Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 55))

Abstract

The use of robust design in aerodynamic shape optimization is increasing in popularity in order to come up with configurations less sensitive to operational conditions. However, the addition of uncertainties increases the computational cost as both design and stochastic spaces must be explored. The objective of this work is the development of an efficient framework for gradient-based robust design by using an adjoint formulation and a non-intrusive surrogate-based uncertainty quantification method. At each optimization iteration, the statistic of both the quantity of interest and its gradients are efficiently obtained through Gaussian Processes models. The framework is applied to the aerodynamic shape optimization of a 2D airfoil. With the presented approach it is possible to reduce both the mean and standard deviation of the drag compared to the deterministic optimum configuration. The robust solution is obtained at a reduced run time that is independent of the number of design parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Duvigneau R (2007) Aerodynamic shape optimization with uncertain operating conditions using metamodels. resreport RR-6143, INRIA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schulz V, Schillings C (2013) Optimal aerodynamic design under uncertainty. In: Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 297–338

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maruyama D, Liu D, Görtz S (2016) An efficient aerodynamic shape optimization framework for robust design of airfoils using surrogate models. In: Proceedings of the VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (ECCOMAS Congress 2016). NTUA, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar D, Raisee M, Lacor C (2018) Combination of polynomial chaos with adjoint formulations for optimization under uncertainties. In: Uncertainty management for robust industrial design in aeronautics. Springer International Publishing, pp 567–582

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shan S, Wang GG (2009) Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions. Struct Multi Optim 41:219–241

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Giles MB, Pierce NA (2000) An introduction to the adjoint approach to design. Flow, Turbul Combust 65:393–415

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maruyama D, Görtz S, Liu D (2018) General introduction to surrogate model-based approaches to UQ. In: Uncertainty management for robust industrial design in aeronautics. Springer International Publishing, pp 203–211

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hicks RM, Henne PA (1978) Wing design by numerical optimization. J Aircr 15:407–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerhold T (2015) Overview of the hybrid RANS code TAU. In: MEGAFLOW—numerical flow simulation for aircraft design. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 81–92

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sabater C, Görtz S (2019) An efficient bi-level surrogate approach for optimizing shock control bumps under uncertainty. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gerhold T, Neumann J (2006) The parallel mesh deformation of the DLR TAU-code. In: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design (NNFM). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 162–169

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brezillon J, Dwight RP (2011) Applications of a discrete viscous adjoint method for aerodynamic shape optimisation of 3d configurations. CEAS Aeronaut J 3:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dwight R (2006) Efficiency improvements of rans-based analysis and optimization using implicit and adjoint methods on unstructured grids. In: DLR Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. - Forschungsberichte

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reuther J, Jameson A, Farmer J, Martinelli L, Saunders D (1996) Aerodynamic shape optimization of complex aircraft configurations via an adjoint formulation. In: 34th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

    Google Scholar 

  15. Forrester AI, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Progress Aerosp Sci 45:50–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maruyama D, Liu D, Görtz S (2018) Surrogate model-based approaches to UQ and their range of applicability. In Uncertainty management for robust industrial design in aeronautics. Springer International Publishing, pp 703–714

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sobol I (1967) On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Comput Math Math Phys 7:86–112

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Han Z-H, Görtz S, Zimmermann R (2013) Improving variable-fidelity surrogate modeling via gradient-enhanced kriging and a generalized hybrid bridge function. Aerosp Sci Technol 25:177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dwight R, Han Z-H (2009) Efficient uncertainty quantification using gradient-enhanced kriging. In 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by the European Commission’s H2020 programme, through the UTOPIAE Marie Curie Innovative Training Network, H2020-MSCA-ITN-2016, Grant Agreement number 722734.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Sabater .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sabater, C., Görtz, S. (2021). Gradient-Based Aerodynamic Robust Optimization Using the Adjoint Method and Gaussian Processes. In: Gaspar-Cunha, A., Periaux, J., Giannakoglou, K.C., Gauger, N.R., Quagliarella, D., Greiner, D. (eds) Advances in Evolutionary and Deterministic Methods for Design, Optimization and Control in Engineering and Sciences. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 55. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57422-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57422-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57421-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57422-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics