Abstract
Drawing on a case study of peacebuilding the District of Aguablanca in Colombia, Aura Liliana López López and Bert Ingelaere introduce the concept of localized peace trajectories and endogenous knowledge in order to overcome some of the oft-noted problems with liberal, and also ‘hybrid’, peacebuilding. They show how, in Aguablanca, endogenous peace infrastructures have their foundations in everyday responses to violent conflict and how these infrastructures strengthen collaboration amongst various actors, both inside and outside the community. Their findings, they argue, should help liberal agents to incorporate local peacemaking knowledge, trajectories and infrastructures into the ways of doing sustainable peacebuilding. Whereas in peacebuilding the approach to the local is an ‘invitation’ to participate in dialogue for policy-making and other purposes; in the search for hybrid and inclusive peace infrastructures, the trajectory analysis supposes an inquiry guided by the need to depart from what already exists, in search for avenues of collaboration between state and civic actors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcaldía de Cali. (2017). Análisis económico del sector.
Alejandro Leal, P. (2007). Participation: The ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo-liberal era. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 539–548.
Alto Comisionado para la Paz. (2016). Summary of Colombia’s agreement to end the conflict and build peace. http://www.altocomisionadoparalapaz.gov.co/herramientas/Documents/summary-of-colombias-peace-agreement.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2020.
Álvarez, E., Llorente, M. V., Cajiao, A., & Garzón, J. C. (2017). Crimen organizado y saboteadores armados en tiempos de transición (No. 27; Serie Informes, p. 133). Fundación Ideas para la Paz. http://cdn.ideaspaz.org/media/website/document/59c3dc1155e69.pdf.
Autesserre, S. (2010). The trouble with the Congo: Local violence and the failure of international peacebuilding (Vol. 115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berríos Díaz, G. (2011). La ley de responsabilidad penal del adolescente como sistema de justicia: Análisis y propuestas. Política Criminal, 6(11), 163–191. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992011000100006.
Bicker, A., Pottier, J., & Sillitoe, P. (2003). Participating in development: Approaches to indigenous knowledge. London and New York: Routledge.
Brenner, N., Jessop, B., Jones, M., & Macleod, G. (2008). State/space: A reader. New York: Wiley.
Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969.
Cohen, J. M., & Uphoff, N. T. (1980). Participation’s place in rural development: Seeking clarity through specificity. World Development, 8(3), 213–235.
Crossman, P., & Devisch, R. (2002). Endogenous knowledge in anthropological perspective. Indigenous Knowledge and the Integration of Knowledge Systems: Towards a Philosophy of Articulation, 96–125.
Debiel, T., Glassner, R., Schetter, C., & Terlinden, U. (2009). Local state-building in Afghanistan and Somaliland. Peace Review, 21(1), 38–44.
Gilbert, A. (1997). Small voices against the wind: Local knowledge and social transformation. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 3(3), 275.
Giraldo, F. U., & Cruz, F. M. (1999). Dinámica del poblamiento y algunas características de los asentamientos populares con población afrocolombiana en el oriente de Cali. Ponencia Presentada En El Observatorio Socio-Político y Cultural Desplazados, Migraciones Internas y Reestructuraciones Territoriales, Bogotá, CES-Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, 5–7.
Heron, J., & Reason, P. (1997). A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 274–294.
Lasso Toro, P. (2013). Cuando se vive el desarraigo. Educación y desplazamiento forzado: Una mirada desde el Distrito de Aguablanca, Cali, Colombia. Revista Científica Guillermo de Ockham, 11(2), 35–51.
Leonardsson, H., & Rudd, G. (2015). The ‘local turn’in peacebuilding: A literature review of effective and emancipatory local peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 825–839.
López, A. (2015). Justicia restaurativa y procesos restaurativos. Modelo Pedagógico de las Casas de Restauración Juvenil Francisco Esperanza de la Fundación Paz y Bien en el Distrito de Aguablanca, Cali, Colombia. Organización Internacional para las Migraciones.
Mac Ginty, R. (2010). Hybrid peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace. Security Dialogue, 41(4), 391–412.
Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International peacebuilding and local resistance: Hybrid forms of peace. Berlin: Springer.
Mac Ginty, R. (2014). Everyday peace: Bottom-up and local agency in conflict-affected societies. Security Dialogue, 45(6), 548–564.
Mac Ginty, R. (2015). Where is the local? Critical localism and peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 840–856.
Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2013). The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 763–783.
Maschi, T., Leibowitz, G., & Mizus, L. (2014). Restorative justice. In L. Cousins (Ed.), Encyclopedia for human services and diversity (pp. 1142–1144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Michaud, K. E. H., Carlisle, J. E., & Smith, E. R. A. N. (2009). The relationship between cultural values and political ideology, and the role of political knowledge. Political Psychology, 30(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00679.x.
Mosse, D. (2001). “People’s knowledge”, participation and patronage: Operations and representations in rural development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 16–35). London: ZedBooks.
Newman, J., Barnes, M., Sullivan, H., & Knops, A. (2004). Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy, 33(2), 203–223.
Paffenholz, T. (2010). Civil society & peacebuilding: A critical assessment. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Paffenholz, T. (2015). Unpacking the local turn in peacebuilding: A critical assessment towards an agenda for future research. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 857–874.
Powell, M. (2006). Which knowledge? Whose reality? An overview of knowledge used in the development sector. Development in Practice, 16(6), 518–532.
Prieto, C. A. (n.d.). Bandas criminales en Colombia: ¿amenaza a la seguridad regional? 12, 25.
Pugh, M., Cooper, N., & Turner, M. (2016). Whose peace? Critical perspectives on the political economy of peacebuilding. New York: Springer.
Raeymaekers, T. (2013). Post-war conflict and the market for protection: The challenges to Congo’s hybrid peace. International Peacekeeping, 20(5), 600–617.
Richmond, O. P. (2009). Becoming liberal, unbecoming liberalism: Liberal-local hybridity via the everyday as a response to the paradoxes of liberal peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 3(3), 324–344.
Richmond, O. P. (2010). Palgrave advances in peacebuilding: Critical developments and approaches. Basingstoke: Springer.
Richmond, O. P. (2013). Failed statebuilding versus peace formation. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(3), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713482816.
Richmond, O. P. (2015). The dilemmas of a hybrid peace: Negative or positive? Cooperation and Conflict, 50(1), 50–68.
Richmond, O. P. (2016). Peace formation and political order in conflict affected societies. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190237639.001.0001/acprof-9780190237639.
Rist, S., Boillat, S., Gerritsen, P. R., Schneider, F., Mathez-Stiefel, S.-L., & Tapia, N. (2011). Endogenous knowledge: Implications for sustainable development. In U. Wiesmann & H. Hurni (Eds.), Research for sustainable development: Foundations, experiences, and perspectives (pp. 119–146). Perspectives of the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South, University of Bern (Vol. 6). Bern, Switzerland: Geographica Bernensia.
Salas Salazar, L. G. (2015). Lógicas territoriales y relaciones de poder en el espacio de los actores armados: Un aporte desde la geografía política al estudio de la violencia y el conflicto armado en Colombia, 1990–2012. Cuadernos de Geografía-Revista Colombiana de Geografía, 24(1), 157–172.
Scott, J. C. (1989). Everyday forms of resistance. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 4(1), 33.
Selimovic, J. M. (2018). Everyday agency and transformation: Place, body and story in the divided city. Cooperation and Conflict, 54(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836718807510.
Sillitoe, P. (1998). The development of indigenous knowledge: A new applied anthropology. Current Anthropology, 39(2), 223–252.
Somesh, K. (2002). Methods for community participation: A complete guide for practitioners. In S. Kumar (Ed.), Methods for community participation: A complete guide for practitioners. New Delhi: Vistaar Publications.
Tsing, A. L. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection (STU-Student edition). Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7s1xk.
Wallis, J. (2012). A liberal-local hybrid peace project in action? The increasing engagement between the local and liberal in Timor-Leste. Review of International Studies, 38(4), 735–761.
Williams, P. (2013). Reproducing everyday peace in north India: Process, politics, and power. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(1), 230–250.
Wiuff Moe, L. (2011). Hybrid and ‘everyday’ political ordering: Constructing and contesting legitimacy in Somaliland. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 43(63), 143–177.
Zaum, D. (2012). Beyond the “liberal peace”. Global Governance, 18(1), 121–132.
Acknowledgements
This chapter was prepared with the financial support of the Institute of Development Policy (IOB), University of Antwerp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
López López, A.L., Ingelaere, B. (2021). The Missing Link in Hybrid Peacebuilding: Localized Peace Trajectories and Endogenous Knowledge. In: Kustermans, J., Sauer, T., Segaert, B. (eds) A Requiem for Peacebuilding? . Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56477-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56477-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56476-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56477-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)