Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Logistic Regression Model for Predicting Cost Performance According to Benefits Management Effort in New Product Development Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IJCIEOM 2020)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 337))

  • 732 Accesses

Abstract

This study gathered data from a sample of 35 Brazilian companies that develop new products and have PMOs in their organizational structure. Previous analyses show that Benefits Management (BM) is the only PMO function that is related to project performance in triple constraint, specifically the cost performance. This paper focuses on BM function to an in-depth understanding of its potential for improvements in cost performance. Logistic regression shows how impacted cost performance can be for each increment of effort in BM. Results can be used as a hypothesis for BM improvement according to predicted results on cost performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Project Management Institute (PMI), 2017. Project Management Body of Knowledge - PMBOK. 6th Edition. Pennsylvania. Project Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dai, C. X., and Wells, W. G., 2004. An exploration of project management office features and their relationship to project performance. Int J Proj Manag, 22(7), 523–532.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Julian, J., 2008. How project management office leaders facilitate cross-project learning and continuous improvement. Project Management Journal, 39(3), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor, H., Artman, E., and Woelfer, J. P., 2012. Information technology project risk management: bridging the gap between research and practice. Journal of Information Technology, 27(1), 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Martin, N. L., Pearson, J. M., and Furumo, K. A., 2007. Is Project Management: Size, Practices and the Project Management Office, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47(4), 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kutsch, E., Ward, J., Hall, M., and Algar, J., 2015. The contribution of the project management office: A balanced scorecard perspective. Information Systems Management, 32(2), 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aubry, M., Hobbs, B., Müller, R., and Blomquist, T., 2010a. Identifying forces driving PMO changes. Project Management Journal, 41(4), 30–45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aubry, M., Müller, R., Hobbs, B., and Blomquist, T., 2010b. Project management offices in transition. Int J Proj Manag, 28(8), 766–778.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bredillet, C., Tywoniak, S., and Tootoonchy, M., 2018. Why and how do project management offices change? A structural analysis approach. Int J Proj Manag, 36(5), 744–761.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aubry, M., and Brunet, M., 2016. Organizational design in public administration: Categorization of project management offices. Project Management Journal, 47(5), 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barbalho, S. C. M.; Toleldo, J. C.; Silva, I. A., 2019. The effect of stakeholders’ satisfaction and project management performance on transitions in a project management office. IEEE ACESS, 7, pp. 169385–169398

    Google Scholar 

  12. Garel, G., 2013. A history of project management models: From pre-models to the standard models. Int J Proj Manag, 31(5), 663–669.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The Cabinet Office (TCO), 2011. Managing Successful Programmes. 4th Edition. The Stationery Office, London. 301 pp. ISBN: 9780113313280

