Skip to main content

Using Symbols to Make Meaning: Functional Literacy for Students with Additional Needs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Students with Additional Needs as Learners
  • 1397 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes the design and validation of an observation survey of skills that students build as they learn how to make meaning using symbols, including pictures and the components and conventions of written text, as well as trials of the survey by teachers of students with diverse additional needs, development of learning progressions to support teachers’ instructional planning, and work with teachers to identify teaching strategies targeted to each level on the progressions. As with each of the SWANs studies, the work of school leaders with their students, family members, teachers and, in this case, literacy learning specialists guided the research and ensured it met legislated requirements for equitable provision of learning opportunities and respected the aspirations that families held for their children. This research into the assessment and teaching of functional literacy skills for students with additional needs took place concurrently with the research into communication skills described in Chap. 2 (see also Woods K, The design and validation of measures of communication and literacy to support the instruction of students with learning disabilities. Doctoral thesis, The University of Melbourne, Australia, 2010, Woods K, Griffin P, Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract 20(3):325–348, 2013). The studies described here stretched over a period of almost 10 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, M. S., Griffin, P., & Snow, C. E. (1999). Starting out right: A guide to promoting children’s reading success. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. (1967). The reading behaviour of five year old children: A research report. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 2(1), 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., & Prior, M. (2007). Learning to read in Australia. Canberra, Australia: The Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1992). Review and commentary: Stages of spelling development. In S. Templeton & D. R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 307–332). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301–330). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, L. A., & Bondy, A. S. (1994). The picture exchange communication system training manual. Cherry Hill, NJ: Pyramid Educational Consultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, J. R., & Gillet, J. W. (1993). Teaching kids to spell. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. L., & Moats, L. C. (1999). Straight talk about reading: How parents can make a difference during the early years. Chicago: Contemporary Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, D. (1979). The foundations of literacy. Sydney, Australia: Ashton Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalongo, M. R. (2003). Early childhood language arts. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamme, L. L. (1979). Handwriting in an early childhood curriculum. Young Children, 35(1), 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., & Berninger, V. W. (1999). Those who know, teach well: Helping teachers master literacy-related subject-matter knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(4), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori method: Scientific pedagogy as applied to child education in “the children’s houses” (Anne E. George, Trans.). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oken-Wright, P. (1998). Transition to writing: Drawing as a scaffold for emergent writing. Young Children, 53(3), 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear-Swerling, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Off track: When poor readers become ‘learning disabled’. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer-Azaroff, B., Hoffman, A. O., Horton, C. B., Bondy, A., & Frost, L. (2009). The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS): What do the data say? Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24(2), 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Melbourne. (2019). Assessment research centre online tools. Retrieved 25 September 2019 from https://education.unimelb.edu.au/about/educational-software-suite/arc-online-tools.

  • Victorian Department of Education and Training. (2019). Abilities Based Learning and Education Support (ABLES). Retrieved 23 September 2019 from https://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/learningneeds/Pages/ables.aspx

  • Woods, K. (2010). The design and validation of measures of communication and literacy to support the instruction of students with learning disabilities. Doctoral thesis. The University of Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, K., & Griffin, P. (2013). Judgment-based performance measures of literacy for students with additional needs: Seeing students through the eyes of experienced special education teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(3), 325–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. (2003). The application of item response theory to measure problem-solving proficiencies. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerry Woods .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Woods, K., Griffin, P. (2020). Using Symbols to Make Meaning: Functional Literacy for Students with Additional Needs. In: Griffin, P., Woods, K. (eds) Understanding Students with Additional Needs as Learners. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56596-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56596-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56595-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56596-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics