Abstract
The institutionalization and international streamlining of what is called ‘peacebuilding’ often obscures our view of what peace actually means for a society affected by different forms of violence and how that peace can be built. This chapter argues for a broader understanding of peacebuilding, not as an outside intervention but something growing from within and as a long-term process directed towards the resolution of structural violence often underlying physical outbreaks of violence. Drawing on long-term ethnographic research in Indonesia, the chapter critically reflects on local peace processes and ensuing resistance movements against broader issues of social injustice. Picking up Ortner’s concept of ‘ethnographic refusal’ (1995), it investigates the various dimensions and strategies of ‘refusal’ in these transformation processes. It looks at refusal of local complexity implied in international peace interventions, but it also examines local peacebuilding and resistance to outside intervention and emerging inequalities based on a strategic refusal of diversity and internal conflict. Analysing the diverging strategies of refusal among different stakeholder groups sheds light on the complex entanglements of cultural essentialization and power politics in mainstream international peacebuilding, grassroots reconciliation and local resistance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam, J. (2009). The problem of going home: Land management, displacement, and reconciliation in Ambon. In B. Bräuchler (Ed.), Reconciling Indonesia: Grassroots agency for peace (pp. 138–154). London and New York: Routledge.
Avruch, K. (1998). Culture and conflict resolution. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bräuchler, B. (2010). The revival dilemma: Reflections on human rights, self-determination and legal pluralism in Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 42(62), 1–42.
Bräuchler, B. (2014). Christian-Muslim relations in post-conflict Ambon, Moluccas: Adat, religion and beyond. In B. Platzdasch & J. Saravanamuttu (Eds.), Religious diversity in Muslim-majority Southeast Asia: Areas of toleration and conflict (pp. 154–172). Singapore: ISEAS.
Bräuchler, B. (2015). The cultural dimension of peace: Decentralization and reconciliation in Indonesia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bräuchler, B. (2017a). Changing patterns of mobility, citizenship and belonging in Indonesia. Social Identities, 23(4), 446–461.
Bräuchler, B. (2017b). Social engineering the local for peace. Social Anthropology, 25(4), 437–453.
Bräuchler, B. (2018a). Contextualizing ethnographic peace research. In G. Millar (Ed.), Ethnographic peace research: Approaches and tensions (pp. 21–42). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bräuchler, B. (2018b). The cultural turn in peace research: Prospects and challenges. Peacebuilding, 6(1), 17–33.
Bräuchler, B. (2018c). Diverging ecologies on Bali. Sojourn, 33(2), 362–396.
Bräuchler, B. (2019a). Brokerage, creativity and space: Protest culture in Indonesia. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 4(40), 451–468.
Bräuchler, B. (2019b). From transitional to performative justice: Peace activism in the aftermath of communal violence. Global Change, Peace & Security, 31(2), 201–220.
Caldwell, I., & Henley, D. (Eds.). (2008). Stranger-kings in Indonesia and beyond (Special issue Indonesia and the Malay world). Centreville, VA: Carfax Publishing.
Couldry, N. (2015). Alternative media and voice. In C. Atton (Ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media (pp. 43–53). New York: Routledge.
Davidson, J. S., & Henley, D. (Eds.). (2007). The revival of tradition in Indonesian politics: The deployment of Adat from colonialism to indigenism. London and New York: Routledge.
Duncan, C. R. (2009). Reconciliation and revitalization: The resurgence of tradition in postconflict Tobelo, North Maluku, Eastern Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Studies, 68(4), 1077–1104.
Faist, T. (2014). Brokerage in cross-border mobility: Social mechanisms and the (re)production of social inequalities. Social Inclusion, 2(4), 38–52.
Fenton, N. (2016). Left out? Digital media, radical politics and social change. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 346–361.
Fox, J. J. (2008). Installing the ‘outsider’ inside. Indonesia and the Malay World, 36(105), 201–218.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(1), 167–191.
Gardner, K., & Lewis, D. (2015). Anthropology and development: Challenges for the twenty-first century. London: Pluto.
Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising power in post-authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hall, S., & Grossberg, L. (1986). On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 45–60.
Humphrey, C. (2012). Inequality. In D. Fassin (Ed.), A companion to moral anthropology (pp. 302–319). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on #Occupy everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Anthropologist, 39(2), 259–279.
Juris, J. S., Ronayne, M., Shokooh-Valle, F., & Wengronowitz, R. (2012). Negotiating power and difference within the 99%. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 434–440.
Kidd, D. (2015). Occupy and social movement communication. In C. Atton (Ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media (pp. 457–468). New York: Routledge.
Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Li, T. M. (2000). Articulating indigenous identity in Indonesia: Resource politics and the tribal slot (Berkeley Workshop on Environmental Politics, Working Paper 7). Berkeley.
Mac Ginty, R. (2014). Everyday peace: Bottom-up and local agency in conflict-affected societies. Security Dialogue, 45(6), 548–564.
Mac Ginty, R. (2015). Where is the local? Critical localism and peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 840–856.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGranahan, C. (2016). Theorizing refusal: An introduction. Cultural Anthropology, 31(3), 319–325.
Merry, S. E. (2006). Transnational human rights and local activism: Mapping the middle. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 38–51.
Millar, G. (Ed.). (2018). Ethnographic peace research: Approaches and tensions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nunn, A. (2016). The production and reproduction of inequality in the UK in times of austerity. British Politics, 11(4), 469–487.
Ortner, S. B. (1995). Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 37(1), 173–193.
Ortner, S. B. (2016). Dark anthropology and its others: Theory since the eighties. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 47–73.
Pande, R. (2017). Strategic essentialism. In D. Richardson et al. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of geography. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg1170.
Platenkamp, J. D. M. (2001, November 21–23). Intercultural conflicts in Indonesia. Paper presented at the symposium on ‘Integrating others: The appropriation of modernity’, Institut für Ethnologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
Putuhena, S., & Wakano, A. (2008). Laporan Penelitian Pemerintahan Negeri dan Kampung di Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat. Ambon.
Richardson, T., & Jensen, O. B. (2009). How mobility systems produce inequality: Making mobile subject types on the Bangkok sky train. Built Environment, 23(2), 218–231.
Richmond, O. P. (2011). A post-liberal peace. London: Routledge.
Richmond, O. P. (2018a). Peace and the formation of political order. International Peacekeeping, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2018.1511374.
Richmond, O. P. (2018b). Rescuing peacebuilding? Anthropology and peace formation. Global Society, 32(2), 221–239.
Sealey, C. (2015). Social exclusion: Re-examining its conceptual relevance to tackling inequality and social injustice. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35(9/10), 600–617.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning, 38, 207–226.
Simpson, A. (2007). On ethnographic refusal: Indigeneity, ‘voice’ and colonial citizenship. Junctures, 9, 67–80.
Speed, S. (2006). At the crossroads of human rights and anthropology: Toward a critically engaged activist research. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 66–76.
Trochimchuk, S. (2011). Cultural negotiations: Examining multiculturalism and the limits of anti-essentialism. Waterloo: Canadian Political Science Association. http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2011/Trochimchuk.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2013.
von Benda-Beckmann, F., & von Benda-Beckmann, K. (2007). Social security between past and future: Introduction. In F.von Benda-Beckmann & K.von Benda-Beckmann (Eds.), Social security between past and future: Ambonese networks of care and support (pp. 1–24). Münster: LIT.
Zahara, A. (2016, August 8). Refusal as research method in discard studies. https://discardstudies.com/2016/03/21/refusal-as-research-method-in-discard-studies/. Accessed 11 June 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bräuchler, B. (2021). Peacebuilding and Resistance: Inequality, Empowerment, Refusal. In: Kustermans, J., Sauer, T., Segaert, B. (eds) A Requiem for Peacebuilding? . Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56477-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56477-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56476-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56477-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)