Skip to main content

Assessing and Understanding Early Numeracy for Students with Additional Learning Needs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Students with Additional Needs as Learners

Abstract

Almost 5% of Australian students fail to reach minimum standards for numeracy as assessed on the national assessment and monitoring program, and this is of particular concern in light of evidence that poor numeracy contributes to lifelong problems such as difficulty getting and maintaining employment. Learning progressions, particularly in mathematics, have been identified as effective ways to support teachers’ understanding of skill development and connect assessment and pedagogy. The aim of the study described in this chapter was to design an assessment of early numeracy skills for students with additional learning needs that could be mapped to a learning progression. Trialled with 2597 students from 65 schools, a set of items based on teacher observation and judgement measured skills that provide a foundation for participation in numeracy learning across the school years. Analysis of the data, using a partial credit approach to item response modelling, found that the items could describe numeracy learning across a broad range of proficiency, although gaps were identified for students at the highest and lowest extremes of numeracy understanding. Analysis of differential item functioning (DIF) suggested that the items measured numeracy skills and understanding consistently for students with different sub types of additional learning need.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, R., & Khoo, S. T. (1996). Quest. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R., Wu, M., Macaskill, G., Haldane, S., & Xun Sun, X. (2015). ConQuest. Berkley, CA: Australian Council for Educational Research, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2015). NAPLAN achievement in Reading, persuasive writing, language conventions and numeracy: National report for 2015. Sydney, Australia: ACARA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnie, B. F. (2015). Making the case for differentiation. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 88(2), 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2014.998601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., Wilson, M., & Yao, S. Y. (2011). Road maps for learning: A guide to the navigation of learning progressions. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 9(2–3), 71–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2016). Access to real learning: The impact of policy, funding and culture on students with disability, being a report of the Senate Standing Committee on Education. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service. Retrieved 18 January 2016 from http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Education_and_Employment/students_with_disability/Report

  • Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K. C., Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2015). Making early math education work for all children: Prekindergarten teachers lay the foundation for later success in mathematics when they attend to the concepts that young children can and should learn. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(3), 63–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel, R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Numerical Cognition, 44(1–2), 43–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., & Butterworth, B. (2005). Number and language: How are they related? Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(1), 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from www.ccsso.org/content/PDFs/FAST%20Learning%20Progressions.pdf

  • Hiniker, A., Rosenberg-Lee, M., & Menon, V. (2016). Distinctive role of symbolic number sense in mediating the mathematical abilities of children with autism. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 46, 1268–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2666-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, M. (2011). Number relationships in preschool. Teaching Children Mathematics, 17(9), 550–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleemans, T., Peeters, M., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2012). Child and home predictors of early numeracy skills in kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 471–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeFevre, J., Skwarchuk, S., Smith-Chant, B. L., Fast, L., Kamawar, D., & Bisanz, J. (2009). Home numeracy experiences and children’s math performance in the early school years. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaisier, M. A., Bergmann Tiest, W. M., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2009). One, two, three, many – Subistising in active touch. Acta Psychologica, 131, 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2012). Early numerical competencies and students with mathematics difficulty. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(5), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purpura, D. J., & Napoli, A. M. (2015). Early literacy and numeracy: Untangling the relation between specific components. Mathematical thinking and learning: An International Journal, 17, 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960/1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Department of Education and Training (DET). (2016). ABLES. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/teachingresources/diversity/Pages/ables.aspx.

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1929/1993). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 2: The fundamentals of defectology (Abnormal psychology and learning disabilities) (R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton, Trans.). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item-response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, K., & Griffin, P. (2013). Judgement-based performance measures of literacy for students with additional needs: Seeing students through the eyes of experienced special education teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(3), 325–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1999). Measurement essentials (2nd ed.). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range Inc..

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

An earlier version of this chapter was included on the Australian Association for Research in Education’s (AARE) website as a refereed conference paper from the 2016 AARE Annual Conference.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Strickland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Strickland, J., Woods, K., Pavlovic, M. (2020). Assessing and Understanding Early Numeracy for Students with Additional Learning Needs. In: Griffin, P., Woods, K. (eds) Understanding Students with Additional Needs as Learners. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56596-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56596-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56595-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56596-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics