Skip to main content

‘By God’s Arse’: Genre, Humour and Religion in William Wager’s Moral Interludes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Humour, History, and Methodology

Abstract

This chapter reflects on the theoretical problem raised by the depiction of reprobate protagonists and their demise in two plays that present themselves emphatically as comedies and humorous drama. Rather than taken seriously as fully fledged Christian comedies, William Wager’s Reformation interludes The Longer Thou Livest the More Fool Thou Art and Enough Is as Good as a Feast have been interpreted as early tragedies or dismissed as flawed comedies because of what critics have regarded as their tragic endings and coarse humour. I argue that while the plays’ theology was informed by the new Protestant doctrine of double predestination, its humour was still firmly rooted in a late medieval appreciation of comedy as a weapon against evil and instrument of Christian hope. From this perspective, even the portrayals of the deaths of the protagonists can be perceived as comforting and fitting as genuinely comedic endings. The plays help us gain a more complex understanding of the historical correlation between humour and religion.

I would like to thank Jillian Snyder and Robert Pierce for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this chapter. Of course, all mistakes and inadequacies are my own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Anonymous, ‘The Second Shepherds’ Pageant from Wakefield’, ll. 535–38.

  2. 2.

    See, for instance, the second chapter of Bowers, Radical Comedy.

  3. 3.

    Bowers, Radical Comedy, 15.

  4. 4.

    Gilhus, Laughing Gods, 84, 94.

  5. 5.

    Thomas, ‘The Place of Laughter’, 79.

  6. 6.

    See, for instance, Ghose, Shakespeare and Laughter, 133; Burke, Popular Culture, 295.

  7. 7.

    Grantley, English Dramatic Interludes, 91.

  8. 8.

    ‘humour’, Oxford English Dictionary, 9b.

  9. 9.

    Wager, The Longer Thou Liuest, sig A1r; Wager, Inough Is as Good as a Feast, sig A1r. All further references to these works are to R. Mark Benbow’s modern edition. One of the few scholars who have noted the contrast between the plays’ endings and descriptions as comedies is Spivack, Shakespeare and the Allegory of Evil, 114.

  10. 10.

    Woodes, The Conflict of Conscience. Sig. A1r. It is worth noting that this play has two alternative endings, one featuring the damnation of the protagonist and the other his redemptive death-bed conversion.

  11. 11.

    Wager, Enough, ll. 34–36, 83–84.

  12. 12.

    Potter, The English Morality Play, 57.

  13. 13.

    Streete, Protestantism and Drama in Early Modern England, 8; Doran and Durston, Princes, Pastors, and People, 25.

  14. 14.

    Rozett, The Doctrine of Election, passim.

  15. 15.

    Ibid., 88, 93. Potter, The English Morality Play, 117–19.

  16. 16.

    Guinle, ‘Where Angels Fear to Tread’, 156.

  17. 17.

    Benbow, ‘Introduction’, xiv.

  18. 18.

    Ibid., xvi.

  19. 19.

    Spivack, Shakespeare and the Allegory of Evil, 174, 229, 248; Bevington, From Mankind to Marlowe, 163, 183.

  20. 20.

    Tarantino, ‘Between Peterborough and Pentecost’, 76.

  21. 21.

    Ibid., 75.

  22. 22.

    Wager, The Longer Thou Livest, ll. 409, 501, 504.

  23. 23.

    Ibid., ll. 472–76.

  24. 24.

    Ibid., ll. 341, 345, 347, 356.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., ll. 389, 393.

  26. 26.

    Ibid., ll. 379, 1092, 425.

  27. 27.

    Ibid., ll. 1265–68.

  28. 28.

    Tarantino, ‘Between Peterborough and Pentecost’, 56.

  29. 29.

    Ibid., 81.

  30. 30.

    Ibid., 79–80.

  31. 31.

    Kolve, The Play Called Corpus Christi, 139.

  32. 32.

    Ibid., 134.

  33. 33.

    Gilhus, Laughing Gods, Weeping Virgins, 98–102.

  34. 34.

    Ibid., 102.

  35. 35.

    Prescott, ‘The Ambivalent Heart’, passim; Mallinson, ‘Humor’, 350.

  36. 36.

    Benbow, The Longer Thou Livest, 98 n379. All scriptural references are taken from the Geneva Bible.

  37. 37.

    Wager, The Longer Thou Livest, l. 1799.

  38. 38.

    Ibid., ll. 1805–6.

  39. 39.

    Ibid., ll. 1857–58.

  40. 40.

    Benbow, The Longer Thou Livest, 141 n1401.

  41. 41.

    Wager, The Longer Thou Livest, l. 1415.

  42. 42.

    Marlowe, Dr Faustus (A-Text) 5.1.116–18.

  43. 43.

    Ibid., 2.3.80.

  44. 44.

    Ibid., 5.2.113. See also Nuttall, The Alternative Trinity, 46–48. In the B-text, the phrase ‘My God, my God’ was replaced with ‘O mercy, heaven!’ According to Nuttall, this ‘suggests strongly that contemporaries of Marlowe noticed the biblical echo and were made uncomfortable by it’ (46n.).

  45. 45.

    Marlowe, Dr Faustus (B-Text), 5.3.4, 6–7.

  46. 46.

    Screech, Laughter at the Foot of the Cross, 57, 58.

  47. 47.

    Ibid., 307.

  48. 48.

    Spivack, Shakespeare and the Allegory of Evil, 248.

  49. 49.

    Berger, Redeeming Laughter, 13.

  50. 50.

    Ibid.

