Abstract
This chapter argues that, although transhumanism depicts itself as following the footsteps of the tradition of humanism, i.e. as seeking for a better world for all human beings, it is realizing ambiguous trajectories. Despite officially proclaimed integrative intentions and goals of some of its most prominent leaders, it seems that transhumanism tends to push forward social innovations that are a double-edged sword. Indeed, we face an era of military rearmament also due to achievements that have emerged in the converging fields of AI, robotics and human enhancement. Some of the most controversial views concerning these achievements and their possible impacts on modern warfare are discussed. Moreover, we outline how these developments in the military sector are symptomatic for a broader technological trend that seems to become a major transformative driver in the twenty-first century—a world where inequality is on the rise both in the social, the technological and the military spheres.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A pathbreaking example, although by now already somewhat outdated, is the humanoid robot BINA48 (first development 2010) by Hanson Robotics: http://www.hansonrobotics.com/robot/bina48/
References
Ackerman, E.: DARPA tests battery-powered exoskeletons on real soldiers. IEEE Spectr. http://spectrum.ieee.org/video/robotics/military-robots/darpa-tests-batterypowered-exoskeletons-on-real-soldiers (2015)
Ackerman, E., Guizzo, E.: The next generation of Boston dynamics’ ATLAS robot is quiet, robust, and tether free. IEEE Spectr. http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/humanoids/next-generation-of-boston-dynamics-atlas-robot (2016)
Barrett, J.L.: Cognitive science, religion and theology. In: Schloss, J., Murray, M. (eds.) The Believing Primate – Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion, pp. 76–99. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)
Benedikter, R., Siepmann, K., Reymann, A.: “Head-transplanting” and “mind-uploading” – Philosophical implications and potential social consequences of two medico-scientific Utopias. Rev. Contemp. Philos. 16, 38–82 (2017). https://doi.org/10.22381/RCP1620172
Boston Dynamics. Changing your idea of what robots can do. http://www.bostondynamics.com/index.html (n.d.)
Bostrom, N.: Technological revolutions – ethics and politics in the dark. In: Cameron, N.M.d.S., Mitchell, M.E. (eds.) Nanoscale: Issues and Perspectives for the Nano Century, pp. 129–152. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley (2006)
Bostrom, N.: Superintelligence – Paths, Dangers. Strategies. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)
Georgia Tech. News center – experts guide: Ron Arkin. http://www.news.gatech.edu/expert/ronald-arkin (n.d.)
Global Future 2045 International Congress. Open letter to UN-Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. 12 March 2013. http://gf2045.com/read/208/ (2013)
Häusler, T.: Roboterforscher Ron Arkin – Wie Kampfroboter den Krieg humaner machen sollen. Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen (SRF) – Gesellschaft & Religion. https://www.srf.ch/kultur/gesellschaft-religion/wie-kampfroboter-den-krieg-humaner-machen-sollen (2017)
Hewitt, J.: DARPA dreams – cortical modems and neural RAMplants for restoring active memory. Extreme Tech. https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/203718-darpa-dreams-cortical-modems-and-neural-ramplants-for-restoring-active-memory (2015)
Israel Aerospace Industries IAI. Harpy NG; iai.co.il. https://www.iai.co.il/p/harpy (n.d.)
Istvan, Z.: The Transhumanist Wager. Self-Published, New York (2013)
Krishnan, A.: Killer Robots – Legality and Ethicality of Autonomous Weapons. Routledge, London (2016)
Odrich, P.: Steuerung per Fernbedienung – Russland entwickelt Roboterversion des Panzers Armata T-14. Ingenieur.de. http://www.ingenieur.de/Branchen/Fahrzeugbau/Russland-entwickelt-Roboterversion-Panzers-Armata-T-14 (2015)
Russell, S., Tegmark, M., Walsh, T.: Why we really should ban autonomous weapons. Kurzweil – Accelerating Intelligence. http://www.kurzweilai.net/why-we-really-should-ban-autonomous-weapons-a-response (2015)
Toscano, C.P.: “Friend of humans” – an argument for developing autonomous weapon systems. J. Natl. Secur. Law Policy. 8(1), 207 (2015)
Wallace, S.: The proposed ban on offensive autonomous weapons is unrealistic and dangerous – so says former U.S. Army Officer and Autonomous Weapons expert Sam Wallace. Kurzweil – Accelerating Intelligence. http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-proposed-ban-on-offensive-autonomous-weapons-is-unrealistic-and-dangerous (2015)
Wellerstein, A.: No one can stop President Trump from using nuclear weapons – That’s by design. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/12/01/no-one-can-stop-president-trump-from-using-nuclear-weapons-thats-by-design/?utm_term=.9d0b95614293 (2016)
Wyss Institute. Soft Exosuits. wyss.harvard.edu, https://wyss.harvard.edu/technology/soft-exosuit/ (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reymann, A., Benedikter, R. (2021). War in Times of “Beyond Man”: Reflections on a “Grand” Contemporary Topic. In: Hofkirchner, W., Kreowski, HJ. (eds) Transhumanism: The Proper Guide to a Posthuman Condition or a Dangerous Idea?. Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56546-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56546-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56545-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56546-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)