Skip to main content

Emergence and Entanglement in a Theory of Political Economy

Part of the Studies in Public Choice book series (SIPC,volume 38)

Abstract

Political economy is a field of study where theorists typically treat polities and markets as separate orders of activity within society. Moreover, the standard mode of analysis treats those entities as existing in states of equilibrium. In contrast, this essay treats polities and markets as entangled and, moreover, as entities that have ecological and emergent character. Among other things, this shift in analytical focus means that turbulence of variable intensity is a key feature to be incorporated into a theory of political economy. It also means that human population systems are open and not closed, which further means that the future is generated through complex interaction inside a societal arena that entails both trade and conflict.

Keywords

  • Entangled political economy
  • Emergence vs. axiomatics
  • Action level vs. systems level
  • Non-logical action
  • Indeterminism and creativity

JEL Codes

  • D72
  • D78
  • E62
  • H61
  • P16

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-56088-1_2
  • Chapter length: 19 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-56088-1
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Aligica, P. D., & Tarko, V. (2012). Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom, and beyond. Governance, 25, 237–252.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (2001). Calculation and coordination. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (2007). Liberty vs. power in economic policy in the 20th and 21st centuries. Journal of Private Enterprise, 22, 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1949). The pure theory of public finance: A suggested approach. Journal of Political Economy, 57, 496–505.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1967). Public finance in democratic process. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1968). The demand and supply of public goods. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • De Viti de Marco, A. (1888). Il carattere teorico dell’economia finanziaria. Rome: Pasqualucci.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Viti de Marco, A. (1930). Un trentennio di lotte politiche. Roma: Collezione Meridionale Editrice.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Viti de Marco, A. (1936). First principles of public finance. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, A. (2002). Political economy in macroeconomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. A. (1995). Simple rules for a complex world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. A. (2014). The Classical Liberal Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eusepi, G., & Wagner, R. E. (2013). Tax prices in a democratic polity: The continuing relevance of Antonio de Viti de Marco. History of Political Economy, 45, 99–121.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, M. (2012). The upside-down constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R. G. (2002). From liberty to democracy: The transformation of american government. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, E. (1958 [1919]). Just taxation: A positive solution. In R. A. Musgrave & A. T. Peacock (Eds.), Classics in the theory of public finance (pp. 168–176). London: Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, S. 1970. The Art of Commuunity. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for Humane Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A. (1939). The voluntary exchange theory of public economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 53, 213–237.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V. (1987). The political theory of a compound republic (2nd ed.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V. (1997). The meaning of democracy and the vulnerability of democracies: A response to Tocqueville’s challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pantaleoni, M. (1911). Considerazioni dulle proprieta di un sistema di prezzi politici. Giornale degli Economisti, 42(9–29), 114–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political economics: Explaining economic policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podemska-Mikluch, M., & Wagner, R. E. (2013). Dyads, triads, and the theory of exchange. Review of Austrian Economics, 26, 171–182.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. C. (1971). Alienation and the Soviet Economy. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1955). Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 37, 350–356.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, A. B. (1984). The parable of the tribes. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V. (2011). Government versus markets: The changing economic role of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (1988). The calculus of consent: A Wicksellian retrospective. Public Choice, 56(153), 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2006). Retrogressive regime drift within a theory of emergent order. Review of Austrian Economics, 19, 113–123.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2012). A macro economy as an ecology of plans. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82, 433–444.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2014). Richard Epstein’s Classical Liberal Constitution: A Public Choice Refraction. New York University Journal of Law and Liberty, 8, 961–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2017). James M. Buchanan and liberal political economy: A rational reconstruction. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, K. (1896). Finanztheoretische untersuchungen. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, K. (1958). A new principle of just taxation. In R. A. Musgrave & A. T. Peacock (Eds.), Classics in the theory of public finance (pp. 72–118). London: Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard E. Wagner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wagner, R.E. (2021). Emergence and Entanglement in a Theory of Political Economy. In: Hebert, D.J., Thomas, D.W. (eds) Emergence, Entanglement, and Political Economy. Studies in Public Choice, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56088-1_2

Download citation