Skip to main content

Decentralisation and Reconfiguration of Multilevel Research Policy: The Case of Sweden

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Local Self-Government

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance ((PSSNG))

Abstract

Research policy in many countries has primarily been the business of the central state and has not been captured clearly within the scope of the local government. This chapter aims to better conceptualise the decentralisation of research policy from a multilevel governance perspective. Given the dearth of empirical analyses of such processes over time, the chapter focuses on a case of Sweden, examining changes between the central and local governments in power and resources. Overall, decentralisation of research policy can partly be seen as a bi-effect of decentralisation of welfare, higher education and regional development policies. It is argued that the role of local governments in Swedish research policy is primarily to function as complementary partners to the central state, rather than as independent policy-makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The primary data collection was carried out in 2017 and 2018 (see Persson 2018).

References

  • Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (Eds.). (2004). Multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. (2001). Kontrovers och konsensus. Vetenskap och politik i svenskt 1990-tal. Nora: Nya Doxa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. (2008). Kunskapsnation i kris? Politik, pengar och makt i svensk forskning. Nora: Nya Doxa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boström, M. (1998). Hjälp som självhjälp: regionala aktörers stöd till åtta högskolors utveckling. Falun: Dalarnas forskningsråd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. (2010). Coordinating a conscious geography: The role of research centers in multiscalar innovation policy and economic development in the US and Canada. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 460–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, M. (2000). The rise and fall of decentralization: A comparative analysis of arguments and practices in European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 38(2), 193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekermo, M. (2002). Den mångtydiga FoU-idén – lokala FoU-enheters mening och betydelse. Örebro: Örebro universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, J., Niklasson, L., & Persson, B. (2015). The role of municipalities in the bottom-up formation of a meta-region in Sweden. The Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 19(4), 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolltveit, K., & Askim, J. (2017). Decentralisation as substantial and institutional policy change: Scrutinising the regionalisation of science policy in Norway. Science and Public Policy, 44(4), 546–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostela, J., & Tydén, T. (2010). FoU i kommuner, landsting och regioner: Delrapport tre från IKA-projektet. Stockholm: Sveriges kommuner och landsting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2019). Introduction to comparative public administration: Administrative systems and reforms in Europe (2nd ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanahan, L., & Feldman, M. (2015). Multilevel innovation policy mix: A closer look at state policies that augment the federal SBIR program. Research Policy, 44(7), 1387–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidström, A. (2011). Sweden: Party-dominated subnational democracy under challenge. In J. Loughlin, F. Hendriks, & A. Lidström (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of local and regional democracy in Europe (pp. 414–428). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamuro, H., Nishimura, J., & Kitagawa, F. (2019). Multilevel policy governance and territorial adaptability: Evidence from Japanese SME innovation programmes. Regional Studies, 53(6), 803–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B., & May, T. (2007). Governance, science policy and regions: An introduction. Regional Studies, 41(8), 1039–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, B. (2012). Constructing an innovation policy agency: The case of the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems. In A. Rickne, S. Laestadius, & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), Innovation governance in an open economy: Shaping regional nodes in a globalized world (pp. 162–182). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, B. (2017). What shapes research policy at the local government level? The establishment of a research fund in a Swedish municipality. The Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 21(4), 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, B. (2018). Kommuner som forskningspolitiska aktörer – En jämförelse mellan Norrköping och Örebro (CKS rapport 2018:10). Linköping: Linköping University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (2010). Decentralisering, governance och institutionell förändring. In B. Rothstein (Ed.), Politik som organisation: Förvaltningspolitikens grundproblem (4th ed., pp. 245–270). Stockholm: SNS förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, A., Marlow, D., McCarthy, A., O’Brien, P., & Tomaney, J. (2015). Local institutions and local economic development: The local enterprise partnerships in England. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2005). Decentralization. A central concept in contemporary public management. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 371–397). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prop. 2016/17:50. Kunskap i samverkan – för samhällets utmaningar och stärkt konkurrenskraft (Government bill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandström, U., Abdallah, L., & Hällsten, M. (2003). Forskningsfinansiering genom regional samverkan (SISTER working paper 2003:22). Stockholm: SISTER.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCB statistics (Statistical database of Statistics Sweden). Statistics Sweden, Örebro. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveriges kommuner och landsting. (2015). FoI-miljöer i offentlig verksamhet: Forsknings- utvecklings- och innovationsmiljöer i kommuner, landsting och regioner. Stockholm: Sveriges kommuner och landsting.

    Google Scholar 

  • VINNOVA funding data base. VINNOVA, Stockholm. Accessed 18 Oct 2017.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Persson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Persson, B., Kitagawa, F. (2021). Decentralisation and Reconfiguration of Multilevel Research Policy: The Case of Sweden. In: Bergström, T., Franzke, J., Kuhlmann, S., Wayenberg, E. (eds) The Future of Local Self-Government. Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56059-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics