Skip to main content

‘Lightness and Maistrye’: Herod, Humour, and Temptation in Early English Drama

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Humour, History, and Methodology

Abstract

Performance and spectacle were central components of the late medieval world, and humour played an essential role in dramatic endeavours. In England and elsewhere late medieval ‘Mystery Plays’ dramatised holy narratives of the history of the world for broad and ‘popular’ audiences, wielding comic elements and raising laughter in a way that ultimately reinforced devotional orthodoxy. This chapter sets out in part to question the prevailing assumption that such performed humour was highly simplistic, created for audiences lacking the sort of sophistication taken for granted in spectators of the proceeding centuries. It does so by reassessing the critical application of ‘Superiority Theory’ to a number of plays from the ‘York Cycle’ and the Towneley MS starring the tyrant Herod. Herod was loudly bombastic, posturing, and evil, drawn comically in ways that made his character incredibly popular—despite the fact that contemporary audiences would have considered him a historical figure, who committed atrocities and attempted to kill Christ. This chapter complicates the long-held convention that within this dramatic tradition humour was present solely to mock evil or folly. Instead, it is argued that a far more complicated dynamic is being staged here, where laughter and temptation are brought hand-in-hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bakhtin, Rabelais and His World, 6, 72, 82. Indeed, within this dichotomy ‘folk culture’ is an ambiguous and—in the context of early biblical drama especially—a misleading label.

  2. 2.

    McGavin and Walker, Imagining Spectatorship, 8–16; Richardson, ‘The Other Readers’ Response’, 31–33, 44–46; see also Lopez, Theatrical Convention and Audience Response, 13–34.

  3. 3.

    See for example Williams, ‘The Comic in the Cycles’, 109–23; Wickham, ‘Medieval Comic Traditions and the Beginnings of English Comedy’, 40–62; Tricomi, ‘Re–Envisioning England’s Medieval Cycle Comedy’, 11–26; Diller, ‘Laughter in Medieval English Drama’, 1–19.

  4. 4.

    Staines, ‘To Out–Herod Herod’, 31–32; Wright, ‘Acoustic Tyranny’, 4–7.

  5. 5.

    Mitchell-Buck, ‘Tyrants, Tudors, and the Digby Mary Magdalen’, 241.

  6. 6.

    See Epp, ‘Passion, Pomp, and Parody’, 157; Wright, ‘Acoustic Tyranny’, esp. 10–14.

  7. 7.

    Mitchell-Buck, ‘Tyrants, Tudors, and the Digby Mary Magdalen’, 256 n.1: she cites Records of Early English Drama: Coventry, 61.

  8. 8.

    Chaucer, ‘The Miller’s Tale’, in The Riverside Chaucer, 70–71, ll.3383–86; Shakespeare, Hamlet, 3.2. ll.13–14.

  9. 9.

    Gray, ‘Caesar as Comic Antichrist’, 1–31; Harris, Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare, 80–84.

  10. 10.

    Carpenter, ‘New Evidence: Vives and Audience Response’,10.

  11. 11.

    Weimann, Shakespeare and the Popular Tradition in the Theater, 70–71.

  12. 12.

    Gilhus, Laughing Gods, Weeping Virgins, 97; see also Godfrey, ‘Herod’s Reputation and the Killing of the Children’, 271.

  13. 13.

    Staines, ‘To Out–Herod Herod’, 31–2.

  14. 14.

    Ibid., 36.

  15. 15.

    Skey, ‘Herod the Great in Medieval European Drama’, 332–33.

  16. 16.

    See Wright, ‘Acoustic Tyranny’, 18, 21.

  17. 17.

    Staines, ‘To Out–Herod Herod’, 50–51.

  18. 18.

    Ramey, ‘The Audience-Interactive Games’, 60.

  19. 19.

    See Mitchell-Buck, ‘Maintaining the Realm’, 184; Records of Early English Drama Coventry, 71; Records of Early English Drama: York, I, 47–48. The proto-Christian nature of the Magi sets them in stark contrast to Herod, although all of them were probably portrayed as visually interesting ‘Oriental’ figures. See Ashley, ‘Strange and Exotic’, 84–85.

  20. 20.

    Records of Early English Drama: York, I, 334.

  21. 21.

    See Smith, Images of Islam, 94–5; also Hourihane, Pontius Pilate, Anti–Semitism, and the Passion in Medieval Art, 148, 153, 271–2.

  22. 22.

    Leach, ‘Some English Plays and Players’, 205–34, 213–34; Woolf, The English Mystery Plays, 391–92, ft. 64. Twycross and Carpenter, Masks and Unmasking in Medieval and Early Tudor England, 216.

  23. 23.

    Akbari, ‘Placing the Jews in Late Medieval English Literature’, 33; Harris, Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare, 80–84.

  24. 24.

    All quotations are taken from Epp, The Towneley Plays and Davidson, The York Corpus Christi Plays.

  25. 25.

    Ashley, ‘Strange and Exotic’, 77.

  26. 26.

    See Lilley, City and Cosmos, 20–25, 78.; Morris, ‘Pilgrimage to Jerusalem in the Middle Ages’, 141–63, esp. 143–44; Norako, ‘Crusades in Literature’, 575–83.

  27. 27.

    Lomperis, ‘Medieval Travel Writing and the Question of Race’, 147–56, esp. 153–54; Mittman, Maps and Monsters in Medieval England; also Wittkower, ‘Marvels of the East. A Study in the History of Monsters’, 159–97.

  28. 28.

    Herod’s feigned control of the skies is set up in contrast with the learned astronomical practices of the Magi. See Beadle, The York Plays, II, 131. On contemporary interest in classical deities see Phillips, ‘Medieval Classical Romances’, 3–25; Fumo, The Legacy of Apollo, esp. 76–123.

  29. 29.

    Williams, The French Fetish from Chaucer to Shakespeare, 58–59.

  30. 30.

    Medieval Drama, ed. Walker, 200, l.115.

  31. 31.

    McGavin, ‘Medieval Theatricality and Spectatorship’, 194–95.

  32. 32.

    See Akbari, Idols in the East, 200–203.

  33. 33.

    Akbari, ‘The Rhetoric of Antichrist in Western Lives of Muhammad’, 297–307. See also The Prophet of Islam in Old French, trans. and ed. Hyatte, 2–12; Paull, ‘The Figure of Mahomet in the Towneley Cycle’, 192, 197, 201.

  34. 34.

    Parker, The Aesthetics of Antichrist, 95–96; see also Taylor, ‘The Once and Future Herod’, 126–27.

  35. 35.

    See Tolan, ‘European accounts of Muhammad’s life’, 226–250, esp. 232; Meserve, Empires of Islam in Renaissance Historical, 9–14.

  36. 36.

    Akbari, ‘Rhetoric of the Antichrist’, 298, 302–3.

  37. 37.

    Eppley, ‘A New Perspective on Islam in Henrician England’, 593.

  38. 38.

    Whilst the Crucifixion is of course another result of Herod’s evil, in neither York nor Towneley is the tyrant actually a witness to this event.

  39. 39.

    Godfrey, ‘Herod’s Reputation and the Killing of the Children’, 271.

  40. 40.

    Edminster, The Preaching Fox, 165–67.

  41. 41.

    On the comic character Watkyn in this episode in the N–Town Plays see McMurray Gibson, The Theater of Devotion, 42.

  42. 42.

    Lewis, Screwtape Letters, 55.

  43. 43.

    McGavin and Walker, Imagining Spectatorship, 8–16

Bibliography

  • Akbari, Suzanne Conklin. ‘Placing the Jews in Late Medieval English Literature’. In Orientalism and the Jews, edited by Ivan Davidson Kalmar and Derek J. Penslar, 32–50. London: University Press of New England, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbari, Suzanne Conklin. ‘The Rhetoric of Antichrist in Western Lives of Muhammad’. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 8, no. 3 (1997): 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbari, Suzanne Conklin. Idols in the East: European Representations of Islam and the Orient 1100–1450. London: Cornell University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, Kathleen M. ‘“Strange and Exotic: Representing the Other in Medieval and Renaissance Performance’. In East of West: Cross–Cultural Performance and the Staging of Difference, edited by Claire Sponsler and Xiomei Chen, 77–92. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Translated by Helene Iswolsky. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, Richard. The York Plays: A Critical Edition of the York Corpus Christi Play as recorded in British Library Additional MS 35290. 2 Vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Sarah. ‘New Evidence: Vives and Audience Response to Biblical Drama’. Medieval English Theatre 31 (2009): 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Riverside Chaucer. Edited by Larry D. Benson, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colding Smith, Charlotte. Images of Islam, 1453–1600: Turks in Germany and Central Europe. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diller, Hans–Jürgen. ‘Laughter in Medieval English Drama: A Critique of Modernizing and Historical Analyses’. Comparative Drama 36, no.1 (2002): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edminster, Warren. The Preaching Fox: Elements of Festive Subversion in the Plays of the Wakefield Master. London: Routledge, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Epp, Garrett. ‘Passion, Pomp, and Parody: Alliteration in the York Plays’. Medieval English Theatre 11 (1992): 150–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppley, Daniel. ‘A New Perspective on Islam in Henrician England: The Polemics of Christopher St. German’. Sixteenth Century Journal 46, no. 3 (2015): 587–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumo, Jamie Claire. The Legacy of Apollo: Antiquity, Authority and Chaucerian Poetics. London: University of Toronto Press, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilhus, Ingvild S. Laughing Gods, Weeping Virgins: Laughter in the History of Religion. London: Routledge, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, Bob. ‘Herod’s Reputation and the Killing of the Children: Some Theatrical Consequences’. In Staging Scripture: Biblical Drama, 1350–1600, edited by Peter Happé and Wim Hüsken, 253–78. Leiden: Brill, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Patrick. ‘Caesar as Comic Antichrist: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and the Medieval English Stage Tyrant’. Comparative Drama 50 (2016): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Jonathan Gil. Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hourihane, Colum. Pontius Pilate, Anti–Semitism, and the Passion in Medieval Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, A. F. ‘Some English Plays and Players’. In An English Miscellany: Presented to Dr. Furnivall in Honour of his Seventy–Fifth Birthday, edited by William Paton Ker, Arthur S. Napier and Walter W. Skeat, 205–34. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C.S. The Screwtape Letters: with Screwtape Proposes a Toast (Sixtieth Anniversary Edition). London: Harper Collins, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilley, Keith D. City and Cosmos: The Medieval World in Urban Form. London: Reaktion Books, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomperis, Linda. ‘Medieval Travel Writing and the Question of Race’. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 31, no.1 (2001):147–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Jeremy. Theatrical Convention and Audience Response in Early Modern Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGavin, John J. ‘Medieval Theatricality and Spectatorship’. Theta: Théâtre Tudor 8 (2009): 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGavin, John J., and Greg Walker. Imagining Spectatorship: From the Mysteries to the Shakespearean Stage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McMurray Gibson, Gail. The Theater of Devotion: East Anglian Drama and Society in the Late Middle Ages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medieval Drama: An Anthology. Edited by Greg Walker. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meserve, Margaret. Empires of Islam in Renaissance Historical Thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell–Buck, Heather S. ‘Tyrants, Tudors, and the Digby Mary Magdalen’. Comparative Drama 48, no. 3 (2014): 241–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell–Buck, Heather S. ‘Maintaining the Realm: City, Commonwealth, and Crown in Chester’s Midsummer Plays’. In The Chester Cycle in Context, 1555–1575: Religion, Drama, and the Impact of Change, edited by Jessica Dell and David Klausner, 179–92. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittman, Asa. Maps and Monsters in Medieval England. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Colin. ‘Pilgrimage to Jerusalem in the Middle Ages. In Pilgrimage: The English Experience from Becket to Bunyan, edited by Colin Morris and Peter Roberts, 141–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norako, Leila K. ‘Crusades in Literature’. In The Encyclopedia of Medieval Literature in Britain, Vol. 1 (4 Vols.), edited by Siân Echard and Robert Rouse, 575–83. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, John. The Aesthetics of Antichrist: From Christian Drama to Christopher Marlowe. London: Cornell University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paull, Michael. ‘The Figure of Mahomet in the Towneley Cycle’. Comparative Drama 6, no. 3 (1972): 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Helen. ‘Medieval Classical Romances: The Perils of Inheritance’. In Christianity and Romance in Medieval England, edited by Rosalind Field, Philippa Hardman, and Michelle Sweeney, 3–25. Cambridge: Brewer, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, Peter. ‘The Audience–Interactive Games of Middle English Religious Drama’. Comparative Drama 47, no. 1 (2013): 55–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Records of Early English Drama: Coventry. Edited by R. W. Ingram. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Records of Early English Drama: York. 2 Volumes. Translated and edited by Alexandra F. Johnston and Margaret Rogerson. Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Brian. ‘The Other Readers’ Response: On Multiple, Divided and Oppositional Audiences’. Criticism 39, no. 1 (1997): 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Edited by Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor. London: Thomson Learning for the Arden Shakespeare, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skey, Miriam. ‘Herod the Great in Medieval European Drama’. Comparative Drama, 13, no. 4 (1979): 33–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staines, David. ‘To Out–Herod Herod: The Development of a Dramatic Character’. Comparative Drama 10, no.1 (1976): 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Christopher. ‘The Once and Future Herod: Vernacular Typology and the Unfolding of Middle English Cycle Drama’. New Medieval Literatures 15 (2013): 119–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Prophet of Islam in Old French: The Romance of Muhammad (1258) and the Book of Muhammad’s Ladder (1264). Translated and edited by Reginald Hyatte. Leiden: Brill, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Towneley Plays. Edited by Garrett Epp. Kalamazoo, Michigan: Medieval Institute Publications, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • The York Corpus Christi Plays. Edited by Clifford Davidson. Kalamazoo, Michigan: Medieval Institute Publications, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolan, John V. ‘European accounts of Muhammad’s life’. In The Cambridge Companion to Muhammad, edited by Jonathan E. Brockopp, 226–250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricomi, Albert H. ‘Re–Envisioning England’s Medieval Cycle Comedy’. Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 5 (1991): 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twycross, Meg, and Sarah Carpenter. Masks and Unmasking in Medieval and Early Tudor England. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimann, Robert. Shakespeare and the Popular Tradition in the Theater: Studies in the Social Dimension of Dramatic Form and Function. Edited by Robert Schwartz. London: John Hopkins University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, Glynne. ‘Medieval Comic Traditions and the Beginnings of English Comedy’. In Comic Drama: The European Heritage, edited by W.D. Howarth, 40–62. London: Methuen, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Arnold. ‘The Comic in the Cycles’. In Medieval Drama, edited by Neville Denny, 109–23. London: Arnold, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Deanne. The French Fetish from Chaucer to Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittkower, Rudolf. ‘Marvels of the East. A Study in the History of Monsters’ Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 5 (1942): 159–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, Rosemary. The English Mystery Plays. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Clare. ‘Acoustic Tyranny: Metre, Alliteration, and Voice in Christ before Herod’. Medieval English Theatre 34 (2012): 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beckett, J. (2020). ‘Lightness and Maistrye’: Herod, Humour, and Temptation in Early English Drama. In: Derrin, D., Burrows, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Humour, History, and Methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56646-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56646-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56645-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56646-3

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics