Skip to main content

Peacebuilding and Resistance: Inequality, Empowerment, Refusal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Requiem for Peacebuilding?

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

Abstract

The institutionalization and international streamlining of what is called ‘peacebuilding’ often obscures our view of what peace actually means for a society affected by different forms of violence and how that peace can be built. This chapter argues for a broader understanding of peacebuilding, not as an outside intervention but something growing from within and as a long-term process directed towards the resolution of structural violence often underlying physical outbreaks of violence. Drawing on long-term ethnographic research in Indonesia, the chapter critically reflects on local peace processes and ensuing resistance movements against broader issues of social injustice. Picking up Ortner’s concept of ‘ethnographic refusal’ (1995), it investigates the various dimensions and strategies of ‘refusal’ in these transformation processes. It looks at refusal of local complexity implied in international peace interventions, but it also examines local peacebuilding and resistance to outside intervention and emerging inequalities based on a strategic refusal of diversity and internal conflict. Analysing the diverging strategies of refusal among different stakeholder groups sheds light on the complex entanglements of cultural essentialization and power politics in mainstream international peacebuilding, grassroots reconciliation and local resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, J. (2009). The problem of going home: Land management, displacement, and reconciliation in Ambon. In B. Bräuchler (Ed.), Reconciling Indonesia: Grassroots agency for peace (pp. 138–154). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K. (1998). Culture and conflict resolution. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuchler, B. (2010). The revival dilemma: Reflections on human rights, self-determination and legal pluralism in Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 42(62), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuchler, B. (2014). Christian-Muslim relations in post-conflict Ambon, Moluccas: Adat, religion and beyond. In B. Platzdasch & J. Saravanamuttu (Eds.), Religious diversity in Muslim-majority Southeast Asia: Areas of toleration and conflict (pp. 154–172). Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuchler, B. (2015). The cultural dimension of peace: Decentralization and reconciliation in Indonesia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuchler, B. (2017a). Changing patterns of mobility, citizenship and belonging in Indonesia. Social Identities, 23(4), 446–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuchler, B. (2017b). Social engineering the local for peace. Social Anthropology, 25(4), 437–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuchler, B. (2018a). Contextualizing ethnographic peace research. In G. Millar (Ed.), Ethnographic peace research: Approaches and tensions (pp. 21–42). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuchler, B. (2018b). The cultural turn in peace research: Prospects and challenges. Peacebuilding, 6(1), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuchler, B. (2018c). Diverging ecologies on Bali. Sojourn, 33(2), 362–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuchler, B. (2019a). Brokerage, creativity and space: Protest culture in Indonesia. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 4(40), 451–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuchler, B. (2019b). From transitional to performative justice: Peace activism in the aftermath of communal violence. Global Change, Peace & Security, 31(2), 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, I., & Henley, D. (Eds.). (2008). Stranger-kings in Indonesia and beyond (Special issue Indonesia and the Malay world). Centreville, VA: Carfax Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. (2015). Alternative media and voice. In C. Atton (Ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media (pp. 43–53). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. S., & Henley, D. (Eds.). (2007). The revival of tradition in Indonesian politics: The deployment of Adat from colonialism to indigenism. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, C. R. (2009). Reconciliation and revitalization: The resurgence of tradition in postconflict Tobelo, North Maluku, Eastern Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Studies, 68(4), 1077–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faist, T. (2014). Brokerage in cross-border mobility: Social mechanisms and the (re)production of social inequalities. Social Inclusion, 2(4), 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, N. (2016). Left out? Digital media, radical politics and social change. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 346–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. J. (2008). Installing the ‘outsider’ inside. Indonesia and the Malay World, 36(105), 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(1), 167–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, K., & Lewis, D. (2015). Anthropology and development: Challenges for the twenty-first century. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising power in post-authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., & Grossberg, L. (1986). On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, C. (2012). Inequality. In D. Fassin (Ed.), A companion to moral anthropology (pp. 302–319). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on #Occupy everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Anthropologist, 39(2), 259–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juris, J. S., Ronayne, M., Shokooh-Valle, F., & Wengronowitz, R. (2012). Negotiating power and difference within the 99%. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 434–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, D. (2015). Occupy and social movement communication. In C. Atton (Ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media (pp. 457–468). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, T. M. (2000). Articulating indigenous identity in Indonesia: Resource politics and the tribal slot (Berkeley Workshop on Environmental Politics, Working Paper 7). Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2014). Everyday peace: Bottom-up and local agency in conflict-affected societies. Security Dialogue, 45(6), 548–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2015). Where is the local? Critical localism and peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 840–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan, C. (2016). Theorizing refusal: An introduction. Cultural Anthropology, 31(3), 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. E. (2006). Transnational human rights and local activism: Mapping the middle. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, G. (Ed.). (2018). Ethnographic peace research: Approaches and tensions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, A. (2016). The production and reproduction of inequality in the UK in times of austerity. British Politics, 11(4), 469–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. B. (1995). Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 37(1), 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. B. (2016). Dark anthropology and its others: Theory since the eighties. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande, R. (2017). Strategic essentialism. In D. Richardson et al. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of geography. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg1170.

  • Platenkamp, J. D. M. (2001, November 21–23). Intercultural conflicts in Indonesia. Paper presented at the symposium on ‘Integrating others: The appropriation of modernity’, Institut für Ethnologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putuhena, S., & Wakano, A. (2008). Laporan Penelitian Pemerintahan Negeri dan Kampung di Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat. Ambon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, T., & Jensen, O. B. (2009). How mobility systems produce inequality: Making mobile subject types on the Bangkok sky train. Built Environment, 23(2), 218–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2011). A post-liberal peace. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2018a). Peace and the formation of political order. International Peacekeeping, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2018.1511374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2018b). Rescuing peacebuilding? Anthropology and peace formation. Global Society, 32(2), 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sealey, C. (2015). Social exclusion: Re-examining its conceptual relevance to tackling inequality and social injustice. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35(9/10), 600–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning, 38, 207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A. (2007). On ethnographic refusal: Indigeneity, ‘voice’ and colonial citizenship. Junctures, 9, 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed, S. (2006). At the crossroads of human rights and anthropology: Toward a critically engaged activist research. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trochimchuk, S. (2011). Cultural negotiations: Examining multiculturalism and the limits of anti-essentialism. Waterloo: Canadian Political Science Association. http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2011/Trochimchuk.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2013.

  • von Benda-Beckmann, F., & von Benda-Beckmann, K. (2007). Social security between past and future: Introduction. In F.von Benda-Beckmann & K.von Benda-Beckmann (Eds.), Social security between past and future: Ambonese networks of care and support (pp. 1–24). Münster: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahara, A. (2016, August 8). Refusal as research method in discard studies. https://discardstudies.com/2016/03/21/refusal-as-research-method-in-discard-studies/. Accessed 11 June 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birgit Bräuchler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bräuchler, B. (2021). Peacebuilding and Resistance: Inequality, Empowerment, Refusal. In: Kustermans, J., Sauer, T., Segaert, B. (eds) A Requiem for Peacebuilding? . Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56477-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics