springer, pp 85–92

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pinto R, Silva H, Duarte F, Nunes J, Gaspar-Cunha A (2019) Neuroevolutionary multiobjective methodology for the optimization of the injection blow molding process. In: International conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization

    Google Scholar 

  9. Denysiuk R, Duarte FM, Nunes JP, Gaspar-Cunha A (2017) Evolving neural networks to optimize material usage in blow molded containers. In: EUROGEN - international conference on evolutionary and deterministic methods for design optimization and control with applications to industrial and societal problems

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denysiuk R, Gaspar-Cunha A, Delbem ACB (2019) Neuroevolution for solving multiobjective knapsack problems. Expert Syst Appl 116:65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sokolova M, Lapalme G (2009) A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks. Inf Process Manag 45:427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beume N, Naujoks B, Emmerich M (2007) SMS-EMOA: multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume. Eur J Oper Res 181:1653–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zitzler E, Thiele L (1998) Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms—a comparative case study. In: International conference on parallel problem solving from nature

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia in the scope of the projects: PEst-OE/EEI/UI0319/2014, UID/MAT/00013/2013, UID/CEC/ 00319/2019 and the European project MSCA-RISE-2015, NEWEX, with reference 734205.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renê S. Pinto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pinto, R.S., Costa, M.F.P., Costa, L.A., Gaspar-Cunha, A. (2021). A Neuroevolutionary Approach to Feature Selection Using Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms. In: Gaspar-Cunha, A., Periaux, J., Giannakoglou, K.C., Gauger, N.R., Quagliarella, D., Greiner, D. (eds) Advances in Evolutionary and Deterministic Methods for Design, Optimization and Control in Engineering and Sciences. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 55. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57422-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57422-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57421-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57422-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics