Skip to main content

The Catholic Opposition to Gender and Sexual Equality in France: Reviving the Traditional Condemnation of Homosexuality During the Debates on Marriage for All?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Public Discourses About Homosexuality and Religion in Europe and Beyond
  • 603 Accesses

Abstract

In France, the passing of the Marriage for All Act (2012–13) gave rise to the expression of and confrontation between radically divergent stances. Among the opponents to the bill, Catholics (some bishops and lay activists) appeared indeed as key players, for they considered the bill a threat to the family. Above all, they put forward the argument of rights—children’s rights in particular—articulating them with the idea of equality. By doing so, they adopted a secular rhetoric. How can this reorientation in language be analyzed? Does it reflect profound changes or merely constitute a reformulation of the traditional condemnation of homosexuality? Is it a simple tactic or a real inflection in the relationship to homosexuality? This chapter aims to provide answers to these questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Such mobilization is not unique since that kind of anti-gender campaign has been spreading across Europe (Kuhar and Paternotte 2017).

  2. 2.

    Bruno Perreau notes how “the idea of the propagation of homosexuality. .. functions on many layers of discourse: contamination (which combines mental pathology and physiological illness), corruption (the destruction of the natural order through pagan practices), loss of distinctions (androgyny and transsexuality), and conversion (indoctrination into an activist movement not dissimilar from a religious conversion)” Perreau (2016, 10).

  3. 3.

    The term “Demo for All” refers both to the demonstrations against marriage for all and the collective that instigated and organized the marches. The sweatshirts, as well as the balloons, flags, and banners waved by the demonstrators, were pink and blue, the colors of the layettes traditionally given to little girls and to little boys, respectively. The aim was to symbolically mark the commitment of these anti-gender activists to differentiation of the sexes, which they considered threatened by gay and lesbian couples being allowed to marry and adopt.

  4. 4.

    The expression is actually not stated as such in the text, which merely mentions a “solemn legal framework to establish the relationship in time.”

  5. 5.

    The Confédération nationale des Associations familiales catholiques (National Confederation of Catholic Family Associations) and the Familles de France (Families of France) share the same features but are nondenominational. The CLER Amour et Famille, a Catholic association that offers marriage counseling, was also represented.

  6. 6.

    Such was the case with Alliance Vita, which was a perpetuation, under a new name, of the Alliance pour les droits de la vie (Alliance for the Rights to Life).

  7. 7.

    “Le Pacte civil de solidarité (Pacs): Une loi inutile et dangereuse.”

  8. 8.

    Pope John Paul II spoke along the same lines in September 1998 when addressing European Catholic jurists, denouncing homosexual unions, and again before the Roman Rota in January 1999.

  9. 9.

    Isambert (1976) distinguished between external (or functional) secularization and internal secularization. The former refers to the decline of religion in certain sectors of social life. The latter is internal to religious worlds. It refers to the alignment of religious discourses and practices with secular ones.

  10. 10.

    The text was written by six bishops, one priest, and five lay people, including a law professor (Françoise Dekeuwer-Defossez) and a psychoanalyst (Jacques Arènes). Although known as Catholics, the latter pretended to speak as professionals on that occasion.

  11. 11.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKEFnImg-nc.

  12. 12.

    Press release dated December 12, 2012 from Patrick Sanguinetti and Elisabeth Saint-Guily, co-sponsors of David et Jonathan, http://www.france.qrd.org/spip.php?article5575.

  13. 13.

    http://www.petitionpublique.fr/?pi=P2012N33833.

  14. 14.

    http://fhedles.fr/textes-en-ligne/ouverture-du-mariage-declaration-de-fhedles-pour-louverture-dun-debat-dans-les-eglises.

  15. 15.

    The signatories were also Protestants, and it is believed that the petition had the same goal of questioning the appearance of unanimity on the issue among Protestant circles.

  16. 16.

    https://www.davidetjonathan.com/2013/01/08/communique-a-propos-du-mariage-pour-tous.

  17. 17.

    https://eglise.catholique.fr/conference-des-eveques-de-france/textes-et-declarations/365765-poursuivons-le-dialogue.

  18. 18.

    Published, among others, on http://www.sconews.co.uk/opinion/40818/synod-on-the-family-full-text-of-relatio-post-disceptationem.

References

  • Béraud, Céline. 2013. “8—Les catholiques contre le genre: L’Épisode des manuels de SVT.” In Normes religieuses et genre, edited by Florence Rochefort and Maria-Eleonora Sanna, 109–22. Recherches. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. “Un front commun des religions contre le mariage pour tous?” Contemporary French Civilization 39 (3): 335–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. “De la reconnaissance à la mise en forme rituelle des unions de même sexe en France: Enquête auprès de catholiques gays et lesbiennes.” Papeles del CEIC 2 paper 158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/pceic.16294.

  • Béraud, Céline, and Philippe Portier. 2015. Métamorphoses catholiques: acteurs, enjeux et mobilisation depuis le mariage pour tous. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bertinotti, Dominique. 2012. “Mariage homosexuel: ‘une étape vers l’égalité des droits.’” Le Monde, November 7. https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2012/11/07/mariage-homosexuel-il-est-peu-probable-qu-il-y-ait-un-retour-en-arriere_1787277_3224.html.

  • Besson, Claude. 2012. Homosexuels catholiques: Sortir de l’impasse. Paris: Éditions de l’Atelier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buisson-Fenet, Hélène. 2004. Un sexe problématique: l’Église et l’homosexualité masculine en France, 1971–2000. Saint-Denis: Presses universitaires de Vincennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnac, Romain. 2019. “La question de la démocratie dans le discours catholique sur le genre en France.” In Les autorités religieuses face aux questions de genre: Reconfigurations contemporaines des mondes confessionnels autour des nouvelles questions sexuelles, edited by Romain Carnac, Diletta Guidi, and Guillaume Roucoux, 133–50. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chateauraynaud, Francis et Didier Torny. 1999. Les sombres précurseurs: une sociologie pragmatique de l’alerte et du risque. Paris: Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clanché, Phlippe. 2014. Mariage pour tous, divorce chez les cathos. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDF (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith). 1975. Persona Humana: Declaration on Certain Questions Concerning Sexual Ethics. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19751229_persona-humana_en.html.

  • ———. 2003. Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions Between Homosexual Persons. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20030731_homosexual-unions_en.html.

  • ———. 2004. Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Collaboration of Men and Women in the Church and in the World. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20040731_collaboration_en.html.

  • Conseil épiscopal Famille et Société, 2012. “Elargir le mariage aux personnes de même sexe. Ouvrons le débat!” https://ec.cef.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2014/05/texte_conseil_famille_societe_cef4.pdf.

  • Dobbelaere, Karel, and Alfonso Perez-Agote, eds. 2015. The Intimate: Polity and the Catholic Church: Laws about Life, Death and the Family in So-called Catholic Countries. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Éric. 2001. “La voix de l’expertise et les silences de la science dans le débat démocratique.” In Au-delà du PaCS, edited by Daniel Borrillo and Éric Fassin, 87–110. Politique d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, Pope. 2016. Post-synodal Apostolic Exhoration Amoris Laetitia of the Holy Father to Bishops, Priests and Deacons Consecrated Persons Christian Married Couples and All the Lay Faithful on Love in the Family. http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20160319_amoris-laetitia.html.

  • Gay, Jean-Pascal. 2012. “Mariage gay et hiérarchie catholique: un problème d’humanité et de théologie.” L’Obs—Le Plus, November 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, Paula Pinto, Emmanuelle Lucas, and Ysis Percq. 2019. “Familles si diverses, cinq portraits: ‘Nous sommes une famille très classique’: Marianne, Catherine et leur fille à Briare dans le Loiret.” La Croix, July 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvernement français. 2017. Faire progresser l’égalité des droits: Le mariage pour tous: Contenu publié sous la présidence de François Hollande du 15 mai 2012 au 15 mai 2017. https://www.gouvernement.fr/action/le-mariage-pour-tous.

  • Hervieu-Léger, Danièle. 2003. Catholicisme, la fin d’un monde. Paris: Bayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isambert, François-André. 1976. “La sécularisation interne du christianisme.” Revue française de sociologie 17 (4): 573–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelen, Ted G. 2011. “Catholicism, Homosexuality, and Same-Sex Marriage in the United States.” In Faith, Politics, and Sexual Diversity in Canada and the United States, edited by David Rayside and Clyde Wilcox, 207–18. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Paul II, Pope. 1992. Catechism of the Catholic Church. http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM.

  • Kuhar, Roman, and David Paternotte, eds. 2017. Anti-gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing Against Equality. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Borie, Guillemette de. 2015. “La place des personnes homosexuelles dans l’Eglise.” Pélerin, 6928, September 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreau, Bruno. 2016. Queer Theory: The French Response. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raison Du Cleuziou, Yann. 2019. Une contre-révolution catholique: aux origines de La Manif pour tous. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rétif, Sophie. 2017. “Défendre la famille et représenter les familles: L’Engagement au sein des Associations familiales catholiques.” In Catholicisme et identité: Regards croisés sur le catholicisme français contemporain (1980–2017), edited by Bruno Dumons and Frederic Gugelot, 155–70. Paris: Karthala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robcis, Camille. 2013. The Law of Kinship: Anthropology, Psychoanalysis, and the Family in France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robcis, Camille. 2016. La loi de la parenté: la famille, les experts et la République. Paris: Éditions Fahrenheit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stambolis-Ruhstorfer, Michael, and Josselin Tricou. 2017. “Resisting ‘Gender Theory’ in France: A Fulcrum to Religious Action in Secular Society.” In Anti-gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality, edited by David Paternotte and Roman Kuhar, 56–68. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubira, Christine. 2012. “Le mariage pour tous répond à une exigence d’égalité.” La Croix, September 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vingt-Trois, André. 2012. “Texte de la prière du 15 août.” La Vie, August 14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Béraud, C. (2020). The Catholic Opposition to Gender and Sexual Equality in France: Reviving the Traditional Condemnation of Homosexuality During the Debates on Marriage for All?. In: Derks, M., van den Berg, M. (eds) Public Discourses About Homosexuality and Religion in Europe and Beyond. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56326-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics