Skip to main content

Why Not Replace Quantitative Risk Assessment Models with Regression Models?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantitative Risk Analysis of Air Pollution Health Effects

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 299))

  • 511 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 2 suggested that dynamic simulation models, Bayesian networks, and causal analysis can add value to statistical regression modeling for understanding causal exposure concentration-response (C-R) relationships well enough to predict how changes in exposure would affect health risks—a task that typically requires causal insights that regression modeling alone cannot deliver (Pearl 2009). Chapters 3, 4, 5, and 6 have discussed dynamic simulation models. This part of the book turns to Bayesian networks and causal analysis (Chaps. 9, 10, and 11). First, however, this chapter and Chap. 8 examine some ways in which regression has been misapplied in public health risk analysis, both to motivate the need for other methods and to explain why regression alone is not an adequate substitute for quantitative risk assessment (QRA), with its explicit emphasis on preventable causes of disease and the quantitative causal relationships between reductions in exposures and resulting reductions in health risks. Part 3 will apply these lessons specifically to air pollution and public health, with greatest emphasis on National Ambient Aie Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5). This chapter previews some of the issues developed in Part 3 by considering public health risks from a much more local form of air pollution: emissions from factory farms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Biggs D, de Ville B, Suen E. A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. J Appl Stat. 1991;18(1):49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodkin CA, Balmes JR, Redlich CA, Cullen MR. Residential proximity to naturally occurring asbestos: health risk or ecologic fallacy? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173(5):573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W-D. Testing for spurious regression in a panel data model with the individual number and time length growing. J Appl Stat. 2006;33(8):759–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christenfeld NJ, Sloan RP, Carroll D, Greenland S. Risk factors, confounding, and the illusion of statistical control. Psychosom Med. 2004;66(6):868–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox LA Jr. Some limitations of a proposed linear model for antimicrobial risk management. Risk Anal. 2005;25(6):1327–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Y, Zhang ZF, Froines J, Zhao J, Wang H, Yu SZ, Detels R. Air pollution and case fatality of SARS in the People’s Republic of China: an ecologic study. Environ Health. 2003;2(1):15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis B, Wong WH. Learning causal Bayesian Network structures from experimental data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2008;103(482):778–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fewell Z, Davey Smith G, Sterne JA. The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(6):646–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S. Ecologic versus individual-level sources of bias in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30(6):1343–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland S, Brumback B. An overview of relations among causal modeling methods. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(5):1030–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs RL, Leamer EE, Ward MP. Difficulties with testing for causation. Econ Inq. 1979;17(3):401–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok RK, Yankaskas BC. The use of census data for determining race and education as SES indicators: a validation study. Ann Epidemiol. 2001;11(3):171–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R. Econometric policy evaluation: a critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy. 1976;1:19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J. Causal inference in statistics: an overview. Stat Surveys. 2009;3:96–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvin S, Merrill D, Wong L, Sacks ST. Ecologic regression analysis and the study of the influence of air quality on mortality. Environ Health Perspect. 1984;54:333–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih J-S, Burtraw D, Palmer K, Siikamäki J (2006) Air emissions of ammonia and methane from livestock operations: valuation and policy options. Resources for the future. Discussion paper. Washington, D.C. http://www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-DP-06-11.pdf

  • Shipley B. Cause and correlation in biology. a user’s guide to path analysis, structural equations and causal inference. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneeringer S. Does animal feeding operation pollution hurt public health? A national longitudinal study of health externalities identified by geographic shifts in livestock production. Am J Agric Econ. 2009;91(1):124–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield J. Multi-level modelling, the ecologic fallacy, and hybrid study designs. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(2):330–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix: Data Sources

Appendix: Data Sources

Main data page

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/rankings.html

Violent crime per 100,000, 2004

http://www.census.gov/statab/ranks/rank21.html

Unemployment

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/ranks/rank25.html

Infant mortality 2003

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/ranks/rank17.xls

Infant mortality rates 2004, 2005

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/09s0111.xls

Divorce

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/09s0123.xls

Abortions

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/09s0099.xls

Income 2005

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/ranks/rank29.xls

% Black, Hispanic, White

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/ranks/rank05.xls

Poverty 2005

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/ranks/rank34.xls

Education 2005

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/ranks/rank19.xls

Livestock ($M)

http://www.ors2.state.sc.us/abstract/chapter1/staterank12.php

Pigs&Hogs 2005–2007 (number, production)

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/09s0829.xls

Cattle&Calves 2006–2008 (number, production)

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/09s0830.xls

Broilers&Turkeys 2005–2007 (production)

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/09s0835.xls

Farm acreage

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/09s0797.xls

Death rates

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/09s0108.xls

Causes of death

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/09s0116.xls

Manufacturing employment % 2005

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/ranks/rank26.xls

Violent crime 2005

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/ranks/rank21.xls

Teacher salaries 2004

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/ranks/rank20.xls

Marriage rates

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/09s0123.xls

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cox Jr., L.A. (2021). Why Not Replace Quantitative Risk Assessment Models with Regression Models?. In: Quantitative Risk Analysis of Air Pollution Health Effects. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 299. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57358-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics