Abstract
Most conceptions of the smart city envision uses of technology that improve urban efficiencies, such as control of environmental variables and urban infrastructure. When smart city algorithms venture into areas related to the measurement and control of human behaviour, popular responses are often fractious. In this chapter, I discuss the reasons for such visceral responses and, in the context of Albert Borgmann’s “device paradigm,” I offer one potential positive use of the collection and use of such data to inject effective human context into the urban fabric and thereby to improve collective empathy and compassion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adli M, Berger M, Brakemeier E-L (2017) Neurourbanism: towards a new discipline. Lancet 4(3):183–185
Alexander C (2004) The nature of order: an essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe. Routledge, London
Bolsover G, Howard P (2017) Computational propaganda and political big data: moving toward a more critical research agenda. Big Data 5(4):273–276
Borgmann A (1984) Technology and character of contemporary life. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Coburn A, Kardan O, Kotabi H (2019) Psychological responses to natural patterns in architecture. J EnvPsyc 62:133–145
Ellard C (2017) Becoming the city. Conscious cities, https://theccd.org/article/becoming-the-city/
Ellard C (2020) Drawn to life: desire and the city, LA+, 11:26–33
Faris R, Dunham H (1939) Mental disorders in urban areas: an ecological study of schizophrenia and other psychoses. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago
Hackett R (2020) Did the “techlash” kill Alphabet’s city of the future? Available via Fortune. https://fortune.com/longform/alphabet-sidewalk-labs-quayside-toronto-techlash/. Accessed 23 Feb 2020
Ingraham N (2013) Larry Page’s dream of building a Google island could be coming true. Available via The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2016/4/26/11512256/google-sidewalk-lab-smart-city-dan-doctoroff-larry-page. Accessed 25 Feb 2019
Lederbogen F, Kirsch P, Haddad L et al (2011) City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing. Nature 474(23):498–501
Mau S (2019) The metric society: on the quantification of the social. Wiley, Hoboken
Pinker S (2015) The village effect: How face-to-face contact can make us healthier and happier. Vintage Canada, Toronto
Quercia D, Schiffanella R, Aiello LM (2013) The shortest path to happiness: recommending beautiful, quiet, and happy routes in the city. In: HT ’14: proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on hypertext and social media, pp 116–125
Sidewalk Toronto (2019) https://www.sidewalktoronto.ca/. Retrieved 23 Feb 2020
Turkle S (2016) The power of conversation: reclaiming talk in a digital age. Penguin
Zipp S, Storring N (eds) (2016) Vital little plans: the short works of Jane Jacobs. Random House Canada, Toronto
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ellard, C.G. (2021). There’s More Than One Kind of “Smart”: Big Data, Affect and Empathy in the City. In: Aldinhas Ferreira, M.I. (eds) How Smart Is Your City?. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 98. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56926-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56926-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56925-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56926-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)