  51. 51.

    Ibid., 195.

  52. 52.

    Ibid., 196.

  53. 53.

    Ibid.

  54. 54.

    Ibid.

  55. 55.

    Potter, The English Morality Play, 119.

  56. 56.

    Quoted in Cressy and Ferrell (ed.) Religion and Society in Early Modern England, 74.

  57. 57.

    Ibid.

  58. 58.

    Stachniewski, The Persecutory Imagination, 46.

  59. 59.

    Rozett, The Doctrine of Election; Diehl, Staging Reform; Streete, Protestantism and Drama in Early Modern England; Waldron, Reformations of the Body; Mullaney, The Reformation of Emotions.

  60. 60.

    Potter, The English Morality Play, 117.

  61. 61.

    Morreall, Comedy, Tragedy and Religion, 2.

  62. 62.

    Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript, 432–33.

  63. 63.

    Lippitt, Humour and Irony in Kierkegaard’s Thought, 130.

  64. 64.

    Ibid., 130.

  65. 65.

    Ibid., 132–33.

  66. 66.

    Cox, The Feast of Fools, 150, 153.

Bibliography

  • Amir, Lydia B. Humor and the Good Life in Modern Philosophy: Shaftesbury, Hamann, Kierkegaard. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. ‘The Second Shepherds’ Pageant from Wakefield’. In Medieval Drama, edited by David Bevington, 383–408. Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbow, R. Mark. Editor. The Longer Thou Livest and Enough Is As Good as a Feast. London: Edward Arnold, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L. Redeeming Laughter: The Comic Dimension of Human Experience. Second Edition. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, Rick. Radical Comedy in Early Modern England: Contexts, Cultures, Performances. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Peter. Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe. Third Edition. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Noel. Humour: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Harvey. The Feast of Fools: A Theological Essay on Festivity and Fantasy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cressy, David, and Lori Anne Ferrell. Religion and Society in Early Modern England: A Sourcebook. Second Edition. New York: Routledge, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, Huston. Staging Reform, Reforming the Stage: Protestantism and Popular Theater in Early Modern England. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, Susan, and Christopher Durston. Princes, Pastors, and People: The Church and Religion in England, 1500–1700. Second Edition. London: Routledge, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghose, Indira. Shakespeare and Laughter: A Cultural History. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilhus, Ingvild Sælid. Laughing Gods, Weeping Virgins: Laughter in the History of Religion. London and New York: Routledge, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grantley, Darryll. English Dramatic Interludes, 1300–1580. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guinle, Francis. ‘“Where Angels Fear to Tread”: Allegory and Protestant Ideology in The Longer Thou Livest, The More Fool Thou Art (1559) and Enough is as Good as a Feast (1560)’. In Tudor Theatre: Allegory in the Theatre. Volume 5. 145–58. Bern: Peter Lang, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘humour | humor, n.’. OED Online. December 2019. Oxford University Press. www.oed.com/view/Entry/89416 (accessed January 25, 2020).

  • Kierkegaard, Søren. Concluding Unscientific Postscript, edited and translated by Alastair Hannay. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolve, A.A. The Play Called Corpus Christi. London: Edward Arnold, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippitt, John. Humour and Irony in Kierkegaard’s Thought. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mallinson, Jeff C. ‘Humor.’ In Encyclopedia of Martin Luther and the Reformation, Vol. 2, edited by Mark A. Lamport, 350–51. Lanham etc.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, Christopher. Doctor Faustus: A Two-Text Edition (A-Text, 1604; B-Text, 1616) Contexts and Sources Criticism. Edited by David Scott Kastan. New York and London: W. W. Norton, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morreall, John. Comedy, Tragedy and Religion. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullaney, Steven. The Reformation of Emotions in the Age of Shakespeare. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, A.D. The Alternative Trinity: Gnostic Heresy in Marlowe, Milton, and Blake. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, Robert. The English Morality Play: Origins, Influence and History of a Dramatic Tradition. London and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, Anne Lake. ‘The Ambivalent Heart: Thomas More’s Merry Tales’. Criticism 45, no. 4 (2003): 417–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozett, Martha Tuck. The Doctrine of Election and the Emergence of Elizabethan Tragedy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Screech, Michael A. Laughter at the Foot of the Cross. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spivack, Bernard. Shakespeare and the Allegory of Evil: The History of a Metaphor in Relation to His Major Villians. New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachniewski, John. The Persecutory Imagination: English Puritanism and the Literature of Religious Despair. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streete, Adrian. Protestantism and Drama in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tarantino, Elisabetta. ‘“Between Peterborough and Pentecost”: Nonsense and Sin in William Wager’s Morality Plays’. In Nonsense and Other Senses: Regulated Absurdity in Literature, edited by Elisabetta Tarantino with Carlo Caruso, 55–85. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Keith. ‘The Place of Laughter in Tudor and Stuart England’. Times Literary Supplement, January 21, 1977. 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wager, William. The Longer Thou Liuest the More Foole Thou Art. London: Wyllyam How, 1569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wager, William. Inough Is as Good as a Feast. London: Iohn Allde, 1570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, Jennifer. Reformations of the Body: Idolatry, Sacrifice and Early Modern Theater. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woodes, Nathaniel. The Conflict of Conscience. London: Richarde Bradocke, 1581.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lieke Stelling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stelling, L. (2020). ‘By God’s Arse’: Genre, Humour and Religion in William Wager’s Moral Interludes. In: Derrin, D., Burrows, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Humour, History, and Methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56646-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56646-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56645-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56646-3

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics