Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gandhi’s Calling Orientation: Applications to Organizational Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gandhi and the Psychology of Nonviolence, Volume 2

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the two characteristics necessary in every organization, big or small, namely, effectiveness and efficiency, to reveal how management experts and the discipline of organizational behavior can learn from Gandhi. Starting with motivation, it is revealed how Gandhi differed from behavioristic theorists of motivation and their narrow focus on reinforcements, advocating, instead, intrinsic motivation in the form of “listening to one’s heart” or “soul force,” a concept very similar to that of the “Calling Orientation,” on which psychology has only recently started focusing. Gandhi’s followers drew from such intrinsic forms of motivation, which brings in its wake, organizational citizenship, effectiveness and efficiency of the highest order. The second part of the chapter deals with the simple techniques through which Gandhi used the power of groups and group dynamics to manage efficiently and effectively, various satyagrahi organizations, again revealing that the psychological study of group dynamics can be highly enriched through the analysis of Gandhian techniques. We, move, thereafter, to the concept of leadership and detail the Gandhian model of leadership, namely, leadership by example, and delve into the advantages accrued thereby, going far beyond those obtained from the traditional trichotomy (autocratic/democratic/laissez-faire styles). It has been emphasized that Bandura’s social learning theory is, definitely, relevant; that charisma can be used for the betterment of the employees; and that group cohesiveness does not always have to be deleterious. The third part of the chapter deals with the Gandhian concept of trusteeship, much akin to the modern concept of servant leadership along with the various moral issues being faced today, for example, diversity management, corporate governance and transparency, corporate social responsibility, conflict management and the means-end relationship. Organizational psychology can, certainly, use the ideas put forth by Gandhi to resolve these issues amicably.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, N. J. (1991). International dimensions in organizational behavior. Boston: PWS-Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afsar, B., Umrani, W. A., & Khan, A. (2019, January 9). The impact of perceived calling on work outcomes in a nursing context: The role of career commitment and living one’s calling. Journal of Applied Behavioral Research, 24(1), e12154. https://doi.org/10.1111/jabr.12154. March 2019.

  • Antonakis, J., Fenley, M., & Liechti, S. (2012, June). Learning charisma. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from hbr.org.

  • Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations, 48(2), 97–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. New York, NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banwo, A., Du, J., & Onokala, U. (2015). The impact of cohesiveness on organizational performance: The Nigerian case. International Journal of Business and Management, 10, 146–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barling, J., & Cooper, C. L. (2008). The SAGE handbook of organizational behavior. Vol. 1: Micro approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, B. (2012, April, 25). Make Your Job More Meaningful. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from hbr.org.

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2002). Integrative and distributive negotiation in small group: Effects of task structure, decision rule and social motive. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereby-Meyer, Y., Moran, S., & Unger-Aviram, E. (2004). When performance goals deter performance: Transfer of skills in integrative negotiations. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 93, 142–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bligh, M. C., & Robinson, J. L. (2010). Was Gandhi “charismatic”? Exploring the rhetorical leadership of Mahatma Gandhi. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 844–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bono, G. (2005). Commonplace forgiveness: From healthy relationships to healthy society. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 29, 82–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (2004). Transformational leadership. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiocchio, F., & Essiembre, H. (2009). Cohesion and performance: A meta-analytic review of disparities between project teams, production teams, and service teams. Small Group Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409335103.

  • Cole, M. S., Bruch, H., & Vogel, B. (2012). Energy at work: A measurement validation and linkage to unit effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crede, M., et al. (2019). The generalizability of transformational leadership across cultures: A meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0506.

  • Dawson, B. L., Johnson, C. D., & Ferdman, B. M. (2014). Organizational psychology. In F. T. L. Leong (Ed.), APA handbook of multicultural psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and research. Washington, DC: The American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relation, 2, 129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (2005). Commentary on morality, decision making and collateral casualties. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 1(1), 63–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Difranza, A. (2019, March). Transformational leadership: How to inspire innovation in the workplace. Northwestern University. northwestern.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, R. D. & Dik, B. J. (2013). Research on calling: What have we learned and where are we going? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 428–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. (1969). Gandhi’s truth. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1969). A basis for comparative analysis of complex organizations. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), A sociological reader on complex organizations. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, P. (2019, November 12). Creating a diversity and inclusion training program. Business News Daily.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, M., Abdelaal, Y., Lakhani, S., Sachdeva, S., Tasmim, S., & Sharma, D. (2016). Why is Gandhi wise? A cross-cultural comparison of Gandhi as an exemplar of wisdom. Journal of Adult Development, 23(4), 204–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to say yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follett, M. (1940). Constructive conflict. In H. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 30–49). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2008). Promoting positive affect. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 449–468). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1920, July 14). Young India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1924a, May 28). Young India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1924b, June 12). Young India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1931a, November 26). Young India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1931b, September 27). Address delivered at the Guild Hall. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1934, August 3). Amrita Bazaar Patrika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1940, August 25). Harijan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. (1970). The servant as leader. Indianapolis, IN: Center for Servant Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, L. L. (2012). Group cohesion then and now. Small Group Research, 43(6), 655–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, R. B. (1958). The power of nonviolence. Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groebel, J., & Hinde, R. (Eds.). (1989). Aggression and war. New York: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeyr, I. (2014). Gandhi and South African print culture. Seminar, 662, 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014. Houghton Mifflin.

  • House, R. J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge (pp. 189–207). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., & Baetz, M. L. (1979). Leadership: Some empirical generalizations and new research directions. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 399–401). Greenwood, Conn: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, R. (1983). Moral and political thought of Mahatma Gandhi. New York: Concord Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahanbegloo, R. (2018). The disobedient Indian: Towards a Gandhian philosophy of dissent. New Delhi: Speaking Tiger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, K. J. (2004). From persistence to pursuit: A longitudinal examination of momentum during the early stages of strategic change. Organization Science, 15, 276–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. (2007). Nonviolence: More than the absence of violence. In C. Webel & J. Galtung (Eds.), Handbook of peace and conflict studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2003). Field study of integrative negotiations. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9, 39–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1992). To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45, 321–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S. B. (2018, May 22). Finding your calling at work with Amy Wrzesniewski. Retrieved from scottbarrykaufman.com.

  • Kool, V. K. (Ed.). (1993). Nonviolence: Social and psychological issues. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kool, V. K. (2008). The psychology of nonviolence and aggression. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kool, V. K., & Agrawal, R. (2006). Applied social psychology: A global perspective. New Delhi: Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kool, V. K., & Agrawal, R. (2013). Whither Skinner’s science of behavior, his assessment of Gandhi, and its aftermath? Gandhi Marg, 35, 487–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kool, V. K., & Agrawal, R. (2018). Gandhian philosophy for living in the modern world: Lessons from satyagraha. In S. Fernando & R. Moodley (Eds.), Global psychologies: Mental health and the global south. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, H. (1965). Applied organizational change in industry: Structural, technological and humanistic approaches. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, A., King, E., Membere, A., & Cheung, H. K. (2017, July 28). Two types of diversity training that really work. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from hbr.org

  • Long, W. J., & Brecke, P. (2003). Reason and emotion in conflict resolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F. (1995). Organizational behavior. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, B. C., Luthans, F., & Luthans, K. W. (2015). Organizational behavior: An evidence based approach (13th ed.). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, D., & Bagher, M. (2010). Diversity training in organizations: An introduction. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34, 493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, J. R. (1990). On leadership: An alternative to the conventional wisdom. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 159–203). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., & Ritov, I. (2002). Initial perceptions in negotiations: Evaluation and response to logrolling offers. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 15, 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muceldili, B., & Erdil, O. (2015). Cultivating group cohesiveness: The role of collective energy. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 512–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudrack, P. E. (1989). Group cohesiveness and productivity: A closer look. Human Relations, 42, 771–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münsterberg, H. (1913). Psychology and industrial efficiency. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Münsterberg, H. (1914). Gründzuge der psychotechnik [Fundamentals of psychotechnology]. Leipzig: Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. C. (2000). Organizational behavior. Cincinnati, OH: Thomson-South Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareek, U., Rao, T. V., & Pestonjee, D. M. (1981). Behavioral processes in organizations. New Delhi: Oxford-IBH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parijat, P. (2014). Great transformational leaders-Gandhi, Napoleon and Lincoln-what business managers can learn from them. International Research Journal of Business and Management., 7, 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescosolido, A. T., & Saavedra, R. (2012). Cohesion and sports teams: A review. Small Group Research, 43(6), 744–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Park, N., Hall, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2009). Zest and work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. W., & Dutton, J. E. (2005). Coordination as energy in conversation. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 36–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. E. (2012, October 7). What Is charisma and charismatic leadership? Psychology Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, D. A. (2005). Beyond precision: Morality, decision making and collateral casualties. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 11, 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosh, L., Offermann, L. R., & Van Diest, R. (2012). Too close for comfort? Distinguishing between team intimacy and team cohesion. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. M. (1997). On energy, personality and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahibzada, J. (2018, October 23). Honestly dishonest: A behavioral model of financial dishonesty. Retrieved from www.linkedin.com.

  • Sanghavi, N. D. (2006). Gandhi: The agony of arrival. New Delhi: Rupa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S., Ellertson, N., McBride, D., & Gregory, D. (1951). An experimental study of cohesiveness and productivity. Human Relations, 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. (1998). Learned optimism. How to change your mind and your life. New York: Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEWA. (2020). Retrieved from www.sewa.org.

  • Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). Montreal, QC: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaria, A. (2014). Gandhi’s radical conservatism. Seminar, 662, 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1987). Whatever happened to psychology as the science of behavior? American Psychologist, 4, 780–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G., Sutclifee, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organizations Science, 16, 537–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tendulkar, D. G. (1951). Mahatma: Life of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (Vol. 2). Delhi: Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergauwe, J., De Fruyt, F., Wille, B., Hofmans, J., & Kaiser, R. (2017, May 29). The double-edged sword of leader charisma: Understanding the curvilinear relationship between charismatic personality and leader effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Published Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, H., Euwema, M. C., & Van Emmerik, I. J. (2009). Leadership and team cohesiveness across cultures. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 358–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, S. (2014). Can a team have too much cohesion? The dark side to network density. European Management Journal, 32(5), 703–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., McCauley, C. R., Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Jobs, careers, and callings: People’s relations to their work. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(1), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., Berg, J. M., & Dutton, J. E. (2010, June). Managing yourself: Turn the job you have into the job you want. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from hbr.org.

  • Zaleznik, A. (1990). The leadership gap. Academy of Management Executive, 4(1), 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., & Pan, W. (2007). Corporate culture. Shanghai: Tsinghua University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SUNY Polytechnic Institute, Utica, NY, USA

    V. K. Kool

  2. Harish Chandra Postgraduate College, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Rita Agrawal

Authors
  1. V. K. Kool
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rita Agrawal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kool, V.K., Agrawal, R. (2020). Gandhi’s Calling Orientation: Applications to Organizational Behavior. In: Gandhi and the Psychology of Nonviolence, Volume 2. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56989-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation