Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable Production of Forest-Risk Commodities: Governance and Disarticulations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Consumption and Production, Volume I

Abstract

Increased awareness of ‘telecouplings’ between distant producer and consumer systems, through new forms of information exchange, has led to changes in how production systems are governed in relation to sustainability, including through private-sector led and hybrid governance initiatives. This chapter examines the complexities of implementing private-sector-led ‘zero-deforestation’ commitments, which promise to eliminate deforestation from the supply chains of the commodities that companies produce, trade, and/or source. Using the concept of ‘disarticulations,’ this chapter brings an analysis of global production networks into conversation with critical political economy’s emphasis on discourse and knowledge production. We discuss dominant, mainstream discourses prevalent in zero-deforestation governance, including notions that: (i) Implementing zero-deforestation is highly technical and requires the expertise of consultants and third parties; (ii) All supply chain actors have responsibility for zero-deforestation; (iii) The need for data and technologies for governing deforestation; (iv) Jurisdictional approaches provide joined up governance for zero-deforestation. Examining these discourses helps us to understand some of the complexities in the implementation of ‘zero-deforestation’ commitments, how socio-economic processes in global production are linked or delinked, and how people can be connected to or excluded from these chains. Finally, we reflect on opportunities for research and practice in shifting toward sustainable production and consumption of deforestation-risk commodities, and the importance of considering how power relations and knowledge politics shape production networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrawal, A. (2005). Technologies of government and the making of subjects. London: Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. (2011). Topological twists: Power’s shifting geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography, 1(3), 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bair, J., Berndt, C., Boeckler, M., & Werner, M. (2013). Dis/articulating producers, markets, and regions: New directions in critical studies of commodity chains. Environment and Planning A, 45(11), 2544–2552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bair, J., & Werner, M. (2011). Commodity chains and the uneven geographies of global capitalism: A disarticulations perspective. Environment and Planning A, 43, 988–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L. (2014). Governance in the age of global markets: Challenges, limits, and consequences. Agriculture and Human Values, 31(3), 513–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, S. R., Belton, B., Hall, D., Vandergeest, P., Murray, F. J., Ponte, S., et al. (2013). Certify sustainable aquaculture? Science, 341(6150), 1067–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butt, N., Lambrick, F., Menton, M., & Renwick, A. (2019). The supply chain of violence. Nature Sustainability, 2(8), 742–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, L. R., Larrosa, C., Milner-Gulland, E. J., & Edwards, D. P. (2014). A double-edged sword for tropical forests. Science, 346(6205), 38–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, N. M., & Yeung, H. W. C. (2015). Global production networks: Theorizing economic development in an interconnected world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauvergne, P., & Lister, J. (2012). Big brand sustainability: Governance prospects and environmental limits. Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delabre, I., Alexander, A., & Rodrigues, C. (2019). Strategies for tropical forest protection and sustainable supply chains: Challenges and opportunities for alignment with the UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00747-z. Accessed 1 November 2019.

  • Delabre, I., & Okereke, C. (2019). Palm oil, power, and participation: The political ecology of social impact assessment. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619882013. Accessed 30 November 2019.

  • Donofrio, B., Rothrock, P. & Leonard, J. (2017). Supply-change: Tracking corporate commitments to deforestation-free supply chains, Forest Trends. https://www.forest-trends.org/publications/supply-change-tracking-corporate-commitments-to-deforestation-free-supply-chains-2017/. Accessed 30 November 2019.

  • Dou, Y., da Silva, R. F. B., Yang, H., & Liu, J. (2018). Spillover effect offsets the conservation effort in the Amazon. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(11), 1715–1732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S., Pagiola, S., & Wunder, S. (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 663–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faier, L. (2011). Fungi, trees, people, nematodes, beetles, and weather: Ecologies of vulnerability and ecologies of negotiation in matsutake commodity exchange. Environment and Planning A, 43, 1079–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, L. H. (2003). Challenging global environmental governance: Social movement agency and global civil society. Global Environmental Politics, 3(2), 120–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francisco, K., & Swanson, D. (2018). The supply chain has no clothes: Technology adoption of blockchain for supply chain transparency. Logistics, 2(1), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallemore, C. (2016). Land and Biodiversity Conservation. In N. Sawki (Ed.), International norms, normative change, and the UN sustainable development goals (pp. 59–82). Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallemore, C., & Jespersen, K. (2016). Transnational markets for sustainable development governance: The case of REDD+. World Development, 86, 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallemore, C., & Jespersen, K. (2019). Offsetting, insetting, or both? current trends in sustainable palm oil certification. Sustainability, 11(19), 5393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallemore, C., Guisinger, A., Kruuse, M., Ruysschaert, D., & Jespersen, K. (2018). Escaping the “teenage” years: The politics of rigor and the evolution of private environmental standards. Ecological Economics, 152, 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R. D., Levy, S., Carlson, K. M., Gardner, T. A., Godar, J., Clapp, J., et al. (2019). Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments. Global Environmental Change, 54, 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebara, M., & Agrawal, A. (2017). Beyond rewards and punishments in the Brazilian Amazon: Practical implications of the REDD+ discourse. Forests, 8(3), 66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. E. (2014). The afterlives of degraded tropical forests: New value for conservation and development. Environment and Society, 5(1), 124–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. E., & Yates, J. S. (2017). Introduction: Rendering land investable. Geoforum, 82, 209–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassini, P., Eskridge, K. M., & Cassman, K. G. (2013). Distinguishing between yield advances and yield plateaus in historical crop production trends. Nature Communications, 4, 2918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (2008). Transparency under scrutiny: Information disclosure in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havice, E., & Campling, L. (2013). Articulating upgrading: Island developing states and canned tuna production. Environment and Planning A, 45(11), 2610–2627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, T. K., & Wallerstein, I. (1977). Patterns of development of the modern world-system. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 1(2), 111–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, K., & Gallemore, C. (2018). The institutional work of payments for ecosystem services: Why the mundane should matter. Ecological Economics, 146, 507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, E. F., & Thorlakson, T. (2018). Sustainability standards: Interactions between private actors, civil society, and governments. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 369–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, E. F., Gibbs, H. K., Heilmayr, R., Carlson, K. M., Fleck, L. C., Garrett, R. D., et al. (2018). The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation. Nature Climate Change, 8(2), 109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance, W. F. (1999). Reflections on the tropical deforestation crisis. Biological Conservation, 91(2–3), 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., Foran, B., Lobefaro, L., & Geschke, A. (2012). International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature, 486(7401), 109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T. M. (2014). What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39(4), 589–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T. M. (2018). After the land grab: Infrastructural violence and the “Mafia System” in Indonesia’s oil palm plantation zones. Geoforum, 96, 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Hull, V., Batistella, M., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Fu, F., et al. (2013). Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons-White, J., & Knight, A. T. (2018). Palm oil supply chain complexity impedes implementation of corporate no-deforestation commitments. Global Environmental Change, 50, 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin-Burgos, V., Clancy, J. S., & Lovett, J. C. (2015). Contesting legitimacy of voluntary sustainability certification schemes: Valuation languages and power asymmetries in the roundtable on sustainable palm oil in Colombia. Ecological Economics, 117, 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, F., & Gereffi, G. (2010). Regulation and economic globalization: Prospects and limits of private governance. Business and Politics, 12(3), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, S. (2018). Dis/articulations and the interrogation of development in GPN research. Progress in Human Geography, 42(4), 509–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mighty Earth (2019). Mighty earth’s rapid response monitoring system. Webinar. http://www.mightyearth.org/rapidresponse/. Accessed 14 October 2019.

  • Moore, J. W. (2010). Madeira, sugar, and the conquest of nature in the “first” sixteenth century, part ii: From regional crisis to commodity frontier, 1506–1530. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 33(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad, D., McGrath, D., Stickler, C., Alencar, A., Azevedo, A., Swette, B., et al. (2014). Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science, 344(6188), 1118–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesadurai, H. E. (2013). Food security, the palm oil–land conflict nexus, and sustainability: A governance role for a private multi-stakeholder regime like the RSPO? The Pacific Review, 26(5), 505–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, P., & Benzeev, R. (2018). The role of zero-deforestation commitments in protecting and enhancing rural livelihoods. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 32, 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, G. (2019). Monitoring deforestation: The use and misuse of satellite technology. https://www.eco-business.com/opinion/monitoring-deforestation-the-use-and-misuse-of-satellite-technology/. Accessed 14 October 2019.

  • North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R., Robbins, P., & Watts, M. (2010). Global nature. In R. Peet, P. Robbins, & M. Watts (Eds.), Global political ecology (pp. 15–62). Oxon: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pendrill, F., Persson, U. M., Godar, J., & Kastner, T. (2019). Deforestation displaced: Trade in forest-risk commodities and the prospects for a global forest transition. Environmental Research Letters, 14(5), 055003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, S., (2019). Business, power and sustainability in a world of global value chains. London, UK: Zed Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ros-Tonen, M. A., Reed, J., & Sunderland, T. (2018). From synergy to complexity: The trend toward integrated value chain and landscape governance. Environmental Management, 62(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • RSPO. (2018). Principles and criteria for the production of sustainable palm oil. https://rspo.org/principles-and-criteria-review. Accessed 30 November 2019.

  • Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J. L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., et al. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(21), 8349–8356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, G., & Glasbergen, P. (2011). Creating legitimacy in global private governance: The case of the roundtable on sustainable palm oil. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1891–1899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, B. (2019). Poverty chains and global capitalism. Competition & Change, 23(1), 71–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, S. (2013). Banking nature? The spectacular financialisation of environmental conservation. Antipode, 45(1), 198–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderlin, W. D., Angelsen, A., Belcher, B., Burgers, P., Nasi, R., Santoso, L., et al. (2005). Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: An overview. World Development, 33(9), 1383–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. (2003). Natural resources and capitalist frontiers. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(48), 5100–5106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. (2009). Supply chains and the human condition. Rethinking Marxism, 21(2), 148–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. K., & Partzsch, L. (2018). Barking up the right tree? NGOs and corporate power for deforestation-free supply chains. Sustainability, 10(11), 3869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M. (2011). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resource Institute. (2018a). By the numbers: The value of tropical forests in the climate change equation. Available https://www.wri.org/blog/2018/10/numbers-value-tropical-forests-climate-change-equation. Accessed 12 October 2019.

  • World Resources Institute. (2018b). 2017 Was the second-worst year on record for tropical tree cover loss. Available https://www.wri.org/blog/2018/06/2017-was-second-worst-year-record-tropical-tree-cover-loss. Accessed 14 October 2019.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editors of this volume, Ranjula Bali Swain and Susanne Sweet, for their insightful comments on an earlier draft. We are also very grateful to Per Strömberg and Örjan Sjöberg for their valuable reflections and constructive comments at the International Sustainable Consumption and Production Workshop 15–16 October 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sussex Business School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

    Izabela Delabre & Anthony Alexander

  2. School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK

    Callum Nolan

  3. Department of Management, Society and Communication, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark

    Kristjan Jespersen

  4. International Affairs Program, International Affairs Program, Easton, PA, USA

    Caleb Gallemore

Authors
  1. Izabela Delabre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Callum Nolan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristjan Jespersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Caleb Gallemore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anthony Alexander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Izabela Delabre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Sustainability Research, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden

    Ranjula Bali Swain

  2. Center for Sustainability Research, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden

    Susanne Sweet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Delabre, I., Nolan, C., Jespersen, K., Gallemore, C., Alexander, A. (2021). Sustainable Production of Forest-Risk Commodities: Governance and Disarticulations. In: Bali Swain, R., Sweet, S. (eds) Sustainable Consumption and Production, Volume I. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56371-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56371-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56370-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56371-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation