Skip to main content

Application of the Modigliani–Miller Theory, Modified for the Case of Advance Payments of Tax on Profit, in Rating Methodologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ratings

Abstract

Recently, we have modified the theory of Nobel Prize winners Modigliani and Miller (MM theory), which is a perpetuity limit case of the general theory of capital cost and capital structure—Brusov–Filatova–Orekhova theory, into two ways: we apply it for rating methodologies needs and later we generalized it for the case of advance payments of tax on profit, which is widely used in practice (MMM theory). In this chapter, we use the modified Modigliani–Miller theory (MMM theory) and apply it for rating methodologies needs. The financial “ratios” (main rating parameters) were introduced into MMM theory. The dependence of the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), which plays the role of discount rate in financial flows discounting in rating methodologies, on coverage and leverage ratios is analyzed. Obtained results will help improve the existing rating methodologies. During the last couple of years, we have suggested a new approach to rating methodology of non-financial issuers, as well for project rating (for long-term projects as well as for projects of arbitrary duration) (Brusov et al. 2018, Ratings of the investment projects of arbitrary durations: new methodology. J Rev Global Econ 8:437–448, 2019, Modification of the Modigliani–Miller theory for the case of advance payments of tax on profit. J Rev Global Econ 9:257–268, 2020). The key factors of a new approach are: (1) the adequate use of discounting of financial flows virtually not used in existing rating methodologies and (2) the incorporation of rating parameters (financial “ratios”) into the modern theory of capital structure (Brusov–Filatova–Orekhova (BFO) theory) and into its perpetuity limit.

Recently, we have generalized the Modigliani and Miller theory for a more realistic method of payments of tax on profit payments: for the case of advance payments of tax on profit, which is widely used in practice. Modigliani–Miller theory considers these tax payments as annuity-immediate, while in practice these payments are made in advance and thus should be considered as annuity-due. We have shown that this generalization leads to some important consequences, which change seriously all the main statements by Modigliani and Miller.

In this chapter, we use the modified Modigliani–Miller theory (MMM theory) and apply it for rating methodologies needs. A serious modification of MMM theory in order to use it in rating procedure is required. The financial “ratios” (main rating parameters) were introduced into MMM theory. The necessity of an appropriate use of financial flows discounting in rating methodologies is discussed. The dependence of the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), which plays the role of discount rate, on coverage and leverage ratios is analyzed.

Obtained results make it possible to use the power of this theory in the rating and create a new basis for rating methodologies; in other words, this allows us to develop a new approach to methodology of rating, requiring a serious modification of existing rating methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brusov P (2018a) Editorial: introduction on special issue on the Banking System and financial markets of Russia and other countries: problems and prospects. J Rev Global Econ 7:i–vi. SCOPUS

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusov P (2018b) Editorial. J Rev Global Econ 7:i–v. SCOPUS

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusov PN, Filatova ТV (2011b) From Modigliani–Miller to general theory of capital cost and capital structure of the company. Finance Credit 435:2–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusov PN, Filatova TV, Orekhova NP (2018d) Modern corporate finance and investments, monograph. Knorus Publishing House, Moscow, 517 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N, Brusova A (2011a) Weighted average cost of capital in the theory of Modigliani–Miller, modified for a finite life–time company. Appl Financ Econ 21(11):815–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N et al (2011b) From Modigliani–Miller to general theory of capital cost and capital structure of the company. Res J Econ Bus ICT 2:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N et al (2011c) Influence of debt financing on the effectiveness of the investment project within the Modigliani–Miller theory. Res J Econ Bus ICT (UK) 2:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusov P, Filatova T, Eskindarov M, Orehova N (2012a) Influence of debt financing on the effectiveness of the finite duration investment project. Appl Financ Econ 22(13):1043–1052

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusov P, Filatova T, Eskindarov M, Orehova N (2012b) Hidden global causes of the global financial crisis. J Rev Global Econ 1:106–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusov P, Filatova P, Orekhova N (2013a) Absence of an optimal capital structure in the famous tradeoff theory! J Rev Global Econ 2:94–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N (2013b) A qualitatively new effect in corporative finance: abnormal dependence of cost of equity of company on leverage. J Rev Global Econ 2:183–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusov P, Filatova P, Orekhova N (2014a) Mechanism of formation of the company optimal capital structure, different from suggested by trade off theory. Cogent Econ Finance 2:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2014.946150

  • Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N (2014b) Inflation in Brusov–Filatova–Orekhova theory and in its perpetuity limit—Modigliani–Miller theory. J Rev Global Econ 3:175–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusov P, Filatova T, Orekhova N, Eskindarov M (2015) Modern corporate finance, investments and taxation. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 373 p. monograph. SCOPUS. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319147314

  • Brusov P, Filatova T, Orekhova N, Eskindarov M (2018c) Modern corporate finance, investments, taxation and ratings. Springer Nature Publishing, Switzerland, 571 p. monograph

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusov PN, Filatova TV, Orekhova NP, Kulik VL (2018e) Rating: new approach. J Rev Global Econ 7:37–62. SCOPUS. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2018.07.05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusov PN, Filatova TV, Orekhova NP, Kulik VL (2018f) A “golden age” of the companies: conditions of its existence. J Rev Global Econ 7:88–103. SCOPUS. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2018.07.07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusov PN, Filatova TV, Orekhova NP, Kulik VL (2018g) Rating methodology: new look and new horizons. J Rev Global Econ 7:63–87. SCOPUS. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2018.07.06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusov PN, Filatova TV, Orekhova NP, Kulik VL, Weil I (2018b) New meaningful effects in modern capital structure theory. J Rev Global Econ 7:104–122. SCOPUS. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2018.07.08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusov PN, Filatova TV, Orekhova NP, Kulik VL, Weil I (2019) Ratings of the investment projects of arbitrary durations: new methodology. J Rev Global Econ 8:437–448. SCOPUS. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusov PN, Filatova TV, Orekhova NP, Kulik VL, Chang S-I, Lin YCG (2020) Modification of the Modigliani–Miller theory for the case of advance payments of tax on profit. J Rev Global Econ 9:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusov P, Filatova T, Orekhova N, Kulik V, Weil I, Brailov A (2018a) The impact of the central bank key rate and commercial banks credit rates on creating and maintaining of a favorable investment climate in the country. J Rev Global Econ 7:360–376. SCOPUS. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2018.07.31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusova A (2011) A comparison of the three methods of estimation of weighted average cost of capital and equity cost of company. Financ Anal Prob Sol 34(76):36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Filatova Т, Orehova N, Brusova А (2008) Weighted average cost of capital in the theory of Modigliani–Miller, modified for a finite life–time company. Bull FU 48:68–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Мodigliani F, Мiller M (1958) The cost of capital, corporate finance, and the theory of investment. Am Econ Rev 48:261–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Мodigliani F, Мiller M (1963) Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction. Am Econ Rev 53:147–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F, Miller M (1966) Some estimates of the cost of capital to the electric utility industry 1954–1957. Am Econ Rev 56:333–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers S (2001) Capital structure. J Econ Perspect 15(2):81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brusov, P., Filatova, T., Orekhova, N. (2021). Application of the Modigliani–Miller Theory, Modified for the Case of Advance Payments of Tax on Profit, in Rating Methodologies. In: Ratings. Contributions to Finance and Accounting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56243-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics