Abstract
This article suggests a critical analysis of development projects in the Mediterranean region, mainly for the Southern countries. It concerns primarily the ones conceived based on the Euro-Mediterranean Conference (November 1995) and on the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP) suggested by France in 2008 under the framework of the Project for the Mediterranean. They both advocates for a new approach to the concept of development in the Maghreb and in Morocco. In this part of the world, many projects have faced recurring problems such as cultural underpinnings that reside in the initiators’ mentalities, contradictory agendas and interests, or various political maneuvers and circumvention schemes. This reflection aims at outlining the causes behind the failure of these two projects submitted by the Europeans to the Mediterranean population. In addition to the authoritarian, self-destructing polices and knots of adversities that are causing difficulties between to the two shores, the Northern partners are hardly making efforts in terms of investments and commitments for the realization of the proposed programs. In addressing these multi-dimensional challenges, and restrictions imposed by economic globalization, the article argues that economic development is being shaped, essentially, within the framework of the national state and calls for a genuine and endogenous strategy in the conception of a possible model of development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In his study on: L’enjeu de l’islamisme au cœur du processus de Barcelone, Olfa Lamloum, notes that “official documents are keen to state as a matter of priority” the affirmation of security and the establishment of a climate of stability “before any democratic consideration” in, Critique internationale, N°18, 2003, P 178, or www.Persee.fr.
- 2.
The Euro-Mediterranean leaders opted for an “intergovernmental organisation” composed of 43 states, based on a “joint co-presidency” between the two shores of the Mediterranean with the objectives of “promoting dialogue and cooperation in the Mediterranean region”, with headquarters in Barcelona. It must also be said that this project was initially very ambitious, proposing major “priority” projects such as: the depollution of the Mediterranean, the development of motorways of the sea and land highways, civil protection, the Mediterranean Solar Plan, higher education and research, the Euro-Mediterranean University and the Mediterranean Business Development Initiative.
- 3.
Despite Morocco’s deficits in this area, it is obvious that rich countries, in a blatant and Machiavellian manner, are pursuing policies to attract and encourage the emigration of the executives that Morocco trains. While our country invests large sums of money in their training.
References
Alain Le Roy. 2008. La dynamique de l’Union est à maintenir collectivement. La Matin, 10 Juillet.
Arendt, Hannah. 1982. Les origines du totalitarisme, Vol. 2 L’impérialisme, trad. de l’angl. par Martine Leiris. Paris: Fayard.
Berque, Jacques. 1998. Une cause jamais perdue. Pour une Méditerranée plurielle: écrits politiques (1956–1995), 199. Paris: Albin Michel.
Bessis, Sophie. 2005. Dix ans après Barcelone: état des lieux du partenariat euro-méditerranéen. La Revue internationale et stratégique N°59, Automne.
Burk III, Edmund. 2016. Modernité, in Dictionnaire de la Méditerranée. sous la direction de: DionigiAlbera, Maryline Crivello, and Mohammed Tozy, 951. Paris: Actes Sud.
Claude, Liuzu. 1999. La Méditerranée selon Braudel. Confluences Méditerranée 31: 186.
El Aoufi, Noureddine. 2011. Le Maroc solidaire. Projet pour une société de confiance. Rabat: Ed Économie- Critique.
Lamloum, Olfa. 2003. Before any democratic consideration. Critique internationale N°18: 178, or www.Persee.fr.
Latouche, Serge. 2018. Sans développement, pas de salut, mais… le développement de quoi ? Manière de voir, Le monde diplomatique, Le progrès en procès N° 61: 10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Affaya, M.N. (2021). Dead-Ends of a Development Process Imposed from Above: Deconstruction of the Concept of “Partnership”. In: Bourqia, R., Sili, M. (eds) New Paths of Development. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56096-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56096-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56095-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56096-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)