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rijke, J., Herk, S., Zevenbergen, C., Ashley, R., Hertogh, M., and ten Heuvelhof, E., 2014. Adaptive programme management through a balanced performance/ strategy oriented focus. Int J Proj Manag, 32(7), 1197–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Breese, R., Jenner, S., Serra, C. E. M., and Thorp, J., 2015. Benefits management: Lost or found in translation. Int J Proj Manag, 33(7), 1438–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sales, L. B., Barbalho, S. C. M., 2020. Identifying System Archetypes in Order to Comprehend and Improve the Program Management Practices in Organizations. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 67(1), 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zwikael, O., 2016. Int J Proj Manag special issue on “project benefit management”. Int J Proj Manag. 34(4), 734–735.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Musawir, A., Serra, C. E. M., Zwikael, O., and Ali, I., 2017. Project governance, benefit management, and project success: Towards a framework for supporting organizational strategy implementation. Int J Proj Manag, 35(8), 1658–1672.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barbalho, S. C. M., Carvalho, V. G., Silva, G. L., and Toledo, J. C., 2016. Analyzing the impact of the functions of Project Management Offices on triple constraints performance of new product projects. Product: Management & Development, 14(2), 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barbalho, S. C. M., da Silva, G. L., and de Toledo, J. C., 2017. The impact analysis of functions of Project Management Office on performance of triple constraint of new-product development projects. Dirección y Organización, (61), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D., 2008. Product design and development. McGraw-Hill Inc. New York, United States. 366 pp. ISBN: 9780072471465.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Clark, K. B., Fujimoto, T., and Cook, A., 1991. Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry (pp. 121–161). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barbalho, S. C. M.; Rozenfeld, H., 2013. Modelo de referência para o processo de desenvolvimento de produtos mecatrônicos (MRM): validação e resultados de uso. Gestão & Produção (UFSCAR. Impresso), v. 20, pp. 162–179.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cooper, R. G., and Kleinschmidt, E. J., 1995. Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development. J Prod Innov Manag: An International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association, 12(5), 374–391.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Griffin, A., and Page, A. L., 1996. PDMA success measurement project: recommended measures for product development success and failure. J Prod Innov Manag, 13(6), 478–496.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kahn, K. B., Barczak, G., and Moss, R., 2006. Perspective: establishing an NPD best practices framework. J Prod Innov Manag, 23(2), 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chiesa, V., and Frattini, F., 2007. Exploring the differences in performance measurement between research and development: evidence from a multiple case study. R&D Management, 37(4), 283–301.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Carvalho, M. M., Patah, L. A., and de Souza Bido, D., 2015. Project management and its effects on project success: Cross-country and cross-industry comparisons. Int J Proj Manag, 33(7), 1509–1522.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Badewi, A., 2016. The impact of project management (PM) and benefits management (BM) practices on project success: Towards developing a project benefits governance framework. Int J Proj Manag, 34(4), 761–778.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P., 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. ISBN: 978-0875846514.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Müller, R., Drouin, N., Sankaran, S., 2019. Modeling Organizational Project Management. Project Management Journal. V. 50(4), pp. 499–513.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hobbs, B., and Aubry, M., 2007. A multi-phase research program investigating project management offices (PMOs): the results of phase 1. Project management journal, 38(1), 74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, L., and Yetton, P., 2007. The contingent effects on project performance of conducting project reviews and deploying project management offices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(4), 789–799.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Spelta, A. G., and Albertin, A. L., 2012. Project management offices in the IT Area: A context–discriminant model for their establishment. Information Systems Management, 29(1), 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Unger, B. N., Gemünden, H. G., and Aubry, M., 2012. The three roles of a project portfolio management office: Their impact on portfolio management execution and success. Int J Proj Manag, 30(5), 608–620.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Spalek, S., 2013. Improving industrial engineering performance through a successful project management office. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 24(2), 88–98.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Aubry, M., 2015. Project management office transformations: Direct and moderating effects that enhance performance and maturity. Project Management Journal, 46(5), 19–45.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Breese, R., 2012. Benefits realization management: Panacea or false dawn?. Int J Proj Manag, 30(3), 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chih, Y. Y., and Zwikael, O., 2015. Project benefit management: A conceptual framework of target benefit formulation. Int J Proj Manag, 33(2), 352–362.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zwikael, O., Chih, Y. Y., and Meredith, J. R., 2018. Project benefit management: Setting effective target benefits. Int J Proj Manag, 36(4), 650–658.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Laursen, M., and Svejvig, P., 2016. Taking stock of project value creation: A structured literature review with future directions for research and practice. Int J Proj Manag, 34(4), 736–747.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Serra, C. E. M., and Kunc, M., 2015. Benefits realization management and its influence on project success and on the execution of business strategies. Int J Proj Manag, 33(1), 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jørgensen, M., 2016. A survey on the characteristics of projects with success in delivering client benefits. Information and Software Technology, 78, 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bussab, W.O., Morettin, P.A. (2014) Estatística básica. 6th edition. Saraiva. São Paulo. 540 pp. ISBN: 978-8502207998

    Google Scholar 

  45. Heiberger, R.M., Holland, B., 2004. Statistical Analysis and Data Display. Springer-Verlag, 1st. edition, New York. 730 pp. ISBN: 978-1-4757-4284-8.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hommel, G., 1989. A comparison of two modified Bonferroni procedures. Biometrika, 76(3), 624–625.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hochberg, Y., 1988. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75(4), 800–802.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y., 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  49. McCullagh, P., 1980. Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 42(2), 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Peterson, B., and Harrell Jr, F. E.,1990. Partial proportional odds models for ordinal response variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 39(2), 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mossalam, A., and Arafa, M., 2016. The role of project manager in benefits realization management as a project constraint/driver. HBRC Journal, 12(3), 305–315.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Exact Sciences Institute, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil

    Gladston Luiz da Silva

  2. Technology College, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil

    Sanderson César Macêdo Barbalho

Authors
  1. Gladston Luiz da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sanderson César Macêdo Barbalho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanderson César Macêdo Barbalho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial Engineering Department, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Antônio Márcio Tavares Thomé

  2. Engenharia de Produção, Federal Center for Technological Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Rafael Garcia Barbastefano

  3. Departamento de Engenharia Industrial, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Luiz Felipe Scavarda

  4. DEGEIT and GOVCOPP, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

    João Carlos Gonçalves dos Reis

  5. DEGEIT and GOVCOPP, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

    Marlene Paula Castro Amorim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

da Silva, G.L., Barbalho, S.C.M. (2020). Logistic Regression Model for Predicting Cost Performance According to Benefits Management Effort in New Product Development Projects. In: Thomé, A.M.T., Barbastefano, R.G., Scavarda, L.F., dos Reis, J.C.G., Amorim, M.P.C. (eds) Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. IJCIEOM 2020. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 337. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56920-4_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation