Abstract
Current security systems are more and more complex, as they integrate a variety of technologies, these systems often require a long period of development. When we change the requirements, the goals are to improve the functionality, cost, or delay of the systems; but unfortunately, this change may be affected by an issue with other system security requirements.
This chapter helps to improve safety with the evaluation of human risk by applying a multi-criteria approach to help decision-making by analytical hierarchy process methods and the PROMETHE method.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ayadi, D., Azzabi, L., Kobi, A., Robledo, C., & Chabchoub, H. (2008). Classification of human risks with the method analytical hierarchy process. In Quality and dependability the 11th international conference, September.
Bernhard, K., Catharina, G., & Marc, F. (2007). State/event fault trees—A safety analysis model for software-controlled systems. International journal of Reliability Engineering and system safety, 92(11), 1521–1537.
Brans, J. P., Vincke, P. H., & Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24, 228–238.
Colson, G. (2000). The OR's prize winner and the software ARGOS: How a multijudge and multicriteria ranking GDSS helps a jury to attribute a scientific award. Computers & Operations Research, 27, 741–755.
Fadier, E., & Ciccotelli, J. (1999). How to integrate safety in design: Methods and models. Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics in manufacturing, 9(4), 367–380.
Fadier, E., Garza, C., & Didelot, A. (2003). Safe design and human activity: Construction of a theoretical framework from an analysis of a printing sector. Safety Science, 41, 759–789.
Goetsch, D. L. (1997). Implementing Total safety management. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Gregoriades, A., & Sutcliffe, A. (2008). Workload prediction for improved design and reliability of complex systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, 530–549.
Hale, A., Kirwan, B., & Kjellén, U. (2003). Safe by design: Where are we now. Safety Science, 45(2007), 305–327.
Health & Safety Executive. (1999). HSG48, reducing error and influencing behaviour. HSE Books.
Health and Safety Executive. (2006). Five steps to risk assessment. INDG163(rev2) 06/06.
Huacan, F., & Menglan, D. (2014). Safety System Engineering for Offshore Oil Offshore Operation Facilities Equipment and Procedures, Pages e183-e347.
Hughes, G., & Weichel, M. K. (2004). Whose fault is it anyway? A practical illustration of human factors in process safety. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 115, 127–132.
Huylenbroeck, G. V. (1995). “The conflict analysis method” bridging the gap between ELI CTRE, PROMETHEE and ORESTE. European Journal of Operational Research, 82, 490–502.
Ingram, S. (2003). Risk assessment. In Fact sheet- Umatilla chemical agent disposal facility. State of Oregon: Department of environmental Quality.
Larsen, R. F., & Buede, D. M. (2002). Theoretical framework the continuous early validation (CEAVA) method. Journal Systems Engineering, 5(3), 223–241.
Leena N, Paula S. (2004). Usability evaluation of complex system: a literature review. STUK-YTO-TR.
Marc, M.J. (1999). Multicriterion decision aid: methods and applications. In CORS-SCRO, Annual conference, Windsor, Ontario.
Neathey, F., Sinclair, A., Rick, J., Ballard William Hunt, J., & Denvir, A (2006). An evaluation of the five steps to risk assessment. In Institute for Employment Studies Mantell Building Falmer Brighton BN1 9RF, HSE BOOKS.
Neboit, M. (2003). A support to prevention integration since design phase: The concepts of limit conditions and limit activities tolerated by use. Safety Science, 41, 95–109.
Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijk, H. F. (2003). Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 531–548.
Osborn, A.F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving (3rd Revised ed.). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Papadopoulos, Y. Maruhn, M. (2001). Model-based automated synthesis of fault trees from Matlab-Simulink models. In DSN’01, Int’l Conf. on Dependable Systems and Networks (pp. 77–82). Götenborg.
Pate-Cornell, M. E. (1998). Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 54(2-3), 95–111.
Haimes, Y. Y. (1996). Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management. New York: Wiley.
Pierre, B. J., & Bertrant, M. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research, 44, 1–10.
Rasmussen, J. (1999). The concept of human error: Is it useful for the design of safe systems. Safety science monitor, special edition.
Roy, B. (2000). Multicriteria aid for decisions. A French–English decision aiding glossary. Newsletter of the European Working Group Series 3, vol. 1.
Saaty, T. L. (1989). Group decision making and the AHP in the analytic hierarchy process: Application and studies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Saaty, T. L. (2001). The analytic network process: Decision making with dependence and feedback. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. L. (2002). Fundamentals of decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications. edition, revised.
Saaty, T. L. (2007). Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP: Generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, 860–891.
Sylvain, D., Elie, F., Olivier, C., & Jean-Marc, P. (2003). Complexité des interactions entre un modèle de sécurité et un modèle d’organisation. Qualita, -Swaminathan.
Villemeur, A. (1992). Methods and techniques, reliability, availability, maintainability and safety assessment. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Azzabi, L., Azzabi, D., Kobi, A. (2020). The Multi-Criteria Approach Assessment Human Risks: Application the Analytical Hierarchy Process and PROMETHEE Methods. In: The Multi-Criteria Approach for Decision Support. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 300. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57262-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57262-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57261-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57262-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)