Abstract
Thinking is a learnable skill that has been emphasised in curricula internationally. However, there are few resources available to teach thinking skills to students with additional needs. The aim of this study was to develop a measure of thinking skills to provide teachers with an integrated system of assessment, reporting, planning, and instructional advice.
This chapter describes a phase of the research in which teachers collaborated to propose and review a bank of thinking skills instructional advice for students with additional needs. Participants (n = 16) were leading teachers with experience teaching thinking skills to students with additional needs from specialist settings for school-age students (5–20 years) or mainstream primary schools. Teachers were provided with a partially completed individual learning plan (ILP) for one de-identified student representing one of eight learning levels of a thinking skills progression. Included in the partially completed ILPs were strategies assembled from a review of evidence-based instructional strategies for thinking skills that were matched to the case study student’s level of learning. The teachers reviewed and drafted learning goals and strategies. These reflections were collected in the form of annotated ILPs which were analysed for applicability and appropriateness for students in both mainstream and specialist settings. Next, the resulting intervention strategies were piloted with teachers from a mainstream primary school and a specialist setting to further establish the suitability of the proposed teaching strategies for use in the classroom. Ultimately, the aim of this phase of the study was to develop intervention strategies to further teacher understanding of how to teach the skills of thinking.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Assessment Research Centre. (2018). Developmental assessment and reporting for students with additional needs: Getting started. Retrieved from: https://education.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/1331249/Getting_started_with_SWANs.pdf.
Bae, Y. S., Chiang, H., & Hickson, L. (2015). Mathematical word problem solving ability of children with autism spectrum disorder and their typically developing peers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(7), 2200–2208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2387-8.
Coles-Janess, B., & Griffin, P. (2009). Mapping transitions in interpersonal learning for students with additional needs. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajse.33.2.141.
Csapó, B., Ainley, J., Bennett, R. E., Latour, T., & Law, N. (2012). Technological issues for computer- based assessment. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 143–230). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_4.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Policy frameworks for new assessments. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 301–339). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_6.
De Vroey, A., Struyf, E., & Petry, K. (2016). Secondary schools included: A literature review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(2), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1075609.
Delinda, V. G. (2006). Spatial visualization, visual imagery, and mathematical problem solving of students with varying abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(6), 496–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390060201.
Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4–12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959–964. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204529.
Dignath, C., Buettner, & Langfeldt, H. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003.
Douglas, D. D., & Charles, A. H. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871103400104.
Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309334431.
Griffin, P. (1993). Profiles: Assumptions and procedures in their development. Melbourne: Assessment Research Centre, RMIT.
Griffin, P. (2007). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j/stueduc.2007.01.007.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from www.ccsso.org/content/PDFs/FAST%20Learning%20Progressions.pdf.
Hessels, M. G. P., & Hessels-Schlatter, C. (2013). Current views on cognitive education: A critical discussion and future perspectives. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.108, https://doi.org/10.1037/10034-000
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence (A. Parsons & S. Milgram, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. https://doi.org/10.1037/10034-000.
Jung, L., Gomez, C., Baird, S. M., & Keramidas, C. (2008). Designing intervention plans. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.117/004005990804100103.
Korinek, L., & deFur, S. H. (2016). Supporting student self-regulation to access the general education curriculum. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(5), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915626134.
Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Masters, G. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296272.
Petersen, J. (2015). Critical and creative thinking as a general capability in the Australian curriculum: An action agenda for religious education in primary schools. Religious Education Journal of Australia, 31(1), 3–9.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. (M. Cook, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.
Rueda, M. R., Checa, P., & Cómbita, L. M. (2012). Enhanced efficiency of the executive attention network after training in preschool children: Immediate changes and effects after two months. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(Supplement 1), S192–S204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.09.004.
Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, B., & Quellmalz, E. (2012). New assessments and environments for knowledge building. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 231–300). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_5.
Senate Standing Committee on Education and Employment. (2016). Access to real learning: the impact of policy, funding and culture on students with disability. Canberra: Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House.
Smith, J. L. M., Sáez, L., & Doabler, C. T. (2016). Using explicit and systematic instruction to support working memory. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(6), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916650633.
Spencer, V. G., Evmenova, A. S., Boon, R. T., & Hayes-Harris, L. (2014). Review of research-based interventions for students with autism spectrum disorders in content area instruction: Implications and considerations for classroom practice. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(3), 331–353.
Spooner, F., Knight, V. F., Browder, D. M., & Smith, B. R. (2012). Evidence-based practice for teaching academics to students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33(6), 374-387. https://doi.org/10.117/004005990804100103.
Strickland, J., Woods, K., & Pavlovic, M. (2016, 27 Nov–1 Dec). Assessing and understanding early numeracy for students with additional learning needs. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne.
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml.
Victorian Department of Education and Training (2018, May 10). Program for students with disabilities. Retrieved from: http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/learningneeds/Pages/psd.aspx.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). Introduction: Fundamental problems of defectology. (J. E. Knox & C. B. Stevens., Trans.). In W. R. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky Vol. 2: The fundamentals of defectology (Abnormal psychology and learning disabilities) (pp. 29–52).https://doi-org.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/10.1007/978-1-4615-2806-7 (Original work published 1929).
Wilson, M., Gochyyev, P., & Scalise, K. (2016). Assessment of learning in digital interactive social networks: A learning analytics approach. Online Learning, 20(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i2.799.
Woods, K., & Griffin, P. (2013). Judgment-based performance measures of literacy for students with additional needs: Seeing students through the eyes of experienced special education teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.73477.
Zelazo, P. D., Blair, C. B., & Willoughby, M. T. (2016). Executive Function: Implications for Education (NCER 2017–2000). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kamei, T. (2020). Thinking Skills Instructional Strategies: Teaching Students with Additional Needs to be Better Thinkers. In: Griffin, P., Woods, K. (eds) Understanding Students with Additional Needs as Learners. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56596-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56596-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56595-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56596-